[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Proposal for naming tests
At 11:57 25-10-2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
to make easier maintenance and checking possible I would suggest to name
our tests more appropriate:
+1
Class: Name: Example:
Tests for bugs bugbugid.phptbug17123.phpt
Tests for functions functionname.phptdba_open.phpt
General tests for extensions extnameno.phpt dba3.phpt
+same for multiple tests on the same function.
I do not see a real use to rename tests, but IMO this is the way to go
for newly written tests. Of course renaming tests is ok too if you like
to do that :)
There's one drawback. Extensions with names after 'b' get evaluated after
the bug tests.
This is currently not a problem, but I've been playing with the thought to
introduce 'skip_ext' to speed things up:
--SKIP--
?php if(!extension_loaded('dba3')) { die(skip_ext this extension is not
available); } ?
But of course you can just tell me to stop playing with the tought :)
Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards,
Webmaster IDG.nl
Melvyn Sopacua
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Proposal for naming tests
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
At 11:57 25-10-2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
[snip]
I do not see a real use to rename tests, but IMO this is the way to go
for newly written tests. Of course renaming tests is ok too if you like
to do that :)
There's one drawback. Extensions with names after 'b' get evaluated after
the bug tests.
This is currently not a problem, but I've been playing with the thought to
introduce 'skip_ext' to speed things up:
--SKIP--
?php if(!extension_loaded('dba3')) { die(skip_ext this extension is not
available); } ?
But of course you can just tell me to stop playing with the tought :)
Hereby I tell you to stop playing with that thought :P No, serious... I
don't think we really need this, and is speed really that important?
(The whole suite runs in under a minute here with about 75% of the
extensions).
Derick
--
---
Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/
JDI Media Solutions
--[ if you hold a unix shell to your ear, do you hear the c? ]-
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Proposal for naming tests
At 12:49 25-10-2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
[...]
There's one drawback. Extensions with names after 'b' get evaluated after
the bug tests.
This is currently not a problem, but I've been playing with the thought to
introduce 'skip_ext' to speed things up:
--SKIP--
?php if(!extension_loaded('dba3')) { die(skip_ext this extension is not
available); } ?
But of course you can just tell me to stop playing with the tought :)
Hereby I tell you to stop playing with that thought :P No, serious... I
don't think we really need this, and is speed really that important?
(The whole suite runs in under a minute here with about 75% of the
extensions).
Well - my testmachine at home, is a Cyrix 200MMX, with 128Mb, so it runs a
little longer than that :-)
And no - it's not that important - I'm just impatient sometimes :)
Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards,
Webmaster IDG.nl
Melvyn Sopacua
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
