On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:58:38PM +0200, Henrik Sarvell wrote:
> Regarding detach, would this be a proper way of doing a server where detach
> is optional?:
>
> (de server (P H Detach)
>...
>(loop
> (setq *Sock (listen P))
> (NIL (fork) (close P))
> (close *Sock) )
>
Hi Henrik,
> Thanks Alex, will try and find the time to refactor all the local calls in
> the ext library sources.
Yes, sorry for the confusion! The change in namespace semantics last year was a
serious cut, but namespaces in PicoLisp were relatively new at that time, and
the change resulted in
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
> Henrik Sarvell writes:
> > I should probably create a small writeup on how to do that
> > for a typical PL project listening on a non standard port.
>
>
I bit the bullet and refactored, all is good now with the newest version.
Regarding detach, would this be a proper way of doing a server where detach
is optional?:
(de server (P H Detach)
(setq *Port P P (port *Port) *Home (cons H (chop H)))
(gc)
(loop
(setq *Sock (listen P))
Henrik Sarvell writes:
> I should probably create a small writeup on how to do that
> for a typical PL project listening on a non standard port.
https://logand.com/blog/picolisp-behind-nginx-proxy.html
from 22sep2009, time flies!
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
Hi Manuel,
I'll try and put it up in some way given the response.
Will notify in this thread when done.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Manuel Cano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where can we find it?
>
> Kind regards,
> Manu
>
> 2018-04-08 15:22 GMT+02:00 Henrik Sarvell
Thanks Alex, will try and find the time to refactor all the local calls in
the ext library sources.
Regarding ssl and httpGate, I'm managing proxy forwarding with Nginx these
days (encrypted too) so I could actually just delete them as I don't use
them anymore. I should probably create a small