I don't like the rendering ;-) but I miss some knowlegde, and this is probably
just an issue for xsl-sheets/DSSSL-sheets.
Please don't look at the docbook XML stuff from the rendering
perspective. We can render it in any way, but the structure needs to be
clear in the XML source. Adding toc to d
On Friday 30 May 2003 19:30, Philip Olson wrote:
> > Yes, if we agree to v2, the security part is a bit lost in getting
> > started.
> >
> > Anyway I woud like to see the security part moved to an appendix soon;-)
> >
> > Any objections to move the security part to an appendix?
>
> Sounds good to m
> >
> > Also note, that the choosen xml tags from docbook might not be optimal
> > (missused? some refentry/refsect tags for the servers).
>
[...]
>
> Also if you have a different part, there should be no problem with using
> standard subsections ... ... etc. What is the
> problem with that?
> Yes, if we agree to v2, the security part is a bit lost in getting started.
>
> Anyway I woud like to see the security part moved to an appendix soon;-)
>
> Any objections to move the security part to an appendix?
Sounds good to me except I believe moving sections like this
requires a systems
a) Apache Module Quick Reference
This is a little confusing and should be moved (or deleted)
into the Apache1 section.
That might be confusing yes. It would be better to move to the Apache 1
section to the start and then have a longer explanation.
d) Navigation
It's a little difficul
On Friday 30 May 2003 19:08, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
Hi Goba,
>
[...]
>
> Wow! First of all I would like to thank you to finally sit down and do
> something in one of the oldest content problems of the manual.
Thanks, but it took a looong time ;-)
> I very
> much prefer v2 because in v1 the installa
Hi Friedhelm!
long time ago, I promised to have a look at the installpart files under
chapters (see also RFC/installpart) and how this files can be reorganized.
The results can be viewed here:
www.holliwell.de/installpart/
Version 1 (v1): no separate part for installation
Version 2 (v2): sep
On Friday 30 May 2003 17:54, Philip Olson wrote:
Hi Philip
thanks for your quick reply,
>
> I like the idea of this separation of Windows/*nix but do
> have a few concerns, in looking at the *nix section:
>
> a) Apache Module Quick Reference
>
> This is a little confusing and should be moved (
Hello Friedhelm-
I like the idea of this separation of Windows/*nix but do
have a few concerns, in looking at the *nix section:
a) Apache Module Quick Reference
This is a little confusing and should be moved (or deleted)
into the Apache1 section.
b) Building
What is this section for
Hi,
long time ago, I promised to have a look at the installpart files under
chapters (see also RFC/installpart) and how this files can be reorganized.
The results can be viewed here:
www.holliwell.de/installpart/
Version 1 (v1): no separate part for installation
Version 2 (v2): separate part
10 matches
Mail list logo
