nohnWed Feb 14 18:02:14 2007 UTC
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq obtaining.xml
Log:
* fix #40399
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml?r1=1.21&r2=1.22&diff_format=u
Index: phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xm
sfoxSun Jul 31 15:05:13 2005 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq obtaining.xml
Log:
updating the ldap stuff
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml?r1=1.20&r2=1.21&ty=u
Index: phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xm
nlopess Sun Aug 15 08:42:40 2004 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq obtaining.xml
/phpdoc/en/install/windows building.xml index.xml
/phpdoc/en/language/oop5basic.xml
Log:
fix build
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml?r1
nlopess Mon May 10 14:23:47 2004 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq obtaining.xml
Log:
the browscap problem is fixed now
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml?r1=1.18&r2=1.19&ty=u
Index: phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/faq/ob
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Jakub Vrana wrote:
> Derick Rethans wrote:
> >> Removed anchor as it redirects user back
>
> > Please revert this until we have a final solution.
>
> I suspected this... I removed only the anchor, URL remained there.
perfect :)
Derick
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Mehdi Achour wrote:
> Derick Rethans wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Jakub Vrana wrote:
> >
> >
> >>vrana Mon Mar 1 08:39:21 2004 EDT
> >>
> >> Modified files:
> >>/phpdoc/en/faq obtaining.xml
> >> Log:
> >> Removed anchor as it redirects user back
> >> #
Derick Rethans wrote:
>> Removed anchor as it redirects user back
> Please revert this until we have a final solution.
I suspected this... I removed only the anchor, URL remained there.
Mehdi Achour wrote:
> The link is actually redirecting back to php.net.
> I'm sure Jakub removed the anchor
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Jakub Vrana wrote:
> vrana Mon Mar 1 08:39:21 2004 EDT
>
> Modified files:
> /phpdoc/en/faqobtaining.xml
> Log:
> Removed anchor as it redirects user back
> # to do: try to fix get_browser and return the link
Please revert this until we have a final so
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Jakub Vrana wrote:
vrana Mon Mar 1 08:39:21 2004 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq obtaining.xml
Log:
Removed anchor as it redirects user back
# to do: try to fix get_browser and return the link
Please revert this until we have a final
vrana Mon Mar 1 08:39:21 2004 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq obtaining.xml
Log:
Removed anchor as it redirects user back
# to do: try to fix get_browser and return the link
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml?r1=1.17&r2=1.18&ty=
nlopess Thu Feb 12 12:04:53 2004 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq obtaining.xml
/phpdoc/en/reference/snmp reference.xml
/phpdoc/entitiesglobal.ent
Log:
ucd-snmp is obsolete
UCD-SNMP and NET-SMP are the same
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/ph
Ok, its done and ready for commit. faqurl.ent is properly merged with
global.ent, no leading faqurl anymore.
The en/faq is updated properly and also ready to commit, the build system gets
rid off faqurl.ent (manual.xml.in installpart.xml modofied)
BUT, following (partly) translations exists:
ph
> > Commemts?
>
> I don't see a reason to have any faq only urls. Why
> do we need this at all? I vote merge them all! :)
>
Ok, its done and ready for commit. faqurl.ent is properly merged with
global.ent, no leading faqurl anymore.
The en/faq is updated properly and also ready to commit, the b
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Friedhelm Betz wrote:
> > > I totally agree with your point of view ;-)
> > > It might be desirable to merge faqurl amd global entities file?
> >
> > I like this idea, why do we have faq specific urls at all?
> > It seems like a bad idea and only means duplicate urls.
>
> Ser
I totally agree with your point of view ;-)
It might be desirable to merge faqurl amd global entities file?
I like this idea, why do we have faq specific urls at all?
It seems like a bad idea and only means duplicate urls.
Serious votes against merging faqurl.ent and global.ent?
My ideas:
Mer
> > I totally agree with your point of view ;-)
> > It might be desirable to merge faqurl amd global entities file?
>
> I like this idea, why do we have faq specific urls at all?
> It seems like a bad idea and only means duplicate urls.
Serious votes against merging faqurl.ent and global.ent?
My
I see three options:
a) Update the faq by hand with links used in reference.xml
b) Create an autogenerated list here
c) Remove most of the faq and simply state that the info
has been moved as each extension now lists how to obtain..
I like the idea of (c). I also like the idea of (b)
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
>> > This page is outdated and does not coincide with what we
>> > have in the reference.xml files. Sometimes the faq urls
>> > are different than the 'normal' ones.
>> >
>> > To remain BC, we can keep this faq but how about we not
>> > use the faq url
>> I totally agree with your point of view ;-)
>> It might be desirable to merge faqurl amd global entities file?
> I like this idea, why do we have faq specific urls at all?
Historic reasons? The integration of the FAQ happend not too long ago,
therfore I guess.
> It seems like a bad idea and
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> > This page is outdated and does not coincide with what we
> > have in the reference.xml files. Sometimes the faq urls
> > are different than the 'normal' ones.
> >
> > To remain BC, we can keep this faq but how about we not
> > use the faq urls for it
> > On a related note:
>
> > This page is outdated and does not coincide with what we
> > have in the reference.xml files. Sometimes the faq urls
> > are different than the 'normal' ones.
>
> > To remain BC, we can keep this faq but how about we not
> > use the faq urls for it but rather we use
This page is outdated and does not coincide with what we
have in the reference.xml files. Sometimes the faq urls
are different than the 'normal' ones.
To remain BC, we can keep this faq but how about we not
use the faq urls for it but rather we use the same links
found within each reference.xml i
> On a related note:
> This page is outdated and does not coincide with what we
> have in the reference.xml files. Sometimes the faq urls
> are different than the 'normal' ones.
> To remain BC, we can keep this faq but how about we not
> use the faq urls for it but rather we use the same links
On a related note:
This page is outdated and does not coincide with what we
have in the reference.xml files. Sometimes the faq urls
are different than the 'normal' ones.
To remain BC, we can keep this faq but how about we not
use the faq urls for it but rather we use the same links
found within
betzFri Jan 24 15:05:23 2003 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq obtaining.xml
Log:
tabs 2 spaces
Index: phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml:1.14 phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml:1.15
--- phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml:1.14Wed Apr
cortesi Wed Apr 3 12:46:54 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq obtaining.xml
Log:
one commit to Uppercase the all
Index: phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml:1.13 phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml:1.14
--- phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.
zak Sat Jan 12 05:38:23 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq obtaining.xml
Log:
Removed MySQL from the list of non-thread-safe extensions -- they have a thread safe
lib
Index: phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml:1.12 php
jeroen Sun Aug 5 11:14:45 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq obtaining.xml
Log:
Remove a ':w' save
Index: phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml:1.5 phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml:1.6
--- phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml:1.5
gobaSun Jul 22 09:39:57 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq obtaining.xml
Log:
Copy pasting is dangerous :))
Index: phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml:1.2 phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml:1.3
--- phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.x
damsWed Jul 18 10:34:08 2001 EDT
Added files:
/phpdoc/en/faq obtaining.xml
Log:
Adding new entry to faq.Still 8 to come :-)
Index: phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml
+++ phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml
Obtaining PHP
Where to download PHP?
This se
30 matches
Mail list logo
