Re: Quick try at building 64-bit on OSX 10.8.3

2013-05-25 Thread Alexander Burger
HI Jorge, Well, x64 sucks, no surprise here, but not as much as x86. Perhaps a good strategy here would be to use one of the C calling registers (%r9 for instance) as a preloaded NIL. Restoring that value after calling C Surely %r9 could be freed for general purposes. I don't remember if that

Re: Quick try at building 64-bit on OSX 10.8.3

2013-05-25 Thread Jorge Acereda Maciá
On May 25, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote: HI Jorge, Well, x64 sucks, no surprise here, but not as much as x86. Perhaps a good strategy here would be to use one of the C calling registers (%r9 for instance) as a preloaded NIL. Restoring that value after

Re: Quick try at building 64-bit on OSX 10.8.3

2013-05-24 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Jorge, A quick question, what's the status of the *FPic variant on Linux? Is it working? If you mean the 64-bit version: Sorry, not at all ;-) If it works properly, I guess I could get it running on OSX as well when I find some spare time...-- That would be great! I must say that I

Re: Quick try at building 64-bit on OSX 10.8.3

2013-05-24 Thread Jorge Acereda Maciá
Hi Alex, On May 24, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote: If it works properly, I guess I could get it running on OSX as well when I find some spare time...-- That would be great! I must say that I gave up on that, see e.g.

Re: Quick try at building 64-bit on OSX 10.8.3

2013-05-23 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Jorge, Ok, if that's the problem this is nicer… Does it compile without warnings on your 32-bit system? Yes. Great! That's better. I didn't know about 'uintptr_t', that's exactly what we need here. Thanks! So let's stay with this :) ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE:

Re: Quick try at building 64-bit on OSX 10.8.3

2013-05-23 Thread Jorge Acereda Maciá
Hi, A quick question, what's the status of the *FPic variant on Linux? Is it working? If it works properly, I guess I could get it running on OSX as well when I find some spare time...-- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Quick try at building 64-bit on OSX 10.8.3

2013-05-22 Thread Jon Kleiser
Hi, I've just installed OSX 10.8.3, Xcode 4.6.2 and Command Line Tools (make, gcc, ...) on one of my Macs (but no Java yet), and I wanted to see if something magical have happened that would make it possible for me to build 64-bit PicoLisp, so I did the (cd src64; make). I then got this:

Re: Quick try at building 64-bit on OSX 10.8.3

2013-05-22 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Jon, to see if something magical have happened that would make it possible for me to build 64-bit PicoLisp, so I did the (cd src64; ... runtime. As I'm not very convinced that such a Java SE 6 runtime would give me the 64-bit PicoLisp, I have not accepted that offer yet. Am I wrong? ;-)

Re: Quick try at building 64-bit on OSX 10.8.3

2013-05-22 Thread Jorge Acereda Maciá
I tried to build the emu version on OSX and it failed. Here is the culprit line: emu.patch Description: Binary data Regards, Jorge On May 22, 2013, at 5:24 PM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote: Hi Jon, to see if something magical have happened that would make it possible

Re: Quick try at building 64-bit on OSX 10.8.3

2013-05-22 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Jorge, I tried to build the emu version on OSX and it failed. Here is the culprit line: Thanks! Unfortunately, it is not so easy, because then you get a warning on 32-bit systems: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast] So for 32-bits, we must still

Re: Quick try at building 64-bit on OSX 10.8.3

2013-05-22 Thread Jorge Acereda Maciá
On May 22, 2013, at 8:19 PM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote: Hi Jorge, I tried to build the emu version on OSX and it failed. Here is the culprit line: Thanks! Unfortunately, it is not so easy, because then you get a warning on 32-bit systems: cast from pointer to