Not exactly... I was not reffering to PHP files... The white spaces
from a template file will make double the size of certain files when
they are sent to the browser... So a page of 50 k might have 100 K
because of those white spaces instead of tabs... For a dial up
connection this means
On Thursday 15 April 2004 11:58 am, Chris Boget wrote:
Why does it sound totally wrong? A tab is a single character whereas
2 spaces are 2 characters.
1 x 50k = 50k
2 x 50k = 100k
Try the following code:
echo str_repeat( , 5 );
or
echo str_repeat( \t, 5 );
Remove all
Remove all whitespace from the final HTML, then all this doesn't matter.
function cleanFinalOutput($html){
$return = eregi_replace(\n, , $html);
$return = eregi_replace(\r, , $return);
return eregi_replace(\t, , $return);
}
Have already thought about this but would this not be too
function cleanFinalOutput($html){
$return = eregi_replace(\n, , $html);
$return = eregi_replace(\r, , $return);
return eregi_replace(\t, , $return);
}
Not to be too pedantic, but you could probably reduce the above
to a single line function:
function cleanFinalOutput($html){
return
Chris Boget mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:59 AM said:
Not exactly... I was not reffering to PHP files... The white spaces
from a template file will make double the size of certain files when
they are sent to the browser... So a page of 50 k might have 100 K
Arthur Radulescu mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, April 15, 2004 10:02 AM said:
Remove all whitespace from the final HTML, then all this doesn't
matter.
[snip function]
Have already thought about this but would this not be too time
consuming to process this replacement on evey
i guess you didn't read the second part of my email that started after
the ON THE OTHER HAND line.
Ok, yes, I am a retard. :)
Chris
-never mind me.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
1 - If we are talking about php code, it's irrelevant, in terms of size,
using spaces or tabs, because they are not part of output.
2 - If, on other and, we are talking about html created by the php code,
the case is completely different because output is parsed to the
browser, so size will
* Thus wrote Chris Boget ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
function cleanFinalOutput($html){
$return = eregi_replace(\n, , $html);
$return = eregi_replace(\r, , $return);
return eregi_replace(\t, , $return);
}
Not to be too pedantic, but you could probably reduce the above
to a single line
I think I am also sleeping :)
My conclusion is that:
- for html is better using tabs because by using spaces, it will
increase output to the browser;
- when coding php it's irrelevant because output is not parsed to browser.
Jorge | cloreto.com
--
PHP General Mailing List
On Thursday 15 April 2004 12:32 pm, Curt Zirzow wrote:
um.. preg_replace('/\s+/m', ' ', $html);
pre
btw,
blindly removing space (even from html) isn't a wise
thing todo.
/pre
The function I posted only removes tabs, newlines, and carriage returns. It
does not remove space
On Thursday 15 April 2004 12:02 pm, Arthur Radulescu wrote:
Have already thought about this but would this not be too time consuming to
process this replacement on evey hit?
I am using a version of fast template much improved on a site which is
already very overloaded so this would mean
On Thursday 15 April 2004 12:15 pm, Chris Boget wrote:
function cleanFinalOutput($html){
$return = eregi_replace(\n, , $html);
$return = eregi_replace(\r, , $return);
return eregi_replace(\t, , $return);
}
Not to be too pedantic, but you could probably reduce the above
to a
* Thus wrote Greg Donald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thursday 15 April 2004 12:32 pm, Curt Zirzow wrote:
um.. preg_replace('/\s+/m', ' ', $html);
pre
btw,
blindly removing space (even from html) isn't a wise
thing todo.
/pre
The function I posted only removes tabs, newlines,
On Thursday 15 April 2004 12:21 pm, Jorge Oliveira wrote:
I use spaces for php code and tabs for html.
And the point of doing that is?
--
Greg Donald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
1 - By using spaces on php code, I assure that I (or others) can edit
the script in any editor easily
2 - I use tabs(or no tabs at all) for html because size of output sent
to browser is smaller this way.
