actually u can explicitly turn on registered globals with a setting in
a .htaccess file
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
current ISP has been here.
thx,
Neil
behaviour is caused, and the causes are many
- Original Message -
From: Justin French [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dan Phiffer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Old version of PHP
On Friday
On 08 August 2003 19:00, Jason Wong wrote:
Whereas changelog, history, release notes will summarise what bugs
were fixed between versions. None of these resources are called
errata although some linux distros may present these as erratum
(plural?).
Well, since you ask, erratum is the
On Saturday 09 August 2003 01:46, Dan Phiffer wrote:
I appreciate the (rather indirect) pointer to the PHP bug tracking site - I
didn't know about that. Errata, it seems to me anyway, perform a different
purpose. I don't mind RTFM-style responses, but please at least read my
question more
On Friday 08 August 2003 09:43, Justin French wrote:
i think the best reason to keep up-to-date on the versions is that each
new release is better, more stable, etc etc... i haven't ever heard
anyone on this list say i prefer 4.2.3 over 4.2.4 :)
But each new release brings new problems and a
On Saturday 09 August 2003 00:54, Dan Phiffer wrote:
Thanks for all the feedback, guys. Is there an errata page somewhere that
lists known bugs in the PHP interpretter?
google php bugs
--
Jason Wong - Gremlins Associates - www.gremlins.biz
Open Source Software Systems Integrators
* Web
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 10:28 AM, Neil Davis wrote:
Fellas,
can't see how this should be an issue.
It is a security issue. Most ISP's don't allow register_globals to be
turned
on. Read the php docs about register_globals. Zeev and company explain
it
better than I can.
Thanks for all the feedback, guys. Is there an errata page somewhere
lists known bugs in the PHP interpretter?
google php bugs
I appreciate the (rather indirect) pointer to the PHP bug tracking site - I
didn't know about that. Errata, it seems to me anyway, perform a different
a bit misleading since
that page serves more purposes than simply reporting bugs.
Okay enough of my bitching,
-Dan
- Original Message -
From: Jason Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: php.general
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Old version
Thanks for all the feedback, guys. Is there an errata page somewhere that
lists known bugs in the PHP interpretter?
Thanks,
-Dan
Jason Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 08 August 2003 09:43, Justin French wrote:
i think the best reason to keep
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 09:21 AM, Dan Phiffer wrote:
I'm working on an ongoing project that depends on a shared webserver
running
an old version of PHP (4.1.2 I believe). Is there any good reason to
stick
with an older version of PHP, or might it be a valid suggestion to
have
Hello,
I'm working on an ongoing project that depends on a shared webserver running
an old version of PHP (4.1.2 I believe). Is there any good reason to stick
with an older version of PHP, or might it be a valid suggestion to have it
upgraded to something a bit more recent? I have a notion
* Thus wrote Ford, Mike [LSS] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
(There are also words in English derived from Greek which have singular ending -on
and plural ending -a -- notably criterion/criteria. Microsoft doesn't understand
this, and gets it tooth-jarringly wrong all over Excel and
13 matches
Mail list logo