Dear List -
My mysqli extension seems to have gone away.
$host = 'localhost';
$user = 'root';
$password = 'SdR3908';
echo hello2br /;
var_dump(function_exists('mysqli_connect'));// this returns boo(false)
$db = 'Store';
$cxn = mysqli_connect($host,$user,$password,$db);
I tried to reinstall
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Ethan Rosenberg
erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com wrote:
Dear List -
My mysqli extension seems to have gone away.
$host = 'localhost';
$user = 'root';
$password = 'SdR3908';
echo hello2br /;
var_dump(function_exists('**mysqli_connect'));// this returns
Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
Dear List -
My
mysqli extension seems to have gone away.
$host =
'localhost';
$user = 'root';
$password = 'SdR3908';
echo hello2br /;
var_dump(function_exists('mysqli_connect'));// this returns boo(false)
$db = 'Store';
$cxn =
Curtis Maurand cur...@maurand.com wrote:
Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
Dear List -
My
mysqli extension seems to have gone away.
$host =
'localhost';
$user = 'root';
$password = 'SdR3908';
echo hello2br /;
var_dump(function_exists('mysqli_connect'));// this returns boo(false)
$db =
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
Curtis Maurand cur...@maurand.com wrote:
Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
Dear List -
My
mysqli extension seems to have gone away.
$host =
'localhost';
$user = 'root';
$password = 'SdR3908';
echo
Matijn Woudt tijn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
Curtis Maurand cur...@maurand.com wrote:
Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
Dear List -
My
mysqli extension seems to have gone away.
$host =
'localhost';
$user =
On Aug 19, 2013 2:32 PM, Ethan Rosenberg erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com
wrote:
Dear List -
My mysqli extension seems to have gone away.
(REACTED)
Remember: avoid putting passwords - especially for root users - on a
public mailing list, which is also permanently archived.
echo hello2br
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
Matijn Woudt tijn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
Curtis Maurand cur...@maurand.com wrote:
Ethan Rosenberg wrote:
Dear List
Matijn Woudt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Ashley
Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
Matijn Woudt
tijn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at
8:55 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
Curtis
Maurand cur...@maurand.com wrote:
Ethan
Matijn Woudt wrote:
apt-get install php5-mysql
Just to elaborate on that ... php5-common and php5-cli does not include a number
of modules that need to be loaded separately. Choosing one of the database
modules is not the only thing that may need to be added to your list of
additional
Anyone? I have not been able to find a solution online.
On 4/1/2013 11:33 AM, Jay Blanchard wrote:
I am putting together an application where we are almost exclusively
using stored procedures in MySQL because most of the heavy lifting (as
it should be) is done in the database.
I have exactly
I am putting together an application where we are almost exclusively
using stored procedures in MySQL because most of the heavy lifting (as
it should be) is done in the database.
I have exactly one situation where I need to execute a stored procedure
and while returning the results if I run a
I read about the subject in another thread.
Where does PDO fit?
That is what I have used for sometime. Am I good?
--
Stephen
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Stephen stephe...@rogers.com wrote:
I read about the subject in another thread.
Where does PDO fit?
That is what I have used for sometime. Am I good?
Right as rain. PDO is a preferred abstraction layer in PHP and
isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
--
Not sure if this is the correct mailing list to be asking this question
but here goes:
I've got a prepared statement.
$stmt = $dbh-prepare (insert into test values (?, ?))
or die (Error: . $dbh-error);
$stmt-bind_param ('ii', $var1, $var2)
or die (Error: . $dbh-error);
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Peet Grobler p...@hivemind.net wrote:
Not sure if this is the correct mailing list to be asking this question
but here goes:
I've got a prepared statement.
$stmt = $dbh-prepare (insert into test values (?, ?))
or die (Error: . $dbh-error);
On 2011-11-13 1:42 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
or db_error ($dbh, $__FILE__, $__LINE__);
__FILE__ are reserved keywords __LINE__. If you intended to use
variables represent the similar meaning, the suggested approach would
Yes, sorry, was a bit quick there - I'm using __FILE__ __LINE__ to
Is it possible to get the actual sql that is being used to query or
update the database?
