On Friday, December 9, 2016 at 2:47:36 PM UTC-2, Michael Cullum wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We’ve finally got to the voting stage in the first set of Core Committee
> Elections where 12 CC members will be elected to staggered terms.
>
> Candidates List (Alphabetical)
>
>
m out of here. Best of luck. See you at the next conference.
Regards,
Phil Sturgeon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 10:26:17 AM UTC-4, Hari K T wrote:
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> Thank you for your write up.
>
>
>> We know about the bylaws. :) If we were following the bylaws to the
>> letter and ignoring precedence, then it would be fine. What is being said
>> in this thread, is that
ember shouldn't be able to
>>> vote in their own expulsion. A member project should not serve as
>>> secretary, etc. These things seem very common sense to me, and yet, because
>>> they aren't explicitly and directly covered in the bylaws, they're allowed
>>&
Adam: I think the suggestion from Graham was to delve as deeply as we have
done in the past and no further. We aren't trying to find new ways to keep
people out, but Paul did set a precedence in the Beau/Silex vote and as
such that same concern should be just as relevant now.
If we start
Hey Gary!
As Larry suggests, the two approaches are very similar and not mutually
exclusive. Taking container interop as an example again, it could easily be
a random project by interested parties that is then turned into a working
group, as a working group is what would be needed to really
I wanted to swing by and thank everyone for keeping this conversation so
constructive. Many people like Larry, Michael and Matt have said exactly what I
would have loved to have said, but done it far more eloquently.
Sadly, I find the amount of victim blaming going on in here to be bizarre
