Re: [VOTE][CC] Expulsion Vote for eZ Systems

+1 from PPI Framework On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 8:50 AM Alex Makarov wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:49 AM Cees-Jan Kiewiet > wrote: > >> +1 sadly >> >> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 17:43, Chris Tankersley >> wrote: >> >>> +1, unfortunately. >>> >>> Chris Tankersley >>>

Re: [VOTE][CC] Expulsion Vote for Stormpath PHP SDK

+1 from PPI Framework On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 8:50 AM Alex Makarov wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:48 AM Cees-Jan Kiewiet > wrote: > >> +1 sadly >> >> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 17:43, Chris Tankersley >> wrote: >> >>> +1, unfortunately. >>> >>> Chris Tankersley >>>

Re: PSR-7/PSR-15 Sessions

way, there are standard requests, standard > responses, standard request handling, but no standard for storing data > between requests, and PHP sessions dont work nicely with PSR 7 response > objects, so by having a standard we dont need to worry about that anymore. > > Amanda. > >

Re: PSR-7/PSR-15 Sessions

Hi Amanda, Ask yourself. What problem in the community are you solving? We don't want to make standards for the sake of it. Are people actively trying to write code in Symfony that doesn't wanna use Symfony sessions? Figure out the demand first, validate it, present some info. I'm not a

Re: [ENTRANCE] [VOTE] [CC] PER Coding Style

Fair play! Sounds like a solid initiative/idea. On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 3:33 AM Chris Tankersley wrote: > As the sponsor for this PER Working Group, I hereby call an entrance vote > for the PER Coding Style. > > The purpose of this PER is to migrate PSR-12 to a living document under > the new

Re: [VOTE] Core Committee Election January 2022

Voting as the PPI Representative 1. Korvin Szanto 2. Chris Tankersley 3. Ken Guest 4. Enrico Zimuel 5. Florian Engelhardt 6. Navarr Barnier On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:02 PM Matthew Weier O'Phinney < mweierophin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Voting as the Laminas representative: > > 1. Enrico Zimuel >

Re: FIG-hosted enumerations

On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 1:51 AM Larry Garfield wrote: > Greetings, FIGlets. (What does one call a FIG-involved person, anyway? > FIGlet? FIGment?) > We're definitely FIGlet's ;-) Spiderfig, spiderdig, codes whatever a spiderfig codes. > > As you may be aware, PHP 8.1 is going to include

Re: [IDEA] Transition IRC to Slack/Gitter/Discord

On Wed, 16 Dec 2020, 16:41 Andreas Heigl, wrote: > Am 16.12.20 um 17:38 schrieb Ben Ramsey: > > My $0.02 as one who lurks on the mailing lists: > > > > Chat programs, whether it be Slack or Discord or Rocket.Chat or > > Mattermost or whatever, are inherently bad at transparency, which is > >

Re: laravel new-feature!!

Saeed, this question is out of scope. Your question/conversation is better suited for reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/PHP/ On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, 11:46 saeed jahanakbari, wrote: > We know that composer adds file dependencies and we can also save our > custom dependencies to composer.json file.

Re: [VOTE] Core Committee Election

1. Chris Tankersley 2. Korvin Szanto 3. Enrico Zimuel 4. Ben Edmunds 5. Massimiliano Arione On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, 13:43 Woody Gilk, wrote: > 1. Chris Tankersley > 2. Korvin Szanto > 3. Ben Edmunds > 4. Enrico Zimuel > 5. Massimiliano Arione > -- > Woody Gilk > https://www.shadowhand.com > > > On

Re: PSR-11 and the next steps - Service Provider Interop

As per last year, I'm still keen to continue to contribute to this. I have already implemented and solved this situation for the laravel project. I gave my client container interop and interoperable service providers and respective config, and brought this to laravel projects This was to share

Re: PSR-6 reserved characters constant

Hey Gabriel, Thanks for showing an interest in PSR-6, and for making PRs in the first place! All community feedback is welcomed. I noticed Larry commented on github already. Although we don't like to change a spec once published, for adding new features, this is actually a good addition which

Re: New representative for Magento

Welcome Anton On Tue, 15 May 2018, 18:04 Ben Marks, wrote: > Hi all, > > Effective immediately the representative for Magento will be Anton Kril ( > anton.k...@gmail.com), who is Magento's Director of Architecture. His > knowledge and experience make him a much better fit