Greg Donald wrote:
On Thursday 15 April 2004 12:21 pm, Jorge Oliveira wrote:
I use
[snip]
1 - By using spaces on php code, I assure that I (or others) can edit
the script in any editor easily
2 - I use tabs(or no tabs at all) for html because size of output sent
to browser is smaller this way.
[/snip]
That is not correct. Since PHP and HTML engines all ignore white space
and
Jorge Oliveira mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, April 15, 2004 10:32 AM said:
- for html is better using tabs because by using spaces, it will
increase output to the browser;
only if you use more than one space per indent.
chris.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
PHP is one thing and HTML is another thing.. Check the google source code
and you'll that this is how they have it... I assume the reason is to reduce
the size of the page...
---
That is not correct. Since PHP and HTML engines all ignore white space
and comments it does not
[snip]
PHP is one thing and HTML is another thing.. Check the google source
code
and you'll that this is how they have it... I assume the reason is to
reduce
the size of the page...
[snip]
Your assumption about Google would be incorrect, it has nothing to do
with page size as most of their pages
On Thursday 15 April 2004 12:57 pm, Curt Zirzow wrote:
ok, then: s/[\r\n\t]//m;
either way, you're blindly removing white space, which *does* matter
in certain cases.
What case would that be? The function I posted is completely safe. I've been
using it for a long time without any issues.
What I meant was that it is obiously that eliminating the spaces but not by
a blind replacement, the new lines characters and even the tabs will reduce
the size of the page which will result in a faster loading and less
bandwidth consumed... And the example was google... Am I wrong with anything
You are correct, but I believe the bandwidth savings is small.
What I usually do for my apps is allow the admin to configure whitespace
trimming. If configured, I only remove whitespace from the beginning of the
line to the first non-whitespace character. This reduces the code size
somewhat,
From: Chris Boget [EMAIL PROTECTED]
function cleanFinalOutput($html){
$return = eregi_replace(\n, , $html);
$return = eregi_replace(\r, , $return);
return eregi_replace(\t, , $return);
}
Not to be too pedantic, but you could probably reduce the above
to a single line function:
You are correct, but I believe the bandwidth savings is small.
What I usually do for my apps is allow the admin to configure whitespace
trimming. If configured, I only remove whitespace from the beginning of
the
line to the first non-whitespace character. This reduces the code size
On Thursday 15 April 2004 01:49 pm, Richard Davey wrote:
The browser doesn't give a
monkeys about whitespace et all. Having said that, stripping it vs.
leaving it is virtually irrelevant too and I'm shocked why so many
skilled people on this list actually care-less about it :) There is no
On Thursday 15 April 2004 01:38 pm, John W. Holmes wrote:
Certainly don't need to fire up the regex engine.
return str_replace(array(\r,\n,\t),'',$html);
Sweet, didn't know you pass it an array. Thx!
--
Greg Donald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
* Thus wrote Greg Donald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thursday 15 April 2004 12:57 pm, Curt Zirzow wrote:
ok, then: s/[\r\n\t]//m;
either way, you're blindly removing white space, which *does* matter
in certain cases.
What case would that be? The function I posted is completely safe. I've
* Thus wrote Arthur Radulescu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
PHP is one thing and HTML is another thing.. Check the google source code
and you'll that this is how they have it... I assume the reason is to reduce
the size of the page...
I very much doubt that, if they were so concerned about WS then
they
* Thus wrote John W. Holmes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
From: Chris Boget [EMAIL PROTECTED]
function cleanFinalOutput($html){
$return = eregi_replace(\n, , $html);
$return = eregi_replace(\r, , $return);
return eregi_replace(\t, , $return);
}
Not to be too pedantic, but you
Richard Davey wrote:
Passing a potentially huge string through a replacement function for
every single page doesn't really = efficient in my shop. YMMV.
We use Turke MMCache so it's not every single page.
Besides that CPUs are way cheaper than bandwidth.
