phpsoa@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Graham Charters
> > Sent: May 16, 2007 5:10 AM
> > To: phpsoa
> > Subject: [phpsoa] Re: nillable
>
> > Hi Mike,
>
> > Thanks for clarifying the use of pipe with the phpDocumentor
> > dev
2007 5:10 AM
> To: phpsoa
> Subject: [phpsoa] Re: nillable
>
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for clarifying the use of pipe with the phpDocumentor
> developer.
>
> Yes, the # notation was simply an alternative way to identify a
> complex type in a schema. It's large
sort of it, yes please implement it.
> > Let me know if I can help in any way.
>
> > Best,
>
> > Mike
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: phpsoa@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > > Behalf Of Matthew Peters
> > >
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: phpsoa@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Matthew Peters
> > Sent: May 15, 2007 1:47 PM
> > To: phpsoa
> > Subject: [phpsoa] Re: nillable
>
> > (Joining this thread a week late :-)
et me know if I can help in any way.
Best,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: phpsoa@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Matthew Peters
> Sent: May 15, 2007 1:47 PM
> To: phpsoa
> Subject: [phpsoa] Re: nillable
>
>
> (Joining this thread
ed behavior, any thoughts on the
> two outlined methods for supporting nillable parameters?
>
> Best,
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: phpsoa@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Graham Charters
> > Se
outlined methods for supporting nillable parameters?
Best,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: phpsoa@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Graham Charters
> Sent: May 12, 2007 6:16 PM
> To: phpsoa
> Subject: [phpsoa] Re: nillable
>
>
Sent: Sat 5/12/2007 6:15 PM
To: phpsoa
Subject: [phpsoa] Re: nillable
Hi Mike,
One of the goals of the SCA annotations has been to try to preserve
phpDocumentor generation, so I like your suggestion a lot. I took a
look at the phpDocumentor documentation and could only see mention of
the pip
Hi Mike,
One of the goals of the SCA annotations has been to try to preserve
phpDocumentor generation, so I like your suggestion a lot. I took a
look at the phpDocumentor documentation and could only see mention of
the pipe for multiple function returns, but not for parameters. I
gave it a whir
I've been looking into this issue further. The condition(s) to
determine if a callable method parameter is nillable more tricky than
I initially thought. I was hoping that a simple
ReflectionParameter::allowsNull() call would be all that is
necessary. However, and this makes perfect sense, all
groups.com
> Subject: [phpsoa] Re: nillable
>
>
> Caplan, Michael wrote:
> > Forgive my ignorance, but why does the WSDL generator define all
> types
> > as nillable? Should that not be defined depending on the prototype
> of
> > the method it is bound to?
&
Caplan, Michael wrote:
> Forgive my ignorance, but why does the WSDL generator define all types
> as nillable? Should that not be defined depending on the prototype of
> the method it is bound to?
You're right, there's a lot of information available from the
ReflectionParameter methods (all
Mike
I don't know either. I took a look at the code and you are right that
it seems to always apply nillable to the types that it finds. Maybe
it's trying to capture some optionality of PHP parameters but I'm not
sure. We need to get Matthew's view on it.
Simon
--~--~-~--~~---
13 matches
Mail list logo