E.g
$sth = $dbh-prepare (update table set field=?, field2=? where id=?);
mysqli_bind_param ($sth, 'ssi', 'text1', 'text2', 10);
$sth-execute();
Something like $sth-sql? Or $dbh-sql?
I want to see update
On 31.08.2011 11:23, Peet Grobler wrote:
Is it possible to get the actual sql that is being used to query or
update the database?
E.g
$sth = $dbh-prepare (update table set field=?, field2=? where id=?);
mysqli_bind_param ($sth, 'ssi', 'text1', 'text2', 10);
$sth-execute();
Something like
On 08/31/2011 05:23 AM, Peet Grobler wrote:
Is it possible to get the actual sql that is being used to query or
update the database?
E.g
$sth = $dbh-prepare (update table set field=?, field2=? where id=?);
mysqli_bind_param ($sth, 'ssi', 'text1', 'text2', 10);
$sth-execute();
Something
On 8/31/2011 1:38 PM, John Black wrote:
Hi Peet,
not sure if there is a method to echo the sql but you can set your
development MySQL server to log all queries to a log file.
Use the log file with tail and you'll get a live view of all queries the
server attempts to process.
I already
, August 31, 2011 4:24 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] mysqli sql question
Is it possible to get the actual sql that is being used to query or
update the database?
E.g
$sth = $dbh-prepare (update table set field=?, field2=? where id=?);
mysqli_bind_param ($sth, 'ssi', 'text1', 'text2
Okay, so I've finally got an opportunity to start converting our code to
use Mysqli instead of the old mysql_* functions. Mysqli is new to me, but
I thought things were going well until the first time I tried to run a
query with a syntax error in it, and it threw up a PHP warning. Being that
So I have:
$result = $dbh-query (select * from roles order by name);
$row = mysqli_fetch_object ($result);
function process_field ($which) {
// This fails, I need to know how to do this the right way
if ($row-may_$which == 'Y') {
// Print stuff
} else {
Hello,
On http://www.php.net/manual/en/mysqli.constants.php there are some predefined
constants for MYSQLI_TYPE_TINY_BLOB, MYSQLI_TYPE_MEDIUM_BLOB,
MYSQLI_TYPE_LONG_BLOB, and MYSQLI_TYPE_BLOB. Through some experimentation I
have found that fields in my MySQL database that are declared as
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:49, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
I run a local mirror of the PHP manual, and I most often go straight to
the Search for box to look up the format of a function. With the
mysqli functions, I've found than many of them simply
aren't available that way. E.g.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 06:48, Daniel Egeberg degeb...@php.net wrote:
Hi Per,
The manual already supports that. If you install the sqlite extension
on your webserver, it should work.
Dan;
The question wasn't whether or not it supports that kind of
lookup, but rather why it's not
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 02:49, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
I run a local mirror of the PHP manual, and I most often go straight to
the Search for box to look up the format of a function. With the
mysqli functions, I've found than many of them simply
aren't available that way. E.g.
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 02:49, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
I run a local mirror of the PHP manual, and I most often go straight
to the Search for box to look up the format of a function. With
the mysqli functions, I've found than many of them simply
aren't
I run a local mirror of the PHP manual, and I most often go straight to
the Search for box to look up the format of a function. With the
mysqli functions, I've found than many of them simply
aren't available that way. E.g. mysqli_connect() - Sorry, but the
function mysqli_connect is not in the
If I am using the mysqli extension and prepared statements, after I
execute bind_param, is there a away to print the actual query that gets
sent to the server?
--
Chris W
KE5GIX
Protect your digital freedom and privacy, eliminate DRM,
learn more at
Hi,
Kyle Terry wrote:
Why don't you want to bind the results?
thats poor programming style and bad performance (dozends of bind
calls). Since there is a method fetch_row(), then why shouldn't I use
it? It is a bit strange that I cannot find any example for its use
besides in conjunction
Hello,
I have a small piece of code where I'm trying to use mysqli with a
prepare-statement. I don't want to bind variables for the fetch, instead
I want to use something like
list($question) = $stmt-fetch_row();
And this fetch_row should exist according to the documentation. But
while
You prepare the statement, execute it then use -fetch() to get the
data.
