On 7/14/07, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You must have missed this:
http://php.net/~derick/meeting-notes.html#remove-support-for-and-script-language-php-and-add-php-var
Actually, yes, I did. I'll have to read through some of that stuff.
Thanks for the link!
Also note that,
On Thu, July 12, 2007 6:42 pm, Micky Hulse wrote:
I am trying to describe why php short tags failed to work on a
server...
here is my simplified explanation:
it had to do with the server settings... The short_open_tag directive
in php.ini was set to 0.
Do you think that is an ok way to
Hey Richard, thanks for the reply. I appreciate it. :)
Richard Lynch wrote:
http://php.net/
Yikes! I guess it was one of those RTFM question/answers! Lol. :D
#2 sounds awfully bogus to me...
Yeah... Hmm, now I am starting to wonder where I heard/read that. Maybe
it was a co-worker. I am
On 7/13/07, Micky Hulse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Richard, thanks for the reply. I appreciate it. :)
Richard Lynch wrote:
http://php.net/
Yikes! I guess it was one of those RTFM question/answers! Lol. :D
#2 sounds awfully bogus to me...
Yeah... Hmm, now I am starting to wonder where I
On Fri, July 13, 2007 8:54 am, Daniel Brown wrote:
To my knowledge (and even a quick peek at
http://www.php.net/ini.core), there is no indication that
short_open_tags is deprecated, nor that it's been on the verge of
removal at any point. I don't want to start a flame war, but it
sounds
Hi,
I am trying to describe why php short tags failed to work on a server...
here is my simplified explanation:
it had to do with the server settings... The short_open_tag directive
in php.ini was set to 0.
Do you think that is an ok way to describe the problem to a technically
literate
it had to do with the server settings... The short_open_tag directive
in php.ini was set to 0.
Do you think that is an ok way to describe the problem to a technically
literate non php coder?
Sure.
Additionally, is there a good reference on the net that explains the
differences between
Micky Hulse wrote:
Hi Chris, thanks for the quick reply. I appreciate your help.
Chris wrote:
Sure.
Thanks. :)
1 3 definitely. No idea how it's a security risk.
Ah, great. Thanks for clarification.
I probably mis-read the info about it being a security risk.
I should have said I'm
Hi Chris, thanks for the quick reply. I appreciate your help.
Chris wrote:
Sure.
Thanks. :)
1 3 definitely. No idea how it's a security risk.
Ah, great. Thanks for clarification.
I probably mis-read the info about it being a security risk.
Have a great day,
Cheers,
Micky
--
Wishlists:
9 matches
Mail list logo
