[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-12 Thread Phil Driscoll
On Friday 11 May 2001 23:26, Richard Lynch wrote: If you ignore it, you'll continue the problem: People attempt to install PHP with PWS on Win95/98 and get frustrated, and have to dig all over creation to find install instructions that should have been in the PHP release. What I'm

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-11 Thread Richard Lynch
I think PWS on 95/98 looks in the registry... Agreed - PWS on these platforms is fundamentally a cut down version of IIS3. I suspect it is possible to have this on NTWS as well, but PWS4 which comes with the NT option pack (same CD as IIS4) certainly looks in the Metabase - though I don't

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-10 Thread Phil Driscoll
then please merge the install.txt in there, as it's currently somewhat incomplete I will attempt to do that this afternoon. Cheers -- Phil Driscoll Dial Solutions +44 (0)113 294 5112 http://www.dialsolutions.com http://www.dtonline.org -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-10 Thread Cynic
I don't think so, it looks ok. But I must admit that I prefer plaintext readme's... But that's just me. At 13:40 10.5. 2001, Liz wrote the following: -- I noticed no comments at all about the HTML version of the readme I offered..

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-10 Thread Phil Driscoll
Does it suck that bad? No - it doesn't suck at all! It's just that James's suggestion that we update the installation chapter of the manual and generate the installation noted from that is so eminently sensible, that it would be foolish to do otherwise - which sadly means that the efforts both

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-10 Thread Liz
I don't think so, it looks ok. But I must admit that I prefer plaintext readme's... But that's just me. Depends, for a unix system, I'd agree, I dont want a HTML one, but for windows, its nice to have one you can easily skip to bits. So, in this case, Id say it was worth it. As every windows

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-10 Thread Liz
It's just that James's suggestion that we update the installation chapter of the manual and generate the installation noted from that is so eminently sensible, that it would be foolish to do otherwise - which sadly means that the efforts both you and I did earlier will be consigned forever to

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-10 Thread Liz
On the subject of updating the manual though.. the IMAP, POP and NNTP functions section.. it only contains imap functions. Im sure this is confusing to people. It's just that James's suggestion that we update the installation chapter of the manual and generate the installation noted from that

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-10 Thread Chuck Hagenbuch
Quoting Liz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: the IMAP, POP and NNTP functions section.. it only contains imap functions. Im sure this is confusing to people. It's the names of the functions that are wrong, not the name of the section. Read the documentation for imap_open() - it'll talk to pop3 and nntp

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-10 Thread Jon Parise
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:22:35PM +0200, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: Liz wrote: or... imap_* pop3_* nntp_* just for good measure? as it certainly reads better to see pop3_open(..) polluting the function namespace by even more aliases? no way Right, that would be

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-10 Thread Phil Driscoll
I'm in the middle of sorting out the windows installation instructions for the manual and the readme file for the windows distribution. What I thought would be a quick job, as usual, is much more complicated than I thought. The readme.txt, install.txt and the manual all contradict each other, and

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-10 Thread Liz
Anyway, I'm well on with the job, but I have an issue with the instructions on installing PHP with PWS on NT Workstation. All the instructions everywhere talk about editing the registry, but as far as I am aware, PWS on NTWS is not in the least bit interested in the registry - it uses the IIS

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-10 Thread Liz
To the best of my knowledge, it used to when it was based on IIS3 (and was essentially the same thing currently shipped as PWS for 9x/ME) but the current PWS for NTWS is essentially IIS4. Could only be an improvement. -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe,

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-09 Thread Phil Driscoll
There is a separate file called install.txt which covers installation on a wider range of servers. Ideally there would be one document - I was just soaking up a spare 10 minutes to improve things a bit! Cheers -- Phil Driscoll Dial Solutions +44 (0)113 294 5112 http://www.dialsolutions.com

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-09 Thread Liz
the readme shold be nuked as it's pretty out of date. info's not covered by install.txt should be moved there, IMO. One thing I noted when setting my windows stuff up was that there were various details in different places, makes it a little more confusing. A simple HTML file including with

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file

2001-05-09 Thread Daniel Beulshausen
At 18:58 09.05.2001 +0100, James Moore wrote: Well keep the manual up to date and we can generate install.txt from this very simply.. make lynx -dump html/install.windows.html install.txt in the manual dir. I think this is probably the best way to do it. then please merge the install.txt in