Can't you say that about anything?
"Scott Fletcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I don't use cookies either due to the fact that some web browser block the
> cookies and some web browser's bug that affected the cookie. For example,
> if Inte
> If you want 100% accessability, forget cookies were ever invented :)
> While you're erasing stuff from your brain, throw out javascript too :D
Some people don't have a fast access to internet. Very simple javascript to
validate a form before submitting it can be IMHO still useful. But I agree
t
on 19/07/02 3:47 AM, Alberto Serra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> We use but one cookie, for returning user recognition. That is, the sort
> of info your soft can survive without. As for passing values on the GET
> channel to iframes, we do it all the time and have never seen a single
> problem.
P
ðÒÉ×ÅÔ!
Analysis & Solutions wrote:
> What increased cost? If someone does the right thing in the first place,
> there's no cost. The developers are either gettting paid to develop
> something that works right in the first place or they're getting paid to
> develop something that doesn't.
LOL
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 08:47:45PM +0300, Alberto Serra wrote:
>
> It's a customer's choice, obviously. Most customers do not give a damn
> about minorities (and so do not want to increase budgets to develop an
> alternate solution that will address a minor community).
What increased cost? If
ðÒÉ×ÅÔ!
PHPCoder wrote:
> application useless unless I code a "plan B" into my code; meaning I can
> just as well NOT use cookies from the start...
> "catch 22 dejavu..."
> What are the general feeling out there amongst developers about the use
> of cookies?
--snip--
> I gather that
> the "alt
on 18/07/02 11:38 PM, PHPCoder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What are the general feeling out there amongst developers about the use
> of cookies?
If you want to assure that you maintain session across the whole site,
appealing to the lowest common denominator, then hard code the SID to all
relat
I don't use cookies either due to the fact that some web browser block the
cookies and some web browser's bug that affected the cookie. For example,
if Internet Explorer have a bug with the cookie then it is gurantee that
you'll never find MS to have this bug fix in a few days. It could take 6
m
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 03:38:51PM +0200, PHPCoder wrote:
> What are the general feeling out there amongst developers about the use
> of cookies?
Cookies rely on client side. I never rely on the client for anything.
When it comes to examples of how to do things "The Right Way," I say go
take
I'm really battling with this whole session thing.
My first impressions are that cookies are OK, and really helps to make
sessions workable and efficient, YET, from a developers point of view, I
always play devils advocate, and I'm wondering about those stubbourne
individuals out there who outr
10 matches
Mail list logo
