On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
>> Trying to port tests to miniPicoLisp I needed to copy some
>> definitions from lib/misc.l from pico to mini, and this is what I found:
>>
>> 1) Many definitions don't appear in pico. Is it intented ? If so, why ?
>
> Do
Hi Christophe,
> Trying to port tests to miniPicoLisp I needed to copy some
> definitions from lib/misc.l from pico to mini, and this is what I found:
>
> 1) Many definitions don't appear in pico. Is it intented ? If so, why ?
Don't appear in *mini*, you mean? Well, yes, it is "mini" after all ;
Hi,
Trying to port tests to miniPicoLisp I needed to copy some
definitions from lib/misc.l from pico to mini, and this is what I found:
1) Many definitions don't appear in pico. Is it intented ? If so, why ?
2) Discrepancy in the $dat implementation:
mini
(format (pack (car S)))