Re: PSR-16 question

Hi Alice, It's recommended not to throw \Exception but throw your own cache exception class, which implement's PSR-16's CacheException. """ use Psr\SimpleCache\CacheException; class MyProjectsCacheException extends Exception implements CacheException """ This way you'll be able to continue to

Re: PSR-16 / NullCache / CacheAwareInterface / CacheAwareTrait

I will talk to Jordi about it and get back to you. Cheers On 9 Nov 2017 19:46, "Pol Dellaiera" wrote: > In the meantime, I've created a PR for php-fig/cache-util: https:// > github.com/php-fig/cache-util/pull/13 > > Let's see if we can add it to that repo or create a new

Re: [VOTE] Secretary Election

1. Margret Staples 2. Mark Railton 3. Alessandro Lai On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Joe Ferguson wrote: > 1. Margret Staples > 2. Mark Railton > 3. Alessandro Lai > > Good Luck and Godspeed Secretaries :D > > - Phergie > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:06 PM, GeeH

Re: [VOTE][CC] Entrance vote for PSR-12: Extended Coding Style Guide

On 20 Oct 2017 4:38 pm, "Sara Golemon" wrote: On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 2:39:36 PM UTC-4, Korvin Szanto wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > PSR-12 was already accepted and assigned the number 12 back in FIG 2.0[0], > however, it turns out that my post on the 30th of June[1] was

Re: Service providers PSR: seeking members for a working group

I already worked a lot on these problems with PPI. If you want me to join the WG then i will help out On 28 Mar 2017 11:01 am, "David Négrier" wrote: > Hey list! > > > PSR-11 has been accepted so we have standardized how to fetch entries from > containers. > > The next

Re: Service providers PSR: seeking members for a working group

I already worked a lot on these problems with PPI. If you want me to join the WG then i will help out. On 28 Mar 2017 11:01 am, "David Négrier" wrote: > Hey list! > > > PSR-11 has been accepted so we have standardized how to fetch entries from > containers. > > The next

Re: Final underscore in class names

utside of PSR-1. There's nothing wrong with that really. A personal suggestion, so you're sticking to StudlyCaps, is you could do something like TokenEcho TokenEmpty for class names, if PSR-1 is important to you. > > 2017-03-10 9:49 GMT+01:00 Paul Dragoonis <dragoo...@gmail.com>: &g

Re: Final underscore in class names

Hi Marco, Comments inline. On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Marco Perone wrote: > As per PSR-1 specifications, class names must be in StudlyCaps. > > > However, if I want to define a class named Echo (or any other Php > keyword), I am not able to do that beacuse if I do so

Re: [Vote] [Core Committee] Membership Application: Phergie

+1 from PPI On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Shefik wrote: > + 1 from Zikula > > - Shefik > > On Feb 8, 2017, at 9:01 AM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney < > mweierophin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 10:54:18 AM UTC-6, Chris Tankersley wrote:

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-11 ContainerInterface

+1 from PPI On 2 Feb 2017 4:05 pm, "André R." wrote: > +1 from eZ > > Best, > André R. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: Seeking Explanations of PRS-2 Standards

Used most used (the commonalities) between the frameworks and major libraries at the time. Cognitive load for switching between these frameworks and providing a level of consistency between them. Phpstorm has an auto formatter to format your code for you, so even if its not natural to you it

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Jordi Boggiano wrote: > Happy new year everyone! > > The vote ended yesterday, and passed! Thanks all for taking the time to > review. > What Jordi said :-) Upon putting together the initial version of PSR-16, I set up some Docker

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

Hey, +1 for PPI Framework Engine Can the rest of the group please get behind this, and vote? Many thanks, Paul On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Jordi Boggiano wrote: > Before I forget, +1 for Composer :) > > -- > Jordi Boggiano > @seldaek - http://seld.be > > -- > You

Re: Routing PSR

h "natural >> standardization" for a PSR to be viable. >> >> --Larry Garfield >> >> On 11/19/2016 11:51 AM, Cees-Jan Kiewiet wrote: >> >> Same here, would be very interested to see what Paul has in mind for a >> routing PSR >> >

Re: [REVIEW] PSR-16 Simple Cache

Hey, Just wanted to say thanks everyone for the compliments and for the constructive feedback. If there's any more clarifications in the spec that you feel are *not* tight enough please continue to raise here or make a PR so we can review it. Many thanks, Paul On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:21 PM,

Re: Routing PSR

Hello everyone, I have been waiting to announce this until after I finish with PSR16, but there's no time like the present. I have been working on the routing PSR for some time now, given my passion and experience at integrating 5 different routers into PPI Framework Engine. I have spoke with a

Re: [Internals][FIG 3.0] Extending Nomination Period & Delaying FIG 3.0 Transition

Hi Michael, I am happy with this. I think it is the right call to make. Many thanks, Paul On 9 Nov 2016 17:09, "Michael Cullum" wrote: Hi all, Does anyone have any objections to extending the Core Committee nomination period one month and pushing the FIG 3.0

Re: Who can vote in CC elections?