--
Greg Donald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP
Hi, I have found the solution to my problem, I share it
http://phpeditors.linuxbackup.co.uk/
Greetings and thanks,
Nico
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jay Blanchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: donderdag 2 oktober 2003 14:30
Aan: Nico Berg; PHP General
Onderwerp: RE: [PHP
Nico Berg mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Friday, October 03, 2003 12:38 AM said:
Hi, I have found the solution to my problem, I share it
http://phpeditors.linuxbackup.co.uk/
OOH! OOH! OOH! This should be added to the weekly PHP Newbie post!!!
chris.
--
PHP General Mailing List
[snip]
I am pretty new in PHP coding. So for starters i want to know what is a
good
php-editor?
I like them freeware for windows.
[/snip]
EDIT for windows is great, it's free, it's already installed and it
requires that you do no additional searching of manuals, archives, or
the web to use.
[snip]
I have the Dutch translation of the php-bible and they write:
Use the right tool, don't let anybody tell you you need notepad or tools
like that, use a proper tool.
Are they dumm? Is it better to use a tool like emacs, notepad, edit or
someting like that?
The advice Visual Slickedit but
Nico Berg mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, October 02, 2003 5:09 AM said:
I am pretty new in PHP coding. So for starters i want to know what is
a good php-editor?
I like them freeware for windows.
HTML-Kit www.chami.com
c.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
I write my code with pencil and paper and then scan it..
Dont need an editor !
John Nichel wrote:
I know we've discussed this numerous times, but I'll chime in again
(mainly because I'm bored).
By far, I have been totally satisfied with UltraEdit. Lightweight, just
about any language you
I like accelerators I just didnt like the price. So I wrote my own, but I
havent worked all the bugs out yet.
From: Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Curt Zirzow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: PHP-General [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
Date: 24 Sep 2003 09:44:40
-General [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:34:33 -0400
FYI- New to this list but have been a php coder for 2 years.
I know a lot of you out there are going to groan inwardly, but I use
Dreamweaver, mainly because that's what I used since it's
in
the HTML or php. But again thats just me.
From: Kevin Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cesar Cordovez [EMAIL PROTECTED], PHP-General
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:04:45 -0400
Thanks:) I'll give BBedit a go for a week and let you know how
lmao .. good one.
From: pete M [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:59:19 +0100
I write my code with pencil and paper and then scan it..
Dont need an editor !
John Nichel wrote:
I know we've discussed this numerous
:12 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
I bet you don't indent your code either. And all white characters are
useless too, they only slow interpreter down. Good coder will understand
this at a glimpse:
if($pos_params!=false){$back_url=substr($HTTP_GET_VARS['origin'],0,$pos_para
ms
you can create so-called assistants...
You can create a loop that asks in a table how many rows and
columns do you
want in that table.
Then you can have it create the table with all your favorite
default table
settings, but while it is generating it, you could have it
prompt you for
Jim Lucas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:52 AM said:
I already answered that question two days ago.
I didn't ask you to answer it twice so I don't what you're talking
about.
c,
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
if you will..
Jim Lucas
- Original Message -
From: Roger B.A. Klorese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jim Lucas' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Chris W. Parker'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'jeffrey pearson' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:00 PM
Subject: RE: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor
Sorry, someone else responded to your email with the request.
Jim Lucas
- Original Message -
From: Chris W. Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jim Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED]; jeffrey pearson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:01 PM
Subject: RE: RE: [PHP
I guess you could call them helper scripts libraries.
Example would be: You can program a script to create a switch
statement and
then have it prompt you for the number of case statements to
add in and if
you want them to break; or not.
Things like that. Short cuts if you will..
AEdiX
- Original Message -
From: jeffrey pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
I like to use Edit Plus. www.editplus.com
It has the syntax highlighting for php, perl, java
It doesn't do syntax highlighting, but if you need
that, then you need to learn to code better.
Ha,ha. too funny.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Lucas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:56 AM
To: jeffrey pearson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: [PHP] PHP
priced copy does.
Plus, one added feature is, is that it will allow you to do internal
scripting.