On Oct 22, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Marten Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a small piece of code where I'm trying to use mysqli with a
prepare-statement. I don't want to bind variables for the fetch,
Hi,
You prepare the statement, execute it then use -fetch() to get the data.
but the documentation says, that -fetch() is only to fetch data to
variables that have been bound with bind_result() before. But I want to
use fetch_row() instead.
Regards
Marten
--
PHP General Mailing List
Jason Pruim wrote:
No political undertones in this one I promise! :)
Attempting to setup a prepared statement in php that will update a
record in a mysql database using mysqli
Here is the relevant code:
$stmt = mysqli_stmt_init($link);
mysqli_stmt_prepare($stmt, UPDATE purl.schreur
No political undertones in this one I promise! :)
Attempting to setup a prepared statement in php that will update a
record in a mysql database using mysqli
Here is the relevant code:
$stmt = mysqli_stmt_init($link);
mysqli_stmt_prepare($stmt, UPDATE purl.schreur (FName, LName,
On 11 Sep 2008, at 16:15, Jason Pruim wrote:
Attempting to setup a prepared statement in php that will update a
record in a mysql database using mysqli
Here is the relevant code:
$stmt = mysqli_stmt_init($link);
mysqli_stmt_prepare($stmt, UPDATE purl.schreur (FName, LName,
email,
Jason Pruim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No political undertones in this one I promise! :)
Attempting to setup a prepared statement in php that will update a
record in a mysql database using mysqli
Here is the relevant code:
$stmt = mysqli_stmt_init($link);
On Sep 11, 2008, at 11:29 AM, Wolf wrote:
Jason Pruim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No political undertones in this one I promise! :)
Attempting to setup a prepared statement in php that will update a
record in a mysql database using mysqli
Here is the relevant code:
$stmt =
On 11 Sep 2008, at 16:29, Wolf wrote:
Jason Pruim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No political undertones in this one I promise! :)
Attempting to setup a prepared statement in php that will update a
record in a mysql database using mysqli
Here is the relevant code:
$stmt =
!-- SNIP --
Attempting to setup a prepared statement in php that will update a
record in a mysql database using mysqli
Here is the relevant code:
$stmt = mysqli_stmt_init($link);
mysqli_stmt_prepare($stmt, UPDATE purl.schreur (FName, LName,
email,
phone, record, subscribed,
On Sep 11, 2008, at 11:23 AM, Stut wrote:
On 11 Sep 2008, at 16:15, Jason Pruim wrote:
Attempting to setup a prepared statement in php that will update a
record in a mysql database using mysqli
Here is the relevant code:
$stmt = mysqli_stmt_init($link);
mysqli_stmt_prepare($stmt,
On 11 Sep 2008, at 17:08, Jason Pruim wrote:
On Sep 11, 2008, at 11:23 AM, Stut wrote:
On 11 Sep 2008, at 16:15, Jason Pruim wrote:
Attempting to setup a prepared statement in php that will update
a record in a mysql database using mysqli
Here is the relevant code:
$stmt =
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Jason Pruim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 11, 2008, at 11:23 AM, Stut wrote:
On 11 Sep 2008, at 16:15, Jason Pruim wrote:
Attempting to setup a prepared statement in php that will update a record
in a mysql database using mysqli
Here is the relevant
Hey there
I have been toying around with the following code for a few days:
?php
//Gets the tokens defined in the array $tokensToGet, with the language
defined by $languageId
public static function GetTokens($tokensToGet, $languageId)
{
$query =
@SELECT
Name,
Hey there
I have been toying around with the following code for a few days:
?php
//Gets the tokens defined in the array $tokensToGet, with the language
defined by $languageId
public static function GetTokens($tokensToGet, $languageId)
{
$query =
@SELECT
Name,
Value
FROM
Hi
How can we enable php-mysqli support on linux machine using yum etc.,
without reinstalling php again?
Also how to check it - Is php-mysqli package is present or not?
