Re: [PSR-12] Moving Back to DRAFT Status

2018-05-17 Thread Larry Garfield
On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 3:45:23 AM EDT Alessandro Lai wrote:
> The PSR will follow its normal course: the WG has already discussed a few
> thing that are needed to be fixed, and appropriate PRs will be submitted.
> After that, a new review vote will be held, and the PSR will go back into
> review phase.

When it comes back for another Review round, please include a textual 
description of what's changed as well as a link to the proper diff.  That will 
make it much easier to see what has and hasn't changed, given that it's a 
fairly long spec.

Merci bien!

--Larry Garfield

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP 
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/2243651.DrKQXAGrPF%40vulcan.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [PSR-12] Moving Back to DRAFT Status

2018-05-16 Thread Alessandro Lai
The PSR will follow its normal course: the WG has already discussed a few 
thing that are needed to be fixed, and appropriate PRs will be submitted. 
After that, a new review vote will be held, and the PSR will go back into 
review phase.

Il giorno mercoledì 16 maggio 2018 05:42:24 UTC+2, Adrien Crivelli ha 
scritto:
>
> This is a good news. I hope that this new draft status will allow us to 
> focus on *simplicity and consistency* within the spec (as opposed to with 
> existing code base). Even if that means "breaking" code out there, or even 
> breaking with PSR-2. This would be for the best in the long term. Of course 
> the `declare()` whitespace comes to mind, but I am sure that there other 
> things.
>
> Is there any specific plan on what the next move will be ? and who should 
> be involved ? and how ?
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP 
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/942fcf92-439a-43a8-aa1b-92f3fdf9f298%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [PSR-12] Moving Back to DRAFT Status

2018-05-15 Thread Adrien Crivelli
This is a good news. I hope that this new draft status will allow us to 
focus on *simplicity and consistency* within the spec (as opposed to with 
existing code base). Even if that means "breaking" code out there, or even 
breaking with PSR-2. This would be for the best in the long term. Of course 
the `declare()` whitespace comes to mind, but I am sure that there other 
things.

Is there any specific plan on what the next move will be ? and who should 
be involved ? and how ?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP 
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/025275a1-94d7-4a17-be77-cf7223170e4c%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [PSR-12] Moving Back to DRAFT Status

2018-05-15 Thread Joe T.
This is, frankly, a relief.

i hope this will open more discussion. i think there have been several well 
informed and reasonable responses (by others) that should be considered 
during this new draft period. Directly confronting the poll-result origins 
of the original standards, filling in gaps, settling inconsistencies...

Anyway, i'm grateful for this course of action. If there's some way i can 
contribute, i welcome the opportunity.
-joe t.


On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 12:51:43 UTC-4, Chris Tankersley wrote:
>
> Hello FIG!
>
> The working group for PSR-12 has decided to move the PSR back into draft 
> status, as per a meeting of the PSR-12 working group that was done on May 
> 3rd. The group has decided that there are some additional changes that need 
> to be made to the spec, which necessitates the PSR being moved back to 
> Draft status.
>
> There are some questions with regards to parenthesis and language 
> constructs which need to be addressed. A few other PRs were talked about 
> that dealt with what we feel are personal preferences, and we want to try 
> to avoid adding them during this new draft phase. A few other areas have 
> been deemed to need additional examples and clarifications.
>
> As the Sponsor, I'm formally moving the PSR back into Draft status. 
>
> - Chris Tankersley and PSR-12 working group
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP 
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/ffd8daf9-0b05-4580-b2bf-c2753b79652a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.