Jim Lucas
- Original Message -
From: jeffrey pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
I
into the production environment. But really unless you are dealing with
hight traffic sites, your not going to see a difference.
From: Marek Kilimajer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jim Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:12:04
: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
I like to use Edit Plus. www.editplus.com
It has the syntax highlighting for php, perl, java, and many others
through modules that are downloadable from their web site, DOESNT change
code like
* Thus wrote Didier McGillis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
alot easier for me with the returns and tabs. What I do is I have a script
that strips out any space, tabs, carriage returns and then moves the code
into the production environment. But really unless you are dealing with
In some cases,
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 09:43, Curt Zirzow wrote:
* Thus wrote Didier McGillis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
alot easier for me with the returns and tabs. What I do is I have a script
that strips out any space, tabs, carriage returns and then moves the code
into the production environment. But
* Thus wrote Robert Cummings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
*COUGH* *COUGH* EVERY REAL coder knows that you have to use the
following brace style for your code to be accepted into the l33t
hierarchy of [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
if( $pos_params != false )
{
$back_url = substr( $HTTP_GET_VARS['origin'],
Hi,
Good coder will understand this at a glimpse:
[snip horrible code]
if($pos_params!=false)
Assuming it's a boolean, $pos_params is *already* true or false, so testing
it like this is pretty much pointless. It makes more sense (and is much more
readable IMHO) to do something like this:
if
Curt Zirzow wrote:
cat | realprogrammer | in_a_rush
if($p) {
$bu = substr( $_GET['o'], 0, $p );
$bup = substr( $_GET['o'], ++$p );
} else {
$bu = $_GET['o'];
$bup = '';
}
This is a real world example of how real programmer in a rush can
introduce bugs. Original example did not modify $p
* Thus wrote Jon Haworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi,
Good coder will understand this at a glimpse:
[snip horrible code]
if($pos_params!=false)
um... you rewrote that, his code was:
if( $pos_params != false )
Assuming it's a boolean, $pos_params is *already* true or false, so
Jon Haworth wrote:
if($pos_params!=false)
Assuming it's a boolean, $pos_params is *already* true or false, so testing
it like this is pretty much pointless. It makes more sense (and is much more
readable IMHO) to do something like this:
if ($pos_params) {
// something
}
From the futher reading
FYI- New to this list but have been a php coder for 2 years.
I know a lot of you out there are going to groan inwardly, but I use
Dreamweaver, mainly because that's what I used since it's inception when I
was writing static sites. I use OSX for my writing platform and occasionally
use BBedit as
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:34:33 -0400
Kevin Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI- New to this list but have been a php coder for 2 years.
I know a lot of you out there are going to groan inwardly, but I use
Dreamweaver, mainly because that's what I used since it's inception when I
was writing
THE best text/code editor in this planet is BBEdit. No questions about
it. It is a pitty it only runs on Macs. I have used it to write text,
code fortran, pascal, c, c++, html, css and php (among others). It is
great, I love it. Kudos to Bare Bones! Great find/replace utility.
Incredible
Thanks:) I'll give BBedit a go for a week and let you know how it turns out.
Yes, Dreamweaver does sucketh much, but it's great for hashing out the page
(WYSIWYG style) then tweeking the code. I Hate (capital H) hand typing
nested tables.* :P
*high school memoryHwat the hell do I need typing
The new Dreamweaver is much better than the previous version.
I still have not found 'the ideal' editor for me and I use several
tools. The one tool that looks like it could become my tool of choice
could be eclipse. because you can build custom editors (plugins) for
anything you need.
Clint
I know we've discussed this numerous times, but I'll chime in again
(mainly because I'm bored).
By far, I have been totally satisfied with UltraEdit. Lightweight, just
about any language you want to edit, user configurable syntax
highlighting (for those into that), handles UNIX / DOS / Mac
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:04:45PM -0400, Kevin Bruce wrote:
:
: Thanks:) I'll give BBedit a go for a week and let you know how it turns out.