Thanks
Kapil
Kapil Kapil wrote:
Hi
How can we enable php-mysqli support on linux machine using yum etc.,
without reinstalling php again?
Just install the appropriate package.
Also how to check it - Is php-mysqli package is present or not?
Check output from phpinfo().
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
PHP
Robert Cummings wrote:
I can't remember what sort of environment the OP was in, but if any
sort of organised testing is done, the use of two different APIs will
just about double the test-effort. Which is why I still think the
best option is to mandate _one_ of the APIs and choose your
On Dec 12, 2007 4:47 AM, Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
I can't remember what sort of environment the OP was in, but if any
sort of organised testing is done, the use of two different APIs will
just about double the test-effort. Which is why I still think the
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 10:47 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
I can't remember what sort of environment the OP was in, but if any
sort of organised testing is done, the use of two different APIs will
just about double the test-effort. Which is why I still think the
best
You use a session variable for that?
Why not?
That's entirely the wrong place to
store something like which database API is installed.
Not really. You could even wrap a function called (for example)
Feature() around it.
It should a class
variable or global configuration variable. Heck,
Richard Heyes wrote:
You use a session variable for that?
Why not?
Because it's not user data, it's server data.
That's entirely the wrong place to
store something like which database API is installed.
Not really. You could even wrap a function called (for example)
Feature() around it.
Stut wrote:
Richard Heyes wrote:
You use a session variable for that?
Why not?
Because it's not user data, it's server data.
That's entirely the wrong place to
store something like which database API is installed.
Not really. You could even wrap a function called (for example)
Stut wrote:
However, I'd expect a stat on that
file will be more expensive than calling extension_loaded.
Difficult to say, but a stat() is cheap, especially if the inode is
cached already.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
Because it's not user data, it's server data.
So? It's there - use it.
That's entirely the wrong place to
store something like which database API is installed.
Not really. You could even wrap a function called (for example)
Feature() around it.
Yeah, really. Sessions are for user data.
Richard Heyes wrote:
Because it's not user data, it's server data.
So? It's there - use it.
So are cookies, would you stuff this into a cookie? No, because that's
not what cookies are there for.
Because it's there is never a good reason to do something.
That's entirely the wrong place
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:25 +, Stut wrote:
Richard Heyes wrote:
Because it's not user data, it's server data.
So? It's there - use it.
So are cookies, would you stuff this into a cookie? No, because that's
not what cookies are there for.
Because it's there is never a good
So? It's there - use it.
So are cookies, would you stuff this into a cookie? No, because that's
not what cookies are there for.
Not because it's not what cookies are for - but because sessions are a
more efficient and easier to use storage medium.
You could potentially be pointlessly
Sre, sessions are for whatever you choose to put in them. That's
like saying bodies are for whatever a crazed murderer chooses to put in
them...
No it's not.
the statement is true, but it's not optimal.
Real life is rarely optimal.
--
Richard Heyes
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 16:31 +, Richard Heyes wrote:
Sre, sessions are for whatever you choose to put in them. That's
like saying bodies are for whatever a crazed murderer chooses to put in
them...
No it's not.
Yes it is. Neither is a good argument.
the statement is true,
Real life is rarely optimal.
That's not a valid excuse for taking the sloppy pig route to
development. Sloppy pig's give conscientious developers a bad name. And
when they use PHP to create their slop, they give PHP a bad name.
Well I err towards actually doing something useful. Businesses
Richard Heyes wrote:
Real life is rarely optimal.
That's not a valid excuse for taking the sloppy pig route to
development. Sloppy pig's give conscientious developers a bad name. And
when they use PHP to create their slop, they give PHP a bad name.
Well I err towards actually doing something
I don't see a reason to compromise. It would take no longer to call
extension_loaded on each page request than it will to put the variable
in the session. You're right in saying that there's a balance to be
struck, but in this particular case I personally see a right way and a
wrong way and no
Stut wrote:
I couldn't care less what your domain name is, you're still advocating
a poor choice IMHO.
I have been trying hard not to join this thread, but ... apart from the
principle, what's _really_ so poor about it? Having to write
application code that needs to work with two different
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:01 +, Richard Heyes wrote:
Real life is rarely optimal.
