Hi,
it's nice to see that everyone wants to develop extensions for PHP,
but why do these extension go all into the main CVS tree? why not keep
PHP more modular?
Daniel Lorch
-UrsprØngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrey Hristov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Datum : Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2001
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001 15:15:29 +0100, Daniel Lorch wrote:
it's nice to see that everyone wants to develop extensions for PHP,
but why do these extension go all into the main CVS tree? why not keep
PHP more modular?
New extension (ike the one, we are talking about) will go to PEAR
and will not be
* Idiot I am wrote:
I suggest ext/template being extemely important.
Erm, of course if that extension would be as
powerful as PHPLIB's Template, IT[X] and Smarty
together.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001, Björn Schotte wrote:
I suggest ext/template being extemely important.
Sorry, but I am completely against it.
-Andrei
For society, it's probably a good thing that engineers value function over
appearance. For example, you wouldn't want engineers to build nuclear power
* Andrei Zmievski wrote:
I suggest ext/template being extemely important.
Sorry, but I am completely against it.
Why?
Björn.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001, Björn Schotte wrote:
* Andrei Zmievski wrote:
I suggest ext/template being extemely important.
Sorry, but I am completely against it.
Why?
See my previous message.
-Andrei
When I get a little money, I buy books;
and if any is left I buy food and clothes. --
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001, Björn Schotte wrote:
I suggest ext/template being extemely important.
Sorry, but I am completely against it.
I agree with Andrei here. If an templating extension is bundled with PHP,
it becomes the 'defacto supported' template
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001, Björn Schotte wrote:
I suggest ext/template being extemely important.
Sorry, but I am completely against it.
+1, the only exception I might make would be Smarty as it is well designed
and a lot of people use it but I dont think even smarty has a place in the
PHP
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Andrei here. If an templating extension is bundled with PHP,
it becomes the 'defacto supported' template engine. In other words, we
will say that this is the best template engine, because it is bundled with
PHP.
Yes, and it will hurt
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001, James Moore wrote:
+1, the only exception I might make would be Smarty as it is well designed
and a lot of people use it but I dont think even smarty has a place in the
PHP Distribution.
Perhaps in PEAR, but you are correct.
-Andrei
Complexity in the mind is not caused
hi,
besides, what makes templates slow are either string-replacements or
regular expressions and these are anyway core parts of PHP, thus
making a module won't speed up anyting. better contribute to PEAR and
write this template class in PHP - more transparency for other users.
Daniel,
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001 16:17:29 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001, Björn Schotte wrote:
I suggest ext/template being extemely important.
Sorry, but I am completely against it.
I agree with Andrei here. If an templating
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrei Zmievski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Björn Schotte [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Martin Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Daniel Lorch [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [PHP-DEV] [NEW EXTENSTION
Hi,
One thing I try to avoid is making assumptions, because most of the
world's problems come from that.
So perhaps you should make an RfC for inserting a (IMHO)
after every word in every sentence of a posting to php-dev
to satisfy your soul.
actually we should declare some prototype. how
Hi,
Web designers and pixel movers are yet too dumb to
check how XSL(T) works.
Ack.
the average pixel mover doesn't even know how to code HTML, what
doesn't keep them from creating webpages. sooner or later all major
companies (macromedia, adobe ..) will include XSLT-export to their
WYSIWYG
Proposal : libmyopinion.o (*heh*)
Regards,
Andrey
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Lorch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 6:36 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [PHP-DEV] [NEW EXTENSTION]: templates
Hi,
One thing I try to avoid is making assumptions
hi,
Daniel, no offending, but what you write makes completely no
sense at all. A c-module is as fast as an extension in
PHP. Why? It's the same. It just hangs out in PEAR in the CVS
tree. And of course its faster then anything written in PHP.
I was just thinking about the
Hristov
- Original Message -
From: Andrei Zmievski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Björn Schotte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Martin Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Daniel Lorch [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [PHP-DEV] [NEW EXTENSTION]: templates
hi Daniel,
when I look at /ext/ (PHP source) just to pick a random example:
what's 'vpopmail' doing there (no personal offense to the author,
really randomly picked)? I mean, vpopmail has it's own deamon and an
interface written in PHP (ok, that one is ugly, it depends on global
variables
19 matches
Mail list logo