: Yes, Dreamweaver does sucketh much, but it's great for hashing out the page
: (WYSIWYG style) then tweeking the code. I Hate (capital H) hand typing
:
The Best is the GTK verstion of the classic VI editor (latest VI 6.2 -
uses GTK 2 on Linux) and there is also a Windows version.
It's the best and you don't have to pay for licenses.
http://www.vim.org/index.php
Notepad - is very poor. you can not controle tabs spaces, see white
space and
In you php.ini, set error_append_string to ... you loser!
On Monday 22 September 2003 07:56 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You must either be insane, a genius, or joking.
Some of the most gifted people in the world are all three! Not that I'm
claiming to be one, but yes I'm all three. :-D
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, September 22, 2003 2:00 am
Subject: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
well, i like to use dreamweaver mx or textpad with the syntax highlighting
file you additionally have to download. i dunno if there are special php-
must-have-editors.
grtz
jan
scripting.
Jim Lucas
- Original Message -
From: jeffrey pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
I like to use Edit Plus. www.editplus.com
It has the syntax highlighting for php, perl
Jim Lucas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:56 AM said:
Plus, one added feature is, is that it will allow you to do internal
scripting.
What are you able to do with internal scripting?
chris.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe,
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 00:56, Jim Lucas wrote:
I like NoteTab from www.notetab.com
It doesn't do syntax highlighting, but if you need that, then you need to
learn to code better.
Does that mean php shouldn't have any error reporting whatsoever, because it
encourages bad incompetent
[snip]
It doesn't do syntax highlighting, but if you need that, then you need
to
learn to code better.
Does that mean php shouldn't have any error reporting whatsoever,
because it
encourages bad incompetent coders who rely on being mollycoddled?
[/snip]
Mollycoddled indeed! I remember when I
It doesn't do syntax highlighting, but if you need that, then you need to
learn to code better.
O holy genius coder, we bow to you, forgive uswhy did we take the
straight and easy path instead of the rough and true path...
-Ryan
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
Ryan A mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:10 AM said:
O holy genius coder, we bow to you, forgive uswhy did we take the
straight and easy path instead of the rough and true path...
Because we are not ereet.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
* Thus wrote Chris W. Parker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Ryan A mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:10 AM said:
O holy genius coder, we bow to you, forgive uswhy did we take the
straight and easy path instead of the rough and true path...
Because we are not
additional settings that you would like to have in the new table.
Jim Lucas
- Original Message -
From: Chris W. Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jim Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED]; jeffrey pearson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:06 AM
Subject: RE: RE: [PHP] PHP
23, 2003 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 00:56, Jim Lucas wrote:
I like NoteTab from www.notetab.com
It doesn't do syntax highlighting, but if you need that, then you need
to
learn to code better.
Does that mean php shouldn't have
well, i like to use dreamweaver mx or textpad with the syntax highlighting file you
additionally have to download. i dunno if there are special php-must-have-editors.
grtz
jan
-Original Message-
From: Binay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Montag, 22. September 2003 10:58
To: [EMAIL
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:00 AM
Subject: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
well, i like to use dreamweaver mx or textpad with the syntax highlighting
file you additionally have to download. i dunno if there are special
php-must-have-editors.
grtz
jan
for a professional use.
Cordialement,
Jean-Philippe BENARD
Consultant STERIA Infogérance
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-Message d'origine-
De : Ruessel, Jan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 22 septembre 2003 11:00
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
well, i like to use
On Monday 22 Sep 2003 11:35, BENARD Jean-philippe wrote:
Not a php-must-have-editors but useful ones, for example, are phpEd
and Zend Studio (text completion, functions library, ...). I found that
Zend Studio is a good one because of internal CVS connexions, work on
UNIX Windows systems,
www.becomingdigital.com
wishes | www.amazon.com/o/registry/EGDXEBBWTYUU
- Original Message -
From: Ryan A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 22 September, 2003 05:07
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
Hey
Personally I dont think any 1 is good for all purposes...I use
works for you.
