Jason,
ad infinitum, ad nauseum
However it was your recent post that (sig file) quoted the Freudian:
ontogency recapitulates phylogeny
We should make them become more like us
- even if we kill them in the process!
=dn
On Sunday 24 November 2002 22:58, DL Neil wrote:
Neatly done Ernest!
I have always had the opinion that the more comments you put into php
scripts, the slower they will run because there is more data to be read...
Can someone tell me if there is any truth in this or whether commenting has
absolutely 'no' impact on the performance of a script?
Thanks,
Adam.
--
I have always had the opinion that the more comments you put into php
scripts, the slower they will run because there is more data to be read...
Can someone tell me if there is any truth in this or whether commenting has
absolutely 'no' impact on the performance of a script?
The comments are
Adam,
I have always had the opinion that the more comments you put into php
scripts, the slower they will run because there is more data to be read...
Can someone tell me if there is any truth in this or whether commenting
has
absolutely 'no' impact on the performance of a script?
An answer
At 09:42 24.11.2002, Adam said:
[snip]
I have always had the opinion that the more comments you put into php
scripts, the slower they will run because there is more data to be read...
Can someone tell me if there is any truth in this or whether commenting
At 12:58 24.11.2002, DL Neil said:
[snip]
Why don't you run a microtime testbench to time a commented and an
uncommented loop, settle your mind, and report back with REAL information!?
[snip]
Some time ago I've made
Hello,
Ernest E Vogelsinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As PHP is an interpreter it needs to scan every line and every token of
code as it runs it. Thus said, of course using comments takes more time to
execute than having no comments.
I have no profiling yet how much having comments or blank
Neatly done Ernest!
Also in showing how these questions are best answered with five minutes on
the PC, than a msg to the list...
At 12:58 24.11.2002, DL Neil said:
[snip]
Why don't you run a microtime testbench to time a commented and an
uncommented
Ernest,
Some time ago I've made myself a framework for such tests and have run it
against a commented loop. This test was run on a dual PIII/1000 Dell
server.
$hpr = _fwx_profile_start('Loop with end-of-line comment', true);
for ($i = 0; $i 100; ++$i) {
$a += 1;
At 09:42 24.11.2002, Adam said:
[snip]
I have always had the opinion that the more comments you put into php
scripts, the slower they will run because there is more data to be read...
Can someone tell me if there is any truth in this or whether
At 16:10 24.11.2002, DL Neil said:
[snip]
However, if the Loop without
comment results make sense to you - you're a better man than I, Gunga Din!
[snip]
I'd rather have my scripts crawl than having no comments in
I have always had the opinion that the more comments you put into php
scripts, the slower they will run because there is more data to be read...
Can someone tell me if there is any truth in this or whether commenting
has
absolutely 'no' impact on the performance of a script?
If the overhead
On Sunday 24 November 2002 22:58, DL Neil wrote:
Neatly done Ernest!
Also in showing how these questions are best answered with five minutes on
the PC, than a msg to the list...
... until someone else comes along and asks a similar question and you have to
show them again how it's best
13 matches
Mail list logo
