[PHP] Connection pool extension?

2003-01-08 Thread Vinod Panicker
will reuse the existing connection Tx, Vinod. --- Vinod Panicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sr. Software Designer Geodesic Information Systems Ltd. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP] Connection pool extension?

2003-01-08 Thread Vinod Panicker
Hi, Thanks for the quick response - I am aware of PHP's support for sockets, but since I cant store persistent connection information in a PHP script I was looking out for a module Tx, Vinod. --- Vinod Panicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sr. Software Design

[PHP] Full-Duplex communication

2002-05-21 Thread Vinod Panicker
Hi, We have developed a client-server application where the server needs to send asynchronous data to the client. Now since we are using Apache/PHP/MySQL, the client needs to poll the server periodically for information. I was thinking if there was some way to get around this basic problem.

Re: Re: [PHP] Full-Duplex communication

2002-05-21 Thread Vinod Panicker
_after_ getting >connected. > >What are you using on the other end of the pipe (on the client)? >Plain HTML? Flash? Java? Something else? > >Bogdan > >Vinod Panicker wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>We have developed a client-server application where the server &g

Re: Re: [PHP] Full-Duplex communication

2002-05-21 Thread Vinod Panicker
>other way around (i.e. when the CLIENT wants to send data to the >server). > >Bogdan > >Vinod Panicker wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Tx for your very prompt reply. >> >>Yeah, I'll post the solution as soon as I find it someplace. >> >>L

Re: Re: Re: [PHP] Full-Duplex communication

2002-05-21 Thread Vinod Panicker
ave to implement at least a >subset >of the HTTP protocol in order to get browsers to talk to you. > >Unfortunately, since you can't - to the best of my knowledge - >fork a PHP >program, you're going to have to do your own homebrew threading >which will >make

Re: Re: Re: [PHP] Full-Duplex communication

2002-05-21 Thread Vinod Panicker
. Tx, Vinod. On Wed, 22 May 2002 Richard Archer wrote : >At 5:55 AM + 22/5/02, Vinod Panicker wrote: > > >I want the ability to write to a socket thats been created >earlier > >- i want to steal it from Apache, so that i can use it when >and > >where i like. &g

Re: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? Part 2

2002-05-21 Thread Vinod Panicker
Yes Jimmy, you are correct. MD5 is a one-way hash. Its used for getting a unique fingerprint of some data (like files / passwords etc) so that it can be compared with another MD5 hash. Thats the point of a hashing algorithm like MD5 and SHA1 - you should never need to decrypt the data. Refe

Re: [PHP] Full-Duplex communication

2002-05-22 Thread Vinod Panicker
for other problems. Tx, Vinod. On Wed, 22 May 2002 Richard Archer wrote : >At 7:01 AM + 22/5/02, Vinod Panicker wrote: > > >What i have at the other end is a Instant Messenger client :) > >Which is presumably accepting some form of HTML or at least a >stream of data sent o

Re: Re: [PHP] Full-Duplex communication

2002-05-22 Thread Vinod Panicker
2002, Miguel Cruz wrote: > > On 22 May 2002, Vinod Panicker wrote: > >> "Instant" is how the response should be. Thats why i'm >clamouring > >> for the socket so that i can send data directly to the >client, > >> from a C++ binary or mayb

Re: RE: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? part 3

2002-05-22 Thread Vinod Panicker
There is no use of hashing in file-encryption except to use it as a check - to see if the decrypted file matches the original file. To do this check, you can use either MD5 or SHA1. The choice is urs. If ur looking for a good encryption algorithm, you might want to consider AES (Rijndael).

Re: RE: RE: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? part 3

2002-05-22 Thread Vinod Panicker
nal Message- > From: Vinod Panicker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 22 May 2002 10:06 >To: Jimmy Lantz >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: RE: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? >part 3 > > >There is no use of hashing in file-encryption except to u

Re: RE: RE: RE: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? part 3

2002-05-22 Thread Vinod Panicker
s in ebc and text files in cbc? >JH >-Original Message----- > From: Vinod Panicker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 22 May 2002 10:25 >To: John Horton >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jimmy Lantz >Subject: Re: RE: RE: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no >fish? part >

Re: [PHP] Full-Duplex communication

2002-05-23 Thread Vinod Panicker
t;console ;) > >Hope that helps, and once again anyone PLEASE correct any >inaccuracies, since >I want to know. > > > > >On Tuesday 21 May 2002 23:53 pm, Vinod Panicker wrote: > > Thanks for the reply Miguel, but here i'm not trying to >implement > >

Re: Re: [PHP] Full-Duplex communication

2002-05-23 Thread Vinod Panicker
the color red because your old girlfriend used >to wear >it a lot. > >miguel > >On 23 May 2002, Vinod Panicker wrote: > > What you said did make sense, and complements my knowledge >of > > sockets. > > > > But what i'm not sure of is this - if i

RE: Re: [PHP] Full-Duplex communication

2002-05-27 Thread Vinod Panicker
iguel Cruz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:18 PM To: Vinod Panicker Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: [PHP] Full-Duplex communication So still there is nothing in your requirements that doesn't suggest you'll do fine with a PHP-based liste