Re: [PSR-8] Working Group?

2017-01-14 Thread Andreas Heigl
Am 13.01.17 um 23:41 schrieb Larry Garfield: > Thank you Graham for offering to Sponsor. As for the rest of the > volunteers, I've been advised that the WG should consist of people with > "specialist knowledge in the field, or it should be relevant to their > project/work". I am unclear how to

Re: [PSR-8] Working Group?

2017-01-13 Thread Larry Garfield
Thank you Graham for offering to Sponsor. As for the rest of the volunteers, I've been advised that the WG should consist of people with "specialist knowledge in the field, or it should be relevant to their project/work". I am unclear how to apply that standard in this case. --Larry

Re: [PSR-8] Working Group?

2017-01-13 Thread Andreas Heigl
Am 13.01.17 um 14:17 schrieb Mark Baker: > On 12/01/2017 22:41, Larry Garfield wrote: >> PSR-8, like any other in-progress PSR, needs to form a Working Group >> to remain an active PSR. I am happy to continue as Editor. That >> means we need one other Core Committee member to sponsor it and at

Re: [PSR-8] Working Group?

2017-01-13 Thread Mark Baker
On 13/01/2017 09:38, Jordi Boggiano wrote: The PSR-8 Working Group henceforth sets to work. Is the WG ging to be using Scrum? -- Mark Baker _ |. \ \-3 |_J_/ PHP | || | __ | || |m| |m| I LOVE PHP -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [PSR-8] Working Group?

2017-01-13 Thread Mark Baker
On 12/01/2017 22:41, Larry Garfield wrote: PSR-8, like any other in-progress PSR, needs to form a Working Group to remain an active PSR. I am happy to continue as Editor. That means we need one other Core Committee member to sponsor it and at least 3 other individuals to join the Working

Re: [PSR-8] Working Group?

2017-01-13 Thread Jordi Boggiano
The PSR-8 Working Group henceforth sets to work. On 13 January 2017 at 03:30, <greyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm very happy to sponsor. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PHP Framework Interoperability Group&quo

[PSR-8] Working Group?

2017-01-12 Thread greydnls
I'm very happy to sponsor. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group,

[PSR-8] Working Group?

2017-01-12 Thread Navarr Barnier
I'm unable to sponsor but am on board with joining the WG. Ideally I'd like to see PSR-8 move out of proposal on April 1st -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [PSR-8] Working Group?

2017-01-12 Thread Sara Golemon
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 2:41:15 PM UTC-8, Larry Garfield wrote: > > I feel I need to do this to avoid disappointing a very affectionate > Twitter account... > > PSR-8, like any other in-progress PSR, needs to form a Working Group to > remain an active PSR. I am happy to continue as

Re: [PSR-8] Working Group?

2017-01-12 Thread Chuck Burgess
I'm game to play along  On Jan 12, 2017 16:41, "Larry Garfield" wrote: I feel I need to do this to avoid disappointing a very affectionate Twitter account... PSR-8, like any other in-progress PSR, needs to form a Working Group to remain an active PSR. I am happy to

Re: [PSR-8] Working Group?

2017-01-12 Thread Daniel Hunsaker
I can't sponsor, but I'll gladly join the WG. On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 3:41:15 PM UTC-7, Larry Garfield wrote: > > I feel I need to do this to avoid disappointing a very affectionate > Twitter account... > > PSR-8, like any other in-progress PSR, needs to form a Working Group to >