Edward Dudlik
Becoming Digital
www.becomingdigital.com
wishes | www.amazon.com/o/registry/EGDXEBBWTYUU
- Original Message -
From: Ryan A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 22 September, 2003 05:07
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?
Hey
Binay mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, September 22, 2003 1:58 AM said:
Please suggest me a good PHP editor like ( Microsoft's Interdev for
ASP) to write my php programs/scripts and get a visual feel.
Doesn't fit in the visual feel category but I really like HTML-Kit
available at
PHP eclipse is also nice, you need eclipse from http://www.eclipse.org
and then you install the PHP Eclipse module
http://phpeclipse.sourceforge.net. Very easy to install, I am a big fan
of Komodo, I also like Vim, Kate and Eclipse. I tried Zend Studio 1 and
2 but it didn't live up to
Best PHP Editor on the market: called Notepad. Written by a tiny little
software dev company called Microsoft. Very nicely written, compared to the rest
of their software.
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 22:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Best PHP Editor on the market: called Notepad. Written by a tiny little
software dev company called Microsoft. Very nicely written, compared to the rest
of their software.
Nh, a slightly larger company named Microsoft Inc. created an
Best PHP Editor on the market: called Notepad. Written by a tiny little
software dev company called Microsoft. Very nicely written, compared to the rest
of their software.
You must either be insane, a genius, or joking. I couldn't imagine
writing code without context sensitive highlighting
You must either be insane, a genius, or joking.
Some of the most gifted people in the world are all three! Not that I'm
claiming to be one, but yes I'm all three. :-D
I couldn't imagine writing code without context sensitive highlighting --
there are so many bugs that would be overlooked. -
I think the BEST php editor out there is Microsoft's Visual Studio.
Here's some of the reasons I think Visual Studio is the BEST
1. None of that annoying syntax highlighting that you find in many other
editors
2. Unlimited technical support (at only $245 per call)
3. At $1000 - $2500 per copy
*ROFL*
Rob.
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 12:54, Chris Hubbard wrote:
I think the BEST php editor out there is Microsoft's Visual Studio.
Here's some of the reasons I think Visual Studio is the BEST
1. None of that annoying syntax highlighting that you find in many other
editors
2. Unlimited
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:54:06 -0800
Chris Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the BEST php editor out there is Microsoft's Visual Studio.
You should've posted this before I got all invested with Nedit, Linux and the
like...
Here's some of the reasons I think Visual Studio is the BEST
1.
Thanks for starting my day out with a chuckle.. this is one of the better
tongue in cheek items I have seen in a little bit
Chris
I think the BEST php editor out there is Microsoft's Visual Studio.
Here's some of the reasons I think Visual Studio is the BEST
1. None of that annoying syntax
Dreamweaver MX 2004.
-
zerof
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
STONE Steven wrote:
What's the best php editor out there?
Thanks in advance for nay replies!
We've reached our quota on answering this question. Search the archives.
--
---John Holmes...
Amazon Wishlist: www.amazon.com/o/registry/3BEXC84AB3A5E/
php|architect: The Magazine for PHP
Hello STONE,
I use Zend Studio
SS What's the best php editor out there?
SS Thanks in advance for nay replies!
--
Best regards,
MuToGeNmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
This list is not owned by Zend. One should still not be talking about
cracking software (Zend or otherwise) on it, though...
Zeev
At 14:51 14/06/2003, Ryan A wrote:
What can i say?
if you aint living on the edge you're taking up too much space
I reccomend you don't talk about cracking
A
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: [PHP] php editor?
This list is not owned by Zend. One should still not be talking about
cracking software (Zend or otherwise) on it, though...
Zeev
At 14:51 14/06/2003, Ryan A wrote:
What can i say?
if you aint living on the edge you're taking up too
PHPCoder Pro is a very nice development enviroment as well
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:22 PM
Subject: Fw: [PHP] php editor?
Try to these PHP development environment:
* Nusphere Studio
* Zend Studio
* Maguma
101 - 200 of 265 matches
Mail list logo
