Re: [Internals][FIG 3.0] Extending Nomination Period & Delaying FIG 3.0 Transition

Hi Michael, I am happy with this. I think it is the right call to make. Many thanks, Paul On 9 Nov 2016 17:09, "Michael Cullum" wrote: Hi all, Does anyone have any objections to extending the Core Committee nomination period one month and pushing the FIG 3.0

[CC][Nomination] Lukas Kahwe Smith

I hereby nominate Lukas Smith for the Core Committee. Lukas has a great experience talking to different communities, and he was key to some great collaborations between PHP projects. He was also one of the people who helped change the PHP development process a few years back. I'm sure he

Re: [CC][Nomination] David Négrier

Woot! Thanks a lot Michiel. I obviously accept your nomination. :) -- David. Le mercredi 9 novembre 2016 20:43:01 UTC+1, Michiel Rook a écrit : > > I hereby nominate David Négrier for the Core Committee! > > Michiel > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[CC][Nomination] David Négrier

I hereby nominate David Négrier for the Core Committee! Michiel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [CC][Nomination] Matthew O'Phinney

Thanks Larry & Matthew. Recieved. http://bit.ly/cc-election-candidates -- Michael C On 8 November 2016 at 17:38, Matthew Weier O'Phinney < mweierophin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 8, 2016 4:33 PM, "Larry Garfield" wrote: > > > > Since no one else seems to be doing so,

Re: [Internals][FIG 3.0] Extending Nomination Period & Delaying FIG 3.0 Transition

Answering this required me working backwards so I just did the full timetable. The new FIG 3.0 transition timetable would be as follows: 1st November: CC Nominations open *7th December: CC Nominations close* (Initial nominations, people can accept nominations after this so long as voting hasn't

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-13: Link Definition Interfaces

+1 from Jackalope > On 31 Oct 2016, at 22:15, Matthew Weier O'Phinney > wrote: > > Per the by-laws, the required review period has passed for the > proposed standard PSR-13 (Link Definition Interfaces). No changes have > been made in the past two weeks since

Re: [Internals][FIG 3.0] Extending Nomination Period & Delaying FIG 3.0 Transition

We definitely need to delay this. Thank you for raising the issue Michael and Roman. On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:53 AM Larry Garfield wrote: > Under the circumstances, I do not object. What end-date are you proposing > for nominations? Early December? > > --Larry Garfield

Re: [Internals][FIG 3.0] Extending Nomination Period & Delaying FIG 3.0 Transition

No objection from PEAR... CRB On Nov 9, 2016 11:09 AM, "Michael Cullum" wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone have any objections to extending the Core Committee nomination > period one month and pushing the FIG 3.0 implementation timetable back a > month (so the new

Re: [Internals][FIG 3.0] Extending Nomination Period & Delaying FIG 3.0 Transition

Hi Michael, The PHP-FIG Core Commitee deserves to have the best members we can find. The 10 days timeline was certainly too short and if we need to choose between the respecting the fixed timeline or giving us more time to find the best people, I'm definitely for the later solution. I'm not a

[CC Nomination Request] David Négrier

To all FIG project representatives: I'm writing to the list today to request a nomination to the FIG 3.0 Core Committee. If you read this list regularly, you probably already know me as the co-editor of PSR-11 and container-interop. I'm also the lead developer of Mouf

Re: [PSR-11] Review: should the container ALWAYS return the same instance?

Hi, Matthew! Thanks for replying :) Larry and I presented a few cases where the framework relies on its components having a shared instance, instead of exclusive ones. Every framework component that fetches services that handles connections, IO sockets, in-memory caches, and others HAVE to be