On Nov 30, 2009, at 11:41 AM, Bob McConnell wrote:
From: Rahul S. Johari
On Nov 30, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Bob McConnell wrote:
From: news
even though the dbf has 10K records
Fox can't spend "minutes" to found a match
by the way, its very strange
to have 35 columns in a table/dbf or whatever.
On Nov 30, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Bob McConnell wrote:
From: news
even though the dbf has 10K records
Fox can't spend "minutes" to found a match
by the way, its very strange
to have 35 columns in a table/dbf or whatever
pay attention to the comment of Ashley
in Fox, you should:
SELECT direc
of course, i agree
xbase needed indexes to work properly
Bob McConnell escribió:
From: news
even though the dbf has 10K records
Fox can't spend "minutes" to found a match
by the way, its very strange
to have 35 columns in a table/dbf or whatever
pay attention to the comment of Ashley
From: news
> even though the dbf has 10K records
> Fox can't spend "minutes" to found a match
> by the way, its very strange
> to have 35 columns in a table/dbf or whatever
>
> pay attention to the comment of Ashley
> in Fox, you should:
>
> SELECT directory
> INDEX on phone_number to idx_di
Back in 1996 FoxPro was multi-platform. The last FoxPro version
released for Mac was Visual FoxPro 3.0b (1996). After that Microsoft
bought FoxPro and Mac Support/Development was cut off. As of now,
there are NO known ODBC Drivers for FoxPro for the Mac Platform.
So that aside ... back to O
uhh, i don't know
(time ago Fox was multi-platform unix/mac/dos)
did you found that on the web?
Rahul S. Johari escribió:
Keyser,
It gets better -- I'm on a Mac OS X (Leopard)!! As far as I know, there
isn't a VisualFoxPro ODBC Driver for Mac OS X.
On Nov 24, 2009, at 10:11 AM, keyser s
Keyser,
It gets better -- I'm on a Mac OS X (Leopard)!! As far as I know,
there isn't a VisualFoxPro ODBC Driver for Mac OS X.
On Nov 24, 2009, at 10:11 AM, keyser soze wrote:
Rahul, my friend
i found this in a first search
perhaps it be helpful
http://www.yinfor.com/blog/archives/2008/0
I do believe that what I'm doing is scanning the foxpro dbase row by
row to get the match ... which is why it's returning the results very
slow.
But I don't know if there's any other way to do this. Basically the
FoxPro DBF has 75,000 records and I have to search for the one row
which has
Rahul, my friend
i found this in a first search
perhaps it be helpful
http://www.yinfor.com/blog/archives/2008/01/php_connect_dbf_file.html
Rahul S. Johari escribió:
I do believe that what I'm doing is scanning the foxpro dbase row by row
to get the match ... which is why it's returning the r
i will try to help you
but think i'm old in Fox but new in php
and sadly never used php+fox
so, reading your code
i see you are scanning the whole dbf file from php
Fox cant help you in this way
if there is not another option for scan a dbf
the row by row method is very slow
Rahul S. Johari
Your post definitely gives me hope. It's possible I'm doing something
wrong!
I definitely have the foxpro database indexed. I use this FoxPro
command ...
INDEX ON PHONE TAG PHONE
I do have a .CDX file present for the Database and if I MODIFY
STRUCTURE and I can see the INDEX present on PHO
even though the dbf has 10K records
Fox can't spend "minutes" to found a match
by the way, its very strange
to have 35 columns in a table/dbf or whatever
pay attention to the comment of Ashley
in Fox, you should:
SELECT directory
INDEX on phone_number to idx_directory_phone
- or -
INDEX on p
12 matches
Mail list logo