Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV]ctype function (re?)naming

2001-03-02 Thread Zak Greant
ot;PHP Development" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 2:55 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV]ctype function (re?)naming We should probably just make a list of all the effected functions and see which ones we start fixing

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] ctype function (re?)naming

2001-03-01 Thread Andi Gutmans
We're probably best off staying with the status quo and trying to keep a close look at any new modules which make it into the tree and modules which have been added since 4.0.4 (or maybe a small time before). It doesn't make much sense to go back and break old names and it doesn't make lots of

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re:[PHP-DEV]ctype function (re?)naming

2001-03-01 Thread Ron Chmara
Andi Gutmans wrote: It doesn't make much sense to go back and break old names and it doesn't make lots of sense to create a zillion of aliases. I guess if there are some names which in particular need fixing because they are terrible (there might be some of these) then we should fix them on a