Hello, We all know quality != quantity. I'm sure you're factoring that in here. There's people in this group that aren't that active, whom I rely on their judgement to vote on such matters. Can you, Michael or another appointed secretary, open up to the whole FIG group the logic behind deciding

Re: [Important] [Internals] All projects must declare intention to remain members

PPI Framework will remain. On 6 Oct 2016 9:09 a.m., "Dracony" wrote: > PHPixie of course will stay, +1 :) > > On Monday, October 3, 2016 at 1:44:02 AM UTC+2, Michael Cullum wrote: >> >> As per the FIG 3.0 bylaws, all member projects must, between the 1st >> October and

Re: [VOTE] "FIG 3.0" Bylaw amendments (Take 2)

PPI votes +1 On 24 Sep 2016 00:00, "Chuck Burgess" wrote: > +1 from PEAR > > On Sep 23, 2016 13:39, "Michiel Rook" wrote: > >> +0 Phing >> >> On 17-9-2016 1:14, Larry Garfield wrote: >> >> I hereby open a vote for the following bylaw changes,

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

-1 from PPI Framework On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Andres Gutierrez < gutierrezandresfel...@gmail.com> wrote: > -1 from Phalcon > > On Sunday, 4 September 2016 11:26:50 UTC-5, Michael Cullum wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are

Re: Github Permissions Update

g and adds a skin then the existing team gets booted out. I'd like to be re-instated back into the web team. > > Thanks, > Michael > > > On Monday, 11 July 2016 12:55:32 UTC+1, Paul Dragoonis wrote: >> >> All of a sudden my RW access to the website got removed. Can this be

Re: [VOTE] Secretary Election August 2016

Votes for PPI 1. Samantha Quiñones 2. Jonathan Reinink 3. Amanda Folson 4. Matthew 'Matt' Trask 5. Paul 'PMJ' Jones 6. Phil Sturgeon On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Dracony wrote: > Votes for PHPixie: > > Paul 'PMJ' Jones > Samantha Quiñones > Amanda Folson > Jonathan

Re: Alternative to FIG 3.0 - Is it time to call FIG complete?

On 9 Aug 2016 9:22 p.m., "Samantha Quiñones" wrote: > > As Gary said, please let's keep this on-topic and not personal. I advise you to please assume that others are contributing constructively unless it's been shown otherwise. I want to aplogise for the personal nature

Re: Alternative to FIG 3.0 - Is it time to call FIG complete?

On 9 Aug 2016 17:54, "Larry Garfield" wrote: > > Given that there's ~9 specs being worked on currently in various stages, the idea that FIG's work is "done" seems completely unsupportable. > > FIG is already the de facto PHP Standards Body. That much is very clear; some

Re: Status of PSR-12 survey

That's to be discussed later. This is a fair compromise > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 10:12:16 PM UTC+3, Paul Dragoonis wrote: >> >> On 31 Jul 2016 19:58, "Paul Jones" <pmjo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > > On Jul 31, 2016, a

Re: Status of PSR-12 survey

On 31 Jul 2016 19:58, "Paul Jones" wrote: > > > > On Jul 31, 2016, at 13:36, Michael Cullum wrote: > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > A mix of the two. > > Well, let's remove one part of that mix, then. > > > > As previously stated, this PSR was always going to

Re: [Cache] Errata regarding \DateTimeInterface

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Larry Garfield wrote: > Hm. I would be open to this. We can include the sample code to > copy-paste in the errata, and include it in the utlis package. > > Does anyone object to this recommendation for the errata? Paul and Robert >

Re: [Vote] Require Aura project to replace its representative

-1 PPI On 29 Jul 2016 2:54 p.m., "Michael Cullum" wrote: > Judd, > > Voting is for project representatives of member projects only as per the > voting protocol[1] and only votes, not discussion or opinion polling, > should take place in this thread. > > Thanks, > Michael

Re: Github Permissions Update

All of a sudden my RW access to the website got removed. Can this be reinstated please. Thanks. On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Michael Cullum wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just done a bit of updating with regards to github permissions. Those > who should have access to