Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

2013-08-22 Thread David Harkness
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote: > Actually I think ".." is quite error-prone, because it is hard to > distinguish from "." or "_" on the _first_ glance, which makes the get > quickly through the code. [1] > I surround all operators except member access ("." and "->") with

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

2013-08-22 Thread Sebastian Krebs
2013/8/22 David Harkness > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Curtis Maurand wrote: > >> Sebastian Krebs wrote: > > > Actually the problem is, that the dot "." is already in use. With > > > $foo.bar() you cannot tell, if you want to call the method "bar()" on >> the >> > object "$foo", or if you w

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

2013-08-21 Thread David Harkness
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Curtis Maurand wrote: > Sebastian Krebs wrote: > Actually the problem is, that the dot "." is already in use. With > $foo.bar() you cannot tell, if you want to call the method "bar()" on the > > object "$foo", or if you want to concatenate the value of "$foo" to

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

2013-08-21 Thread Curtis Maurand
Sebastian Krebs wrote: > 2013/8/21 Curtis Maurand > >> >> >> >> Sorry in advance for the top post. >> >> Use the right tool for >> the Job. I've use Java, C# and PHP. >> >> 1. I hate the >> Perl-like object calls in PHP. I'd rather use "." notation >> in C# and Java. It saves a lot of wear

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

2013-08-21 Thread Sebastian Krebs
2013/8/21 Curtis Maurand > > > > Sorry in advance for the top post. > > Use the right tool for > the Job. I've use Java, C# and PHP. > > 1. I hate the > Perl-like object calls in PHP. I'd rather use "." notation > in C# and Java. It saves a lot of wear and tear on my left pinky > finger. > A

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

2013-08-21 Thread Curtis Maurand
Sorry in advance for the top post. Use the right tool for the Job.  I've use Java, C# and PHP. 1.  I hate the Perl-like object calls in PHP.  I'd rather use "." notation in C# and Java.  It saves a lot of wear and tear on my left pinky finger. 2.  Java and C# are both typed languages.  Say wha

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

2013-08-21 Thread Stuart Dallas
On 21 Aug 2013, at 15:01, "georg chambert" wrote: > my I shake the subject a little; Ive been doing some PHP and found it "ok" to > work with > not so much fuss, but that was PHP4, what about PHP5 ? > Dont really checked the difference but made a short-scan and found that it > had be > screwed

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

2013-08-21 Thread Sebastian Krebs
2013/8/21 georg chambert > Hi, > > my I shake the subject a little; Ive been doing some PHP and found it "ok" > to work with > not so much fuss, but that was PHP4, what about PHP5 ? > Dont really checked the difference but made a short-scan and found that it > had be > screwed around with ? > > A

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

2013-08-21 Thread georg chambert
Hi, my I shake the subject a little; Ive been doing some PHP and found it "ok" to work with not so much fuss, but that was PHP4, what about PHP5 ? Dont really checked the difference but made a short-scan and found that it had be screwed around with ? Any think, should I change to 5 ? BR geo

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs Java reliability

2002-01-23 Thread Aaron
Geoff Caplan wrote: >Michael > >>>the "Why PHP" on zend.com is a great place to go for this sort of >>> >stuff... > >>Honestly, it doesn't seem all that professional a resource paper... >> > >I would tend to agree - not something you could show to a hard-headed >corporate purchasing committee wit

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs Java reliability

2002-01-22 Thread Geoff Caplan
Michael > > the "Why PHP" on zend.com is a great place to go for this sort of stuff... > > > Honestly, it doesn't seem all that professional a resource paper... I would tend to agree - not something you could show to a hard-headed corporate purchasing committee with any confidence. > > I believ