Re: [PHP] Re: idiot proofing

2009-06-26 Thread Manuel Lemos
Hello, on 06/24/2009 09:24 PM Shawn McKenzie said the following: >> What about placing the contents in different divs and showing hiding >> those divs on submit? Then using AJAX to update the server / database >> with the requested operation? >> > That's a good one, however I'm assuming you haven'

RE: [PHP] Re: idiot proofing

2009-06-25 Thread tedd
At 6:39 AM -0500 6/25/09, Jay Blanchard wrote: [snip] ...stuff... [/snip] I had to LOL at the subject line for the potential irony :) Me too, but for a different reason -- I fear it's too late. :-) Cheers, tedd -- --- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.c

RE: [PHP] Re: idiot proofing

2009-06-25 Thread Jay Blanchard
[snip] ...stuff... [/snip] I had to LOL at the subject line for the potential irony :) Typically we set applications to submit to central processing code for a number of reasons, maintainability being the highest among these. So you get... Form->Central Processing->Output Typically this

RE: [PHP] Re: idiot proofing

2009-06-24 Thread Asher Snyder
ppropriate markup and js. -Original Message- From: Michael A. Peters [mailto:mpet...@mac.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 10:36 PM To: Bastien Koert Cc: Shawn McKenzie; php-general@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: idiot proofing Bastien Koert wrote: >>> >> T

RE: [PHP] Re: idiot proofing

2009-06-24 Thread Asher Snyder
---Original Message- From: Michael A. Peters [mailto:mpet...@mac.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 10:36 PM To: Bastien Koert Cc: Shawn McKenzie; php-general@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: idiot proofing Bastien Koert wrote: >>> >> That's a good one, however I'

Re: [PHP] Re: idiot proofing

2009-06-24 Thread Michael A. Peters
Bastien Koert wrote: That's a good one, however I'm assuming you haven't been following PJ's posts :-) Once he tries AJAX, I feel for the js.general and ajax.general folks! Well, I have followed PJ's posts and agree that this [AJAX] is something that he's not ready for yet. Not to mentio

Re: [PHP] Re: idiot proofing

2009-06-24 Thread Bastien Koert
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: > Bastien Koert wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: >>> PJ wrote: I have a bit of a situation. I have set up addBooks, editBooks and deleteBooks pages. Before complicating my life & mixing them up in

Re: [PHP] Re: idiot proofing

2009-06-24 Thread Shawn McKenzie
Bastien Koert wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: >> PJ wrote: >>> I have a bit of a situation. >>> I have set up addBooks, editBooks and deleteBooks pages. Before >>> complicating my life & mixing them up in one file, I am running tests. >>> I'd like to make them idiot

Re: [PHP] Re: idiot proofing

2009-06-24 Thread Bastien Koert
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: > PJ wrote: >> I have a bit of a situation. >> I have set up addBooks, editBooks and deleteBooks pages. Before >> complicating my life & mixing them up in one file, I am running tests. >> I'd like to make them idiot proof, up to a point. >> Whe