Stefan Livieratos wrote:
> "Sterling Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
Whereas, replacing the call_user_func above with the following:
call_user_func($name, array($param1));
>>>Well, I thought that th
"Sterling Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >>
> >> Whereas, replacing the call_user_func above with the following:
> >>
> >> call_user_func($name, array($param1));
> >>
> >
> > Well, I thought that the function call_user_func_a
On 2001-05-13 06:36:33, "Sterling Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Stefan Livieratos wrote:
> > Well, I thought that the function call_user_func_array() is supposed
to
> > be called this way. What good is it anyway? I suggest
> > 'call_user_func_array' should be removed as it is not needed and
Stefan Livieratos wrote:
> "Sterling Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>>Howdy all,
>> I've been going through the call_user_*() functions in
>>basic_functions.c and just a couple of notes/things I found odd.
>>
>> 1) With a
"Sterling Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Howdy all,
> I've been going through the call_user_*() functions in
> basic_functions.c and just a couple of notes/things I found odd.
>
>1) With a aforementioned bug, thies was ri
At 03:28 PM 5/12/01 -0400, Sterling Hughes wrote:
>Also, since the call_user_method*() functions are repetitive, we should
>probably nuke them at one point (and for now, have an E_NOTICE message
>saying that "these functions are outdated, use the array($obj, "method")
>syntax").
>
>Thoughts?
Y
Howdy all,
I've been going through the call_user_*() functions in
basic_functions.c and just a couple of notes/things I found odd.
1) With a aforementioned bug, thies was right, the following code
fails, but it shouldn't:
Fails.
Whereas, replacing the call_user_func above
