[PRE-VOTE DISCUSSION] Withdraw PSR-8

I would be disappointed to see PSR-8 disappear. It would be a smooth move to schedule a vote such that, should it pass, PSR-8 is accepted on April 1, 2018. It is not a bad thing to have a joke or two. HTTP 418 exists, after all. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

-1 from Phalcon On Sunday, 4 September 2016 11:26:50 UTC-5, Michael Cullum wrote: > > Hi all, > > The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are > unable to do so not being voting members. > > *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by >

Re: Resigning My Position ...

We were discussing the status of various PSRs so we could see what resources they needed and the like in one of our first monthly meetings and when PSR-8 came up, we were aware it was stuck in Limbo (because of it's nature) so we contacted the Editor [Larry] to discuss what he wanted to do

Re: [PRE-VOTE DISCUSSION] Withdraw PSR-8

As mentioned at the ZendCon 2015 FIG meeting, the consensus of the group was that PSRs can't really be withdrawn, as there are no rules for what happens to the number, or what that status even really is. That was what prompted the need for the additional bylaw, as it was an oversight on the part

Re: Resigning My Position ...

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Paul Jones wrote: > > > On Sep 9, 2016, at 10:08, Michael Cullum wrote: > > > > We [secretaries] discussed PSR-8 a while back and we've also been part > of numerous conversations with Larry [PSR-8 Editor] and other

[PRE-VOTE DISCUSSION] Withdraw PSR-8

Hi all, Measure: "Withdraw PSR-8 from consideration as a PSR." I presume that the editor is willing, based on other conversations. And since Micheal Cullum (as secretarial assistant) seems to be in the habit now of reminding us when the two-week period of discussion is up, I look forward to

Re: Resigning My Position ...

> On Sep 9, 2016, at 10:08, Michael Cullum wrote: > > We [secretaries] discussed PSR-8 a while back and we've also been part of > numerous conversations with Larry [PSR-8 Editor] and other folks and we came > to the conclusion that it doesn't appear there is really a

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

-1 --Larry Garfield, Drupal On 09/04/2016 11:26 AM, Michael Cullum wrote: Hi all, The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are unable to do so not being voting members. *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by the PHP FIG must

Re: [VOTE] PSR-6 Errata

On 09/08/2016 09:31 PM, Daniel Hunsaker wrote: > Hopefully should FIG 3 pass the Core Committee can take up this question > more effectively, but I don't know that there's a reason to bother if > we're not even going to make quorum. TBH, I find this a bit scary. In fact

Re: Resigning My Position ...

If only this had passed an acceptance vote, maybe we'd have a different environment today if we had a few more hugs. On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 7:53 AM Paul Jones wrote: > Hi all, > > I am resigning my position as sponsor of PSR-8, the "Huggable" Interface. > This was a fun

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

-1 concrete5 On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:42 PM Ryan Thompson wrote: > -1 PyroCMS > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

Resigning My Position ...

Hi all, I am resigning my position as sponsor of PSR-8, the "Huggable" Interface. This was a fun joke way-back-when, but its time has passed. And if I may suggest it, perhaps the editor should voluntarily withdraw the PSR from consideration. Thanks everyone! -- Paul M. Jones