Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-14 Thread Ashley Sheridan
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 15:47 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote: Daevid Vincent wrote: Just to clarify. Obfuscation is NOT a substitute for security. While I don't disagree with the when's here of GET vs POST, this statement is a bit misleading... Any cracker worth his salt can easily

Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-14 Thread Michael A. Peters
Ashley Sheridan wrote: On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 15:47 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote: I think doing it that way also has search engine indexing advantages. I've done a bit of research into that, and can't find any evidence to suggest that the so-called friendly URL's are actually of any

Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-14 Thread דניאל דנון
$_REQUEST is less secure because it also contains cookie data. If you manage just to set a cookie, with the name act and value logout, the user will infinitely log out - You get the point. On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Jason Pruim ja...@jasonpruim.com wrote: On Apr 12, 2009, at 1:48 PM,

Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-14 Thread Nick Cooper
$_REQUEST is not any less secure then $_POST/$_GET/$_COOKIE, they all contain raw user data. The way $_REQUEST is being used in this example is not less secure then using $_GET. It does open up an exploit but this is not because $_REQUEST is less secure. The same exploit exists with $_GET, I

Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-14 Thread Paul M Foster
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 07:58:24AM +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote: snip I've done a bit of research into that, and can't find any evidence to suggest that the so-called friendly URL's are actually of any benefit to search engines. Just put a question into Google, and more often than not, the

Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-14 Thread haliphax
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Paul M Foster pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 07:58:24AM +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote: snip I've done a bit of research into that, and can't find any evidence to suggest that the so-called friendly URL's are actually of any benefit to

RE: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-13 Thread Daevid Vincent
- From: Jason Pruim [mailto:ja...@jasonpruim.com] Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 12:57 PM Subject: Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST POST does not display anything in the browser, so as others have said it's perfect for login's since that info will never be visible to the user

Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-13 Thread Michael A. Peters
Daevid Vincent wrote: Just to clarify. Obfuscation is NOT a substitute for security. While I don't disagree with the when's here of GET vs POST, this statement is a bit misleading... Any cracker worth his salt can easily install any number of Firefox extensions or unix command line tools and

Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-13 Thread Tom Worster
On 4/12/09 10:23 AM, Ron Piggott ron@actsministries.org wrote: How do I know when to use $_GET verses $_POST? i use GET when i want the user to be able to email the link to someone, mention it on a blog or bookmark it and it will always yield the same page. i use POST if submitting the

Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-13 Thread Tom Worster
On 4/13/09 6:47 PM, Michael A. Peters mpet...@mac.com wrote: For me the biggest advantage of post is the URLs aren't ugly. For cases where get with a variable in the URL is useful (IE product=BluePhone) - I prefer to handle that via mod_rewrite. The requests get handled by generic.php and

[PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-12 Thread Ron Piggott
How do I know when to use $_GET verses $_POST? Is there a pre defined variable that does both? Ron

RE: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-12 Thread abdulazeez alugo
From: ron@actsministries.org To: php-general@lists.php.net Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:23:01 -0400 Subject: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST How do I know when to use $_GET verses $_POST? Is there a pre defined variable that does both? Ron Hi Ron, One thing you should know

Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-12 Thread Phpster
$_GET when the form uses get or parameters are passed via the querystring $_POST when the form method is post $_REQUEST does both Bastien Sent from my iPod On Apr 12, 2009, at 10:23, Ron Piggott ron@actsministries.org wrote: How do I know when to use $_GET verses $_POST? Is there

Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-12 Thread 9el
One thing you should know is that when you use $_GET, you'll be sending a little information about the particular page to the browser and therefore it would be displayed in the address bar so for example if you're using get on a login page, you'll be showing user id and passwrod in the address

Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-12 Thread Ron Piggott
Thanks. I got my script updated. Ron On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 22:33 +0600, 9el wrote: One thing you should know is that when you use $_GET, you'll be sending a little information about the particular page to the browser and therefore it would be

Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-12 Thread Phpster
There are no real security issues with the $_REQUEST object. What needs to be taken into consideration is that the order that the PHP engine gathers data from the system ( GPCS ) and the potential issues having cookies or session data named the same as the actual data you are trying to

Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-12 Thread Jason Pruim
On Apr 12, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Ron Piggott wrote: Thanks. I got my script updated. Ron There are a few other thing's that I didn't see mentioned... The best description of when to use what, is this.. Use POST when you are submitting a form for storing info, using GET when you are

Re: [PHP] $_GET verses $_POST

2009-04-12 Thread Michael A. Peters
Jason Pruim wrote: On Apr 12, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Ron Piggott wrote: Thanks. I got my script updated. Ron There are a few other thing's that I didn't see mentioned... The best description of when to use what, is this.. Use POST when you are submitting a form for storing info, using GET