That's not a valid excuse for taking the sloppy pig route to
development. Sloppy pig's give conscientious developers a bad name. And
when they use PHP to create their slop, they give PHP a bad name.
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 18:14 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
Stut wrote:
I couldn't care less what your domain name is, you're still advocating
a poor choice IMHO.
I have been trying hard not to join this thread, but ... apart from the
principle, what's _really_ so poor about it? Having to
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 22:11 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 18:14 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
I have been trying hard not to join this thread, but ... apart from
the principle, what's _really_ so poor about it? Having to write
application code that
On Dec 11, 2007 4:11 PM, Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't remember what sort of environment the OP was in, but if any sort
of organised testing is done, the use of two different APIs will just
about double the test-effort. Which is why I still think the best
option is to mandate
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 18:14 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
I have been trying hard not to join this thread, but ... apart from
the principle, what's _really_ so poor about it? Having to write
application code that needs to work with two different APIs is poor
enough, using
On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Per Jessen wrote:
Stut wrote:
I couldn't care less what your domain name is, you're still advocating
a poor choice IMHO.
I have been trying hard not to join this thread, but ... apart from the
principle, what's _really_ so poor about it? Having to write
PHP List,
Based on what seemed to be good advice to switch to using mysqli for
interacting with a MySQL database, I built a content management system
that uses mysqli for all it's calls.
It works great on a lot of my servers. However, I just discovered that
one web hosting service I use
Dave M G wrote:
One is based on the assumption that mysqli is as likely not to be
available as it is to be installed. In this case I should write my
scripts to test whether it exists and then use either mysqli or
straight mysql commands as appropriate. If this is the way to go, what
do I do
One is based on the assumption that mysqli is as likely not to be
available as it is to be installed. In this case I should write my
scripts to test whether it exists and then use either mysqli or straight
mysql commands as appropriate. If this is the way to go, what do I do to
test for the
-Original Message-
From: Per Jessen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave M G wrote:
One is based on the assumption that mysqli is as likely not to be
available as it is to be installed. In this case I should write my
scripts to test whether it exists and then use either mysqli or
Richard, Per, Andres,
Thank you for responding.
If it were entirely my web site to dictate what to do with, I would just
switch for a server that has mysqli available to me.
However, in this one case, the web site is owned by a small, not very
profitable group that has reasons to stay with
2007. 12. 10, hétfő keltezéssel 21.58-kor Dave M G ezt írta:
Richard, Per, Andres,
Thank you for responding.
If it were entirely my web site to dictate what to do with, I would just
switch for a server that has mysqli available to me.
However, in this one case, the web site is owned by
Dave M G wrote:
Richard said:
Alter your program to support both - use mysqi if it's avilable,
mysql if it's not.
How exactly do I test for the presence of mysqli from within a script?
Or are you saying I have two different versions of my script?
I think you can test for the
How exactly do I test for the presence of mysqli from within a script?
IIRC there's a function called extension_loaded(). Or something similar.
Or are you saying I have two different versions of my script?
Not at all. Taking PEAR::DB for example, you could test for the
existence of
Richard Heyes wrote:
another. This is one of the reasons abstraction layers exist.
Which brings us to alternative #3 - odbc.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Dec 10, 2007 3:16 AM, Dave M G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which assumption should I be proceeding with?
Rather than assume (because we all know what happens then), why
not build for both scenarios? Here's an example of one way
?
// inc/include_files.php
#
# Includes all files
Per Jessen wrote:
Richard Heyes wrote:
another. This is one of the reasons abstraction layers exist.
Which brings us to alternative #3 - odbc.
That's probably less likely to be available than mysqli. If you're
targetting php5 then you could use pdo::mysql as well (and there's even
the
On Monday 10 December 2007, Dave M G wrote:
One is based on the assumption that mysqli is as likely not to be
available as it is to be installed. In this case I should write my
scripts to test whether it exists and then use either mysqli or straight
mysql commands as appropriate. If this is
Zoltan, Per, Richard, Chris, Daniel, Larry,
Thank you for responding.
