Re: Alternative to FIG 3.0: Encourage *-interop projects

2016-08-08 Thread Alessandro Lai
This is a really nice proposal. I also think that this does not solve anyway the issues of the FIG itself; maybe the best option could be to push for both approaches? Nothing in the FIG 3.0 proposal forbids that! In fact, I think that the FIG 3.0 modification are good anyway, and that the

Re: FIG 3.0 (Including a TL;DR Summary)

2016-08-08 Thread Samantha QuiƱones
Hi, all, I was not monitoring the ML yesterday (getting some family Q.T. after a trip) but I'll be keeping an eye on it today. I think we are all adults and can abide by throttling rules in good faith. In the future, if you have any concerns about the content or velocity of this (or any other

Alternative to FIG 3.0: Encourage *-interop projects

2016-08-08 Thread Paul Jones
Dear Voting Members, There is another way to solve the problems listed in the [FIG 3.0 summary][1]: formally encourage the creation of a *-interop project as a prerequisite to a FIG entrance vote. (Look to container-interop and async-interop as examples.) * * * Point by point from the FIG 3.0

Re: Switch to forum software?

2016-08-08 Thread Roman Tsjupa
> Downloading an email is 20-30 KB. Opening a forum page could be 1MB or more. Honestly this is kind of a ridiculous argument. But even if you consider it, still a forum page is not 1MB per page, the css and js files will get cached after your first request, so browsing subsequent pages won't