Hi all,
Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
I have an important exam tomorrow, so I will only be able to add my
opinion later this week (probably weekend). This is high priority on my
TODO however, not forgotten!
Goba
Jakub Vrana wrote:
Sean Coates wrote:
I don't want to start a huge campaign of people w
Jakub Vrana wrote:
Sean Coates wrote:
I don't want to start a huge campaign of people who are in/out, but I
_do_ think we should update this list, at least yearly.
I propose this list to the cover:
Mehdi Achour
Friedhelm Betz
(+) Sean Coates
Antony Dovgal
Nuno Lopes
(+) Aidan Lister
I have an important exam tomorrow, so I will only be able to add my
opinion later this week (probably weekend). This is high priority on my
TODO however, not forgotten!
Goba
Jakub Vrana wrote:
> Sean Coates wrote:
>
>>I don't want to start a huge campaign of people who are in/out, but I
>>_do_ t
Sean Coates wrote:
> I don't want to start a huge campaign of people who are in/out, but I
> _do_ think we should update this list, at least yearly.
I propose this list to the cover:
Mehdi Achour
Friedhelm Betz
(+) Sean Coates
Antony Dovgal
Nuno Lopes
(+) Aidan Lister
Philip Olson
Jakub Vrana
(+
Nuno Lopes wrote:
> Probably I'm also forgeting someone, but without some stats its difficult.
Some stats are here: http://www.vrana.cz/scite/phpdoc-en-log.html
It doesn't tell lot but can reveal some names.
Jakub Vrana
> I would also include Sara in the contributors list, for her work on
> streams and filters docs.
You both mentioned her..
She's already in both lists -- or do you mean the front page?
S
AFAIR we decided to not use hard numbers (so people will not do useless
commits just to reach a limit, as it was done before), but put up names
instead, and then wait some pre-specified time if someone votes against
their inclusion. Since we are mostly only looking one year back, it is
easier to d
> This might also be the right time to open an infrastructure category for
> credits, where we can include Derick, who suffers from a lot of work due
> to phpdoc problems :) And maybe livedocs hackers can also be credited there.
Yeah, I think that's a good idea.
Perhaps docweb, livedocs, builds, a
AFAIR we decided to not use hard numbers (so people will not do useless
commits just to reach a limit, as it was done before), but put up names
instead, and then wait some pre-specified time if someone votes against
their inclusion. Since we are mostly only looking one year back, it is
easier to d
>>AFAIR we decided to not use hard numbers (so people will not do useless
>>commits just to reach a limit, as it was done before), but put up names
>>instead, and then wait some pre-specified time if someone votes against
>>their inclusion. Since we are mostly only looking one year back, it is
>>ea
> AFAIR we decided to not use hard numbers (so people will not do useless
> commits just to reach a limit, as it was done before), but put up names
> instead, and then wait some pre-specified time if someone votes against
> their inclusion. Since we are mostly only looking one year back, it is
> ea
Hi,
> It's been about a year since we've revised the contributors list in the
> english manual.
>
> I don't want to start a huge campaign of people who are in/out, but I
> _do_ think we should update this list, at least yearly.
>
> Did we come up with actual credentials, last year? I honestly fo
Sean Coates wrote:
> Did we come up with actual credentials, last year? I honestly forget.
erm..
Did we come up with actual CRITERIA, last year?
S
13 matches
Mail list logo
