Example/working code here:
https://gist.github.com/mhulse/5833826
Couple questions:
1. Is there anything wrong with the way I'm using the abstract class?
If so, how could I improve the logic/setup?
2. Is there a way for me to pass $foo to the parent class, from the
child, without having to
Andrei wrote:
Hi list,
I have a class which I use to parse simple bbcode inside some comments.
I noticed on PHP5 that scope of preg_replace function is changed
when function is called inside a class. To the point:
[CODE]
class PHS_editor
{
...
function parse_content( $str
Stut wrote:
Andrei wrote:
Hi list,
I have a class which I use to parse simple bbcode inside some
comments.
I noticed on PHP5 that scope of preg_replace function is changed
when function is called inside a class. To the point:
[CODE]
class PHS_editor
{
...
Ok, I have seen many different examples of OOP, but nothing quite like this.
Someone was showing me syntax for Ruby the other day, and it got me thinking, wouldn't it be neat to
imitate ruby, or be it a little more generic, dot notation for OOP ways of calling methods like
Java, javascript,
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 23:22 -0700, Jim Lucas wrote:
Has anybody else seen this style of syntax?
http://5ive.uwc.ac.za/index.php?module=blogaction=viewsinglepostid=init_8059_1163957717userid=5729061010
I don't think that its really useful for anything, except maybe creating
overly complex SQL
Paul Scott wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 23:22 -0700, Jim Lucas wrote:
Has anybody else seen this style of syntax?
http://5ive.uwc.ac.za/index.php?module=blogaction=viewsinglepostid=init_8059_1163957717userid=5729061010
I don't think that its really useful for anything, except maybe creating
Paul Scott wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 23:22 -0700, Jim Lucas wrote:
Has anybody else seen this style of syntax?
http://5ive.uwc.ac.za/index.php?module=blogaction=viewsinglepostid=init_8059_1163957717userid=5729061010
I don't think that its really useful for anything, except maybe creating
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-04-11 23:36:56 -0700:
Paul Scott wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 23:22 -0700, Jim Lucas wrote:
Has anybody else seen this style of syntax?
I don't think that its really useful for anything, except maybe creating
overly complex SQL queries.
What about using it for
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-04-11 23:44:16 -0700:
Paul Scott wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 23:22 -0700, Jim Lucas wrote:
Has anybody else seen this style of syntax?
http://5ive.uwc.ac.za/index.php?module=blogaction=viewsinglepostid=init_8059_1163957717userid=5729061010
I don't think that
I've seen it referred to as a Fluent Interface. I built one just
to see how hard it was, using a standard problem: data validation.
The results were promising.
I combined it with an object designed to work as a factory for an
internally stored decorator pattern.
Class Input was the
I suppose I should have summarized what I learned from that
experiment, putting myself more squarely on topic: Simply put, a
Fluent interface let me move from
$_input-addCheck('Integer');
$_input-addCheck('Range',3,9);
$_input-addCheck('NonEmpty');
to
$_input-addCheck('Integer')
nice write up. :-)
Tim Stiles wrote:
I suppose I should have summarized what I learned from that experiment,
putting myself more squarely on topic: Simply put, a Fluent interface
let me move from
/snip
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
a) I don't see how the part about the dot notation has anything to
do with the class presetned
b) I don't see any benefit to the class presented
c) Trying to follow the chain of - operators and method calls just
gave me a headache.
Other than that, it's really nifty. :-v
On Thu, April 12, 2007
I have never heard that described as a fluent interface before, but you'd
probably like jQuery. :-) It's a javascript library that uses much the same
concept, although it refers to it as function chaining. It also operates
on multiple objects simultaneously, which is even niftier.
On
I have a class
class XMLRule
{
...
}
And many of these:
class is_username extends XMLRule
{
}
class is_device extends XMLRule
{
}
Is there a way in PHP5 to get a list of all the 'extends' classes I have
Any recommendations on the best PHP5 OOP book to get? I have Advanced PHP
Programming by George Schlossnagle. It's turning out to be a great book,
but I'd like to read more on PHP5 OOP. The first chapter recommends two
books, but both deal with OOP from the perspective of C++, C#, and Perl.
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:09:57 -0700, Ed Lazor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any recommendations on the best PHP5 OOP book to get? I have Advanced PHP
Programming by George Schlossnagle. It's turning out to be a great book,
but I'd like to read more on PHP5 OOP. The first chapter recommends two
Greg Donald wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:09:57 -0700, Ed Lazor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any recommendations on the best PHP5 OOP book to get? I have Advanced PHP
Programming by George Schlossnagle. It's turning out to be a great book,
but I'd like to read more on PHP5 OOP. The first chapter
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:09:57 -0700, Ed Lazor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any recommendations on the best PHP5 OOP book to get? I have Advanced PHP
Programming by George Schlossnagle. It's turning out to be a great book,
but I'd like to read more on PHP5 OOP. The first chapter recommends two
books,
Thanks everyone for the recommendations =)
-Original Message-
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:09:57 -0700, Ed Lazor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any recommendations on the best PHP5 OOP book to get? I have Advanced
PHP
Programming by George Schlossnagle. It's turning out to be a great book,
Hello, I'm trying to get the hang of OOP here but can't quite figure
out how to relate these classes. I've got one for the main project,
one for the database, and one for a user. Somehow I need to get the
user access to the database, without cumbersome constructor calls
involving a copy of the
Hello, I'm trying to get the hang of OOP here but can't quite figure
out how to relate these classes. I've got one for the main project,
one for the database, and one for a user. Somehow I need to get the
user access to the database, without cumbersome constructor calls
involving a copy of
From: Joel Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, I'm trying to get the hang of OOP here but can't quite figure
out how to relate these classes. I've got one for the main project,
one for the database, and one for a user. Somehow I need to get the
user access to the database, without cumbersome
Hello Group,
I would like to know which one is the most appropriate
way to implement the following scenario.
For example, I want to display a products catalogue of
100 products. I do have a base class of product which
contains all the basic property of the product
(Product title, product
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 22:29, Hardik Doshi wrote:
Hello Group,
I would like to know which one is the most appropriate
way to implement the following scenario.
For example, I want to display a products catalogue of
100 products. I do have a base class of product which
contains all the
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 19:29, Hardik Doshi wrote:
Hello Group,
I would like to know which one is the most appropriate
way to implement the following scenario.
For example, I want to display a products catalogue of
100 products. I do have a base class of product which
contains all the
* Thus wrote Hardik Doshi:
Hello Group,
I would like to know which one is the most appropriate
way to implement the following scenario.
For example, I want to display a products catalogue of
100 products. I do have a base class of product which
contains all the basic property of the
27 matches
Mail list logo
