On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:51:55 +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
I read somewhere that the XHTML standards say that for all attributes
that would normally be standalone in HTML, they should be given a value
that is the same as the attribute name, so you would use
multiple=multiple,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:59:36 -0400, tedd wrote:
As I understand it and is my experience, that is
true -- a stand-alone HTML attribute should be
equal to itself, such as selected=selected, or
In HTML (as opposed to XHTML), there are a bunch of
shortcut features[1] that allow you to write
On 17 June 2009 22:05, Nisse Engström advised:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:18:09 +0100, Ford, Mike wrote:
This is very true -- but XHTML requires *all* attributes to have a
value, so an XHTML conformant page will use select multiple=multiple
name=selector (or something similar such as select
On 17 June 2009 23:56, PJ advised:
Nisse Engström wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:18:09 +0100, Ford, Mike wrote:
This is very true -- but XHTML requires *all* attributes to have a
value, so an XHTML conformant page will use select multiple=multiple
name=selector (or something similar such
Ford, Mike wrote:
On 17 June 2009 23:56, PJ advised:
Nisse Engstr�m wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:18:09 +0100, Ford, Mike wrote:
This is very true -- but XHTML requires *all* attributes to have a
value, so an XHTML conformant page will use select multiple=multiple
At 8:47 PM -0400 6/17/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
tedd wrote:
As I understand it and is my experience, that is true -- a
stand-alone HTML attribute should be equal to itself, such as
selected=selected, or more specifically selected=SELECTED.
How is that MORE specific? XHTML is like a
tedd wrote:
At 8:47 PM -0400 6/17/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
tedd wrote:
As I understand it and is my experience, that is true -- a
stand-alone HTML attribute should be equal to itself, such as
selected=selected, or more specifically selected=SELECTED.
How is that MORE specific? XHTML is like
On 17 June 2009 02:11, Shawn McKenzie advised:
PJ wrote:
I'm sorry, guys, but I am really getting po'd.
The irresponsible sloppiness and stupidity is just getting to me.
In my quest for a way to populate a multiple option select box I have
run across so many errors that it's beyond belief...
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:18:09 +0100, Ford, Mike wrote:
This is very true -- but XHTML requires *all* attributes to have a
value, so an XHTML conformant page will use select multiple=multiple
name=selector (or something similar such as select multiple=yes
name=selector). The only inconsistency
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 23:05 +0200, Nisse Engström wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:18:09 +0100, Ford, Mike wrote:
This is very true -- but XHTML requires *all* attributes to have a
value, so an XHTML conformant page will use select multiple=multiple
name=selector (or something similar such
Nisse Engström wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:18:09 +0100, Ford, Mike wrote:
This is very true -- but XHTML requires *all* attributes to have a
value, so an XHTML conformant page will use select multiple=multiple
name=selector (or something similar such as select multiple=yes
At 10:51 PM +0100 6/17/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 23:05 +0200, Nisse Engström wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:18:09 +0100, Ford, Mike wrote:
This is very true -- but XHTML requires *all* attributes to have a
value, so an XHTML conformant page will use select
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 18:59 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 10:51 PM +0100 6/17/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 23:05 +0200, Nisse Engström wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:18:09 +0100, Ford, Mike wrote:
This is very true -- but XHTML requires *all* attributes to have a
value,
I don't know what validator you're using, but according to
http://validator.w3.org/ (as official as it gets) the following
fragment is correct in HTML 4.01, HTML 5, XHTML 1.0 Strict, and XHTML
1.1:
select
option selected=selectedtest/option
/select
Thus sayeth the W3C, so let it be written, so
Ford, Mike wrote:
On 17 June 2009 02:11, Shawn McKenzie advised:
PJ wrote:
I'm sorry, guys, but I am really getting po'd.
The irresponsible sloppiness and stupidity is just getting to me.
In my quest for a way to populate a multiple option select box I have
run across so many errors that it's
tedd wrote:
At 10:51 PM +0100 6/17/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 23:05 +0200, Nisse Engström wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:18:09 +0100, Ford, Mike wrote:
This is very true -- but XHTML requires *all* attributes to have a
value, so an XHTML conformant page will use
Robert Cummings wrote:
Ash:
As I understand it and is my experience, that is true -- a stand-alone
HTML attribute should be equal to itself, such as selected=selected,
or more specifically selected=SELECTED.
How is that MORE specific? XHTML is like a cross-section of XML and
HTML. It is
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Ash:
As I understand it and is my experience, that is true -- a
stand-alone HTML attribute should be equal to itself, such as
selected=selected, or more specifically selected=SELECTED.
How is that MORE specific? XHTML is like a
-Original Message-
From: Shawn McKenzie [mailto:nos...@mckenzies.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 9:11 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Re: sloppiness stupidity
PJ wrote:
I'm sorry, guys, but I am really getting po'd.
The irresponsible sloppiness and
19 matches
Mail list logo
