Waynn Lue wrote:
I'm running some command-line scripts that are taking more and more
arguments, and I'm wondering whether anyone's used a good flags package for
PHP? Support for string/int/boolean arguments would be nice, otherwise I'll
just hack together my own.
http://pear.php.net/package/Co
I'm running some command-line scripts that are taking more and more
arguments, and I'm wondering whether anyone's used a good flags package for
PHP? Support for string/int/boolean arguments would be nice, otherwise I'll
just hack together my own.
Thanks for any advice,
Waynn
You are REALLY "drive traffic", "spam", "SEO" experts. They are beyond my
mind. The topic being here is just because the news is each national site's
cover story and every mate talked about it.
2. Not a place to "DRIVE TRAFFIC". My English is still at preliminary school
level, you see. (should be p
via e-mail? lol - speaking of which doubt many would visit the site anyway
:)... oh wait, the archive... is it indexed by Google?
2008/10/16 Ashley Sheridan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 16:38 -0400, Wolf wrote:
>
> > > > This is extremely off-topic. Please don't abuse this list in
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Ashley Sheridan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I apologise then. I thought it was spam, sorry.
Quit apologizing until you've done something wrong, Sheridan. ;-P
--
More full-root dedicated server packages:
Intel 2.4GHz/60GB/512MB/2TB $49.99/mo.
Intel 3.06GH
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 19:17 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Ashley Sheridan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I think the PHP part of the URL was added by the mailing list. Short of
> > that, I think it's just some schmuck trying to boost his/her SEO
> > ranking.
>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Ashley Sheridan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think the PHP part of the URL was added by the mailing list. Short of
> that, I think it's just some schmuck trying to boost his/her SEO
> ranking.
"Shelly" has been here for over a year, on and off, and I think
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 16:38 -0400, Wolf wrote:
> > > This is extremely off-topic. Please don't abuse this list in an attempt
> > > to drive traffic to your blog.
> > >
> > > -Stut
> > >
> >
> > It *is* powered by PHP, Stut. :P
> >
>
> True, but that's the ONLY PHP thing about it... OK, and
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 15:36 -0600, Govinda wrote:
> >>>
> >>> improvement if I went for static URLs on the site, but I don't
> >>> have any
> >>> evidence for that, and I'm willing to admit it.
> >> I'd rebuff this but it would feel like Im feeding a troll.
> >
> > choices:
> > 1 - Waste some ti
Govinda wrote:
improvement if I went for static URLs on the site, but I don't have any
evidence for that, and I'm willing to admit it.
I'd rebuff this but it would feel like Im feeding a troll.
choices:
1 - Waste some time on a live test to prove this
2 - Explain how I know this and show the
improvement if I went for static URLs on the site, but I don't
have any
evidence for that, and I'm willing to admit it.
I'd rebuff this but it would feel like Im feeding a troll.
choices:
1 - Waste some time on a live test to prove this
2 - Explain how I know this and show the historical ev
Jochem Maas wrote:
Ashley Sheridan schreef:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 11:22 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
Ashley Sheridan schreef:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 00:58 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 01:17 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
Nathan Rixham
> > This is extremely off-topic. Please don't abuse this list in an attempt
> > to drive traffic to your blog.
> >
> > -Stut
> >
>
> It *is* powered by PHP, Stut. :P
>
True, but that's the ONLY PHP thing about it... OK, and the URL has PHP in
it...
;)
Wolf
--
PHP General Mailing List (
Ashley Sheridan schreef:
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 11:22 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>> Jochem Maas wrote:
>>> Ashley Sheridan schreef:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 00:58 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 01:17 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
>>> Nathan
Stut wrote:
On 15 Oct 2008, at 14:53, Shelley wrote:
It will punish private Windows XP and Office 2003, Office 2007 users.
This is extremely off-topic. Please don't abuse this list in an attempt
to drive traffic to your blog.
-Stut
It *is* powered by PHP, Stut. :P
--
PHP General Maili
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 11:22 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Jochem Maas wrote:
> > Ashley Sheridan schreef:
> >> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 00:58 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >>> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 01:17 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
> > Nathan Rixham schreef:
> >> As
> You encrypt stuff with a string that you keep secret. That string is needed
> to decrypt the string.
I recommend you change that string once in a while.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Oct 15, 2008, at 1:21 PM, Yeti wrote:
You encrypt stuff with a string that you keep secret. That string
is needed to decrypt the string.
I recommend you change that string once in a while.
Also, picking up a copy of:
Essential PHP Security
by Chris Shiflett
# ISBN-10: 059600656X
# ISBN-
On 15 Oct 2008, at 18:21, Yeti wrote:
You encrypt stuff with a string that you keep secret. That string
is needed to decrypt the string.
I recommend you change that string once in a while.
That's never a bad idea with any secret token, but bear in mind that
when you do all existing cookies
AGH!
Just got up, feel like I have a hangover which is not really fair because I
didnt drink so dont deserve one.
It really is screwed up, you pull an all nighter and when you get up you look
at the code you produced and it just isnt your best work... and the question
pops up, why bother?
S
Makes perfect sense. I have included this security in my script - thanks to
both of you for your help!
