Re: [Internal] [Discussion] Paul M Jones

2016-07-13 Thread Larry Garfield
The second post in this thread, from me, included a link to nearly a dozen past examples. Each individually is arguably minor point. However, taken all together, over an extended period of time (my examples go back only this year, but Paul's been on the list for years) it creates a pattern

Re: [Internal] [Discussion] Paul M Jones

2016-07-13 Thread Larry Garfield
Hm, yeah that was mentioned you're right. And that mention is inappropriate, as the issue isn't political views elsewhere (as mentioned, I know many people here who disagree politically but are still able to collaborate) but behavior and communication issues here in FIG. My point regarding

Re: [Internal] [Discussion] Paul M Jones

2016-07-13 Thread Tom Etzel
I've read through every post on this thread. Paul's politics have been mentioned more than a few times by more than a few people on this thread. For instance: "> Paul is an asset to this project that needs to be cared for! PMJ is a human being that needs to be cared for the same as any other

Re: [Internal] [Discussion] Paul M Jones

2016-07-13 Thread Larry Garfield
On 07/12/2016 06:56 PM, Chris Johnson wrote: Much of this does appear to stem from the dislike of his politics. I don't find his politics germane. Inability to work with people of differing political views is no recipe for success (just look where that lack has gotten the USA in the past

Re: Switch to forum software?

2016-07-13 Thread Roman Tsjupa
Even if we can't get the forum with all the features in one go, at least it will have some features. We could just keep using regular messages for voting until something is implemented. On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 6:25 AM, 'scott molinari' via PHP Framework Interoperability Group