I have created a method in the class that handles my database
connections that will first test on extension_loaded(mysqli) before
connecting to the database.
Then I store the result in a session variable for reference, so
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 13:02 +0900, Dave M G wrote:
Zoltan, Per, Richard, Chris, Daniel, Larry,
Thank you for responding.
I have created a method in the class that handles my database
connections that will first test on extension_loaded(mysqli) before
connecting to the database.
Then
On 16/05/07, Lee PHP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/** Insert record. */
public function insert() {
$sql = INSERT INTO table ( .
field_1, .
field_2, .
field_3) .
?, .
?, .
?);
Hi there,
I'm new to OO-PHP and have encountered a problem that I just can't
figure out. I have a class called DBAccess that extends mysqli. In a
nutshell, it looks like this:
class DBAccess extends mysqli {
private static $instance;
private static $preferences;
/** Create an instance
Lee PHP wrote:
Hi there,
I'm new to OO-PHP and have encountered a problem that I just can't
figure out. I have a class called DBAccess that extends mysqli. In a
nutshell, it looks like this:
snip
If I execute the following code:
$conn = DBAccess::getInstance();
Does that give you an
I have a couple of questions about php and accessing mysql 4.1 via
the mysqli interface.
I get the following warning on a script:
bWarning/b: mysqli::mysqli() [a href='function.mysqli/a]:
User jt_select has already more than 'max_user_connections' active
connections in
but this
On 1/5/06, Curt Zirzow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:31:02AM +0530, anirudh dutt wrote:
hi
the subject is pretty much what the problem is.
if i use
$st1 = $sql-stmt_init(); // $sql is a mysqli obj/conn
$st1-prepare(select `num` from `activity` where `id` = ?);
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 03:18:55AM +0530, anirudh dutt wrote:
On 1/5/06, Curt Zirzow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:31:02AM +0530, anirudh dutt wrote:
hi
the subject is pretty much what the problem is.
if i use
$st1 = $sql-stmt_init(); // $sql is a mysqli
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:31:02AM +0530, anirudh dutt wrote:
hi
the subject is pretty much what the problem is.
if i use
$st1 = $sql-stmt_init(); // $sql is a mysqli obj/conn
$st1-prepare(select `num` from `activity` where `id` = ?);
$st1-bind_param('s', $myid);
$myid =
hi
the subject is pretty much what the problem is.
if i use
$st1 = $sql-stmt_init(); // $sql is a mysqli obj/conn
$st1-prepare(select `num` from `activity` where `id` = ?);
$st1-bind_param('s', $myid);
$myid = '3f6d017d3e728b057bcc082a7db75a57'; // forcing value to check
$st1-execute();
PROTECTED]
To: Erik Saline [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] mysqli class not found
you are not missing anything, you are actually adding to much. Using new
is for making objects, if you take away the new in the $result
added extenstion=mysqli.so to my php.ini
Erik
- Original Message -
From: PHP Superman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Erik Saline [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] mysqli class not found
you are not missing
PHP Superman wrote:*
What OS are you using? I think that you entered the wrong filename. for
windows i use php_mysqli.dll . Somewhere in php.ini there is a list of
extensions you can use, uncomment the php_mysqli.dll , copy php_mysqli.dll
to the php install directory and change the php.ini
PHP Superman wrote:
Hold on, I heard that you can't run the mysql and mysqli php
extensions , try removing the mysql extension if my other advice
doesen't work
snip
Please reply to the list.
You can compile php with both.
From the manual :
http://us2.php.net/mysqli
If you would like to
On 12/28/05, Bagus Nugroho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is mysqli module enable by default on php 4 as mysql module.
No, because it's a PHP5 module (if you look at the documentation for
it, all the php.ini settings for it have only been available since
5.0.0).
If not enable by default, where I can
- Original Message -
From: Erik Saline
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:08 PM
I installed Apache, PHP, and Mysql during the Fedora Core 4 installation.
PHP 5.0.4
MYSQL 4.1.14
I used php -i to show that mysql and mysqli were installed.
Configure
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