Cheers!
2008/10/15 Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 15 Oct 2008, at 16:04, Ben Stones wrote:
>
>> Can you explain to me the benefits of hashing/encrypting/md5'ing cookie
>> values? I don't see how
On 15 Oct 2008, at 16:04, Ben Stones wrote:
Can you explain to me the benefits of hashing/encrypting/md5'ing
cookie values? I don't see how it'd stop hackers from changing
cookie values?
You encrypt stuff with a string that you keep secret. That string is
needed to decrypt the string.
Wh
On 15 Oct 2008 at 16:04, Ben Stones wrote:
> Can you explain to me the benefits of hashing/encrypting/md5'ing cookie
> values? I don't see how it'd stop hackers from changing cookie values?
Hi,
You would keep a copy of the hash on the server and check that against the
submitted
value. If they
I've read a few videos on cookie security and it makes sense that people can
modify cookie values which is a problem I'm trying to figure out to *try*
and prevent. What I'll first do is at the top of the page that validates if
the cookie values is in the database, but what my next problem is they'd
Can you explain to me the benefits of hashing/encrypting/md5'ing cookie
values? I don't see how it'd stop hackers from changing cookie values?
2008/10/15 Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 15 Oct 2008, at 15:23, Ben Stones wrote:
>
>> I've read a few videos on cookie security and it makes sense that
On 15 Oct 2008, at 15:23, Ben Stones wrote:
I've read a few videos on cookie security and it makes sense that
people can
modify cookie values which is a problem I'm trying to figure out to
*try*
and prevent. What I'll first do is at the top of the page that
validates if
the cookie values is
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Ashley Sheridan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 19:15 -0300, Miles Thompson wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Dušan Novaković <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > I have some request to sent text to matrix printer to print ticket for
>> > t
On 15 Oct 2008, at 14:53, Shelley wrote:
It will punish private Windows XP and Office 2003, Office 2007 users.
This is extremely off-topic. Please don't abuse this list in an
attempt to drive traffic to your blog.
-Stut
--
http://stut.net/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:24 AM, Nathan Rixham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ryan S wrote:
>>
>> $uploaddir = 'C:\\wamp\\www\\ezee\\funny\\';
>
> delimited backslashes in a string that doesn't need delimited (single quotes
> not double.
>
> $uploaddir = 'C:\wamp\www\ezee\funny\';
>
> --
> nathan ( [
Per Jessen wrote:
> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>
>> Matrix printer? Is this an awesomely powerful matrix of multiple
>> printers high output printers?
>>
>> -Shawn
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_printer
>
>
> /Per Jessen, Zürich
>
Ha,ha, yes I know. My first printer was a
http://en.wikip
On Oct 15, 2008, at 7:18 AM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Jason Pruim wrote:
I probably should have mentioned that this was in a function to do
the heavy lifting for authentication :) I just didn't paste the
whole function since 90% of it worked just fine :)
Now I just need to get better and separ
Jason Pruim wrote:
I probably should have mentioned that this was in a function to do the
heavy lifting for authentication :) I just didn't paste the whole
function since 90% of it worked just fine :)
Now I just need to get better and separating presentation and code :)
very smiley today
Ryan S wrote:
Hey all,
am feeling a bit brain dead, pulled an all nighter and would appreciate some
help as have already wasted over 2hrs on this :(
just not thinking straight.
I got this script off the net, cant even remember where :( its basically to
resize an uploaded image (i have a script
On Oct 14, 2008, at 7:24 PM, Jochem Maas wrote:
Colin Guthrie schreef:
Jochem Maas wrote:
Jason Pruim schreef:
if(isset($_SESSION['userInfo']['loggedin']) &&
$_SESSION['userInfo']['loggedin'] == TRUE) {
Or, seeing as I'm a stickler for compact code:
me too, I also like to be able to chan
Ryan S wrote:
$uploaddir = 'C:\\wamp\\www\\ezee\\funny\\';
delimited backslashes in a string that doesn't need delimited (single
quotes not double.
$uploaddir = 'C:\wamp\www\ezee\funny\';
--
nathan ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
{
Senior Web Developer
php + java + flex + xmpp + xml + ecmascript
Jochem Maas wrote:
Ashley Sheridan schreef:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 00:58 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 01:17 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
Nathan Rixham schreef:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 14:54 -0700, Ryan S wrote:
quite a few sites
Jochem Maas wrote:
Colin Guthrie schreef:
if(!empty($_SESSION['userInfo']['loggedin'])) {
if (Sess::userLoggedIn()) { /* ... :-) */ }
Well, yes, that's how I do it in my apps too, but in internally in that
function you may want to use the empty() call :)
I agree that when checking for
Hey all,
am feeling a bit brain dead, pulled an all nighter and would appreciate some
help as have already wasted over 2hrs on this :(
just not thinking straight.
I got this script off the net, cant even remember where :( its basically to
resize an uploaded image (i have a script that does exact
Ashley Sheridan schreef:
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 00:58 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 01:17 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
Nathan Rixham schreef:
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 14:54 -0700, Ryan S wrote:
>>> quite a few
39 matches
Mail list logo
