Can't you say that about anything?
Scott Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I don't use cookies either due to the fact that some web browser block the
cookies and some web browser's bug that affected the cookie. For example,
if Internet
If you want 100% accessability, forget cookies were ever invented :)
While you're erasing stuff from your brain, throw out javascript too :D
Some people don't have a fast access to internet. Very simple javascript to
validate a form before submitting it can be IMHO still useful. But I agree
I'm really battling with this whole session thing.
My first impressions are that cookies are OK, and really helps to make
sessions workable and efficient, YET, from a developers point of view, I
always play devils advocate, and I'm wondering about those stubbourne
individuals out there who
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 03:38:51PM +0200, PHPCoder wrote:
What are the general feeling out there amongst developers about the use
of cookies?
Cookies rely on client side. I never rely on the client for anything.
When it comes to examples of how to do things The Right Way, I say go
take a
I don't use cookies either due to the fact that some web browser block the
cookies and some web browser's bug that affected the cookie. For example,
if Internet Explorer have a bug with the cookie then it is gurantee that
you'll never find MS to have this bug fix in a few days. It could take 6
on 18/07/02 11:38 PM, PHPCoder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What are the general feeling out there amongst developers about the use
of cookies?
If you want to assure that you maintain session across the whole site,
appealing to the lowest common denominator, then hard code the SID to all
ðÒÉ×ÅÔ!
PHPCoder wrote:
application useless unless I code a plan B into my code; meaning I can
just as well NOT use cookies from the start...
catch 22 dejavu...
What are the general feeling out there amongst developers about the use
of cookies?
--snip--
I gather that
the alternative
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 08:47:45PM +0300, Alberto Serra wrote:
It's a customer's choice, obviously. Most customers do not give a damn
about minorities (and so do not want to increase budgets to develop an
alternate solution that will address a minor community).
What increased cost? If
ðÒÉ×ÅÔ!
Analysis Solutions wrote:
What increased cost? If someone does the right thing in the first place,
there's no cost. The developers are either gettting paid to develop
something that works right in the first place or they're getting paid to
develop something that doesn't.
LOL, we
on 19/07/02 3:47 AM, Alberto Serra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
We use but one cookie, for returning user recognition. That is, the sort
of info your soft can survive without. As for passing values on the GET
channel to iframes, we do it all the time and have never seen a single
problem.
10 matches
Mail list logo
