Search for "PHP defense" in the subject line for a thread that is/was
running since a few days ago.
Satyam
"Reynier Perez Mira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi list:
I have a problem with ASP .NET community in my Universty and I need to solve
it. The thing is th
this is addressed in quite a few dedicated articles in php sites.
For me some of the big pros of PHP:
- the active community behind it
- associated open source products (such as phpMyAdmin and the Smarty
template engine)
- the ease and power behind coupling it with MySQL databases (ASP has of
cour
"Anthony Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> How does PHP differs from ASP?
search google on "php vs asp" ...
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Liz Lynch wrote:
> can someone tell me whether or not asp can be used with mysql and is there any
>drawbacks to using it as opposed to php
>
>
Yes it can be used - no there are no real drawbacks other than that most
documentation for ASP work assumes SQL Server or Access, so many
tutorials
John Meyer
Q: What do you do if your linux server crashes.
A: First, find a candle...*G*
> Original Message Follows
> From: Mike Eheler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP vs. ASP
> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 10:57:27 -0800
>
>
Typically, when people talk about 'native' database access, they're
referring to accessing the database using the database's native interface,
not that the language directly supports the database. (i.e.: not limiting
everything to the lowest common denominator). The advantage you get from
native
> I actually was going to mention it, because I know it's being worked on
> - last I read it was 'beta' or something similar, and only supported a
> handful. My understanding was that even it was still a wrapper system,
> but it's definitely a welcome (huge) step in the right direction, in our
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>>Databases - although PHP 'supports' many databases natively, the support
>>is in the form of 3rd party libraries with PHP wrapper functions.
>>Nothing inherently wrong with that, but the current method dictates that
>>to use oracle you use oci_ functions, for mysql you
> Databases - although PHP 'supports' many databases natively, the support
> is in the form of 3rd party libraries with PHP wrapper functions.
> Nothing inherently wrong with that, but the current method dictates that
> to use oracle you use oci_ functions, for mysql you use mysql_
> functions
ction
--- END SAMPLE CODE ---
Original Message Follows
From: Mike Eheler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP vs. ASP
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 10:57:27 -0800
Well being a former ASP programmer and a current PHP programmer I think
I can help you there.
The k
Sorry,
"corrected on PHP only after 15 being reported.." should read:
"corrected on PHP only after 15 minutes being reported.."
That was a good thing I saw. I still remember, some exec() problems with
slashes and some letters on a specific plataform. Stunned me how fast the
bug was solved.
Well being a former ASP programmer and a current PHP programmer I think
I can help you there.
The key point is ease of use. PHP provides far more functionality than
ASP (try finding a function to print out the date in ASP.. yeah, I
thought so), while at the same time giving you access to low-l
Off course PHP does support Oracle and the like. What I wanted to say is
that PHP support most common databases, but if your company needs support
for some strange database you can't access it very fast and easily
(especially when you use PHP on Unix). On the other hand with ASP you can
access any
re-usable windows/web UIs.
Big downside? Has to run on MS platform.
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Abshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 January 2002 17:27
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs. ASP
>
>
> I agree about not starting a w
om: Philip Hallstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Robert Klinkenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP vs. ASP
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 08:51:40 -0800 (PST)
I don't want to start a war, but last time I looked PHP had native support
for every database I'd
Philip Hallstrom wrote:
> I don't want to start a war, but last time I looked PHP had native support
> for every database I'd ever heard of including Oracle, SQLServer, etc...
>
> Just don't want the guy doing the report that php is database limited...
>
"Native" support can mean different th
I don't want to start a war, but last time I looked PHP had native support
for every database I'd ever heard of including Oracle, SQLServer, etc...
Just don't want the guy doing the report that php is database limited...
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Robert Klinkenberg wrote:
> Well, I personally prefer
Well, I don't know ASP, but I fonud that learning PHP was really easy when
you already know C, C++ And no variables types, pointer, etc ... is
great !!!
Le Mercredi 9 Janvier 2002 17:01, Dean Ouellette a écrit :
> I am a newbie to programming, ASP is easier to learn? I heard PHP was
>
>
I am a newbie to programming, ASP is easier to learn? I heard PHP was
At 04:48 PM 1/9/2002 +0100, Robert Klinkenberg wrote:
>Well, I personally prefer PHP over ASP because better support from
>webhosting companies, but ASP has some good points.
>This is especially the case if you can setup the
Well, I personally prefer PHP over ASP because better support from
webhosting companies, but ASP has some good points.
This is especially the case if you can setup the complete hosting
environment yourself and have some money to spend.
First of all databases. PHP has support for a limited but int
Database is a good point. PHP has native support for several, while I
believe ASP do not (through ODBC).
Modules, and their price. At least I heard in ASP you have to pay for some
of them (well, more than those on PHP).
Typecast? I am not sure if in ASP you have to, I remember I heard
some
21 matches
Mail list logo
