Got it! ... thanks Alex!
Regards,
Kashyap
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:29 AM Alexander Burger
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:09:19AM -0700, C K Kashyap wrote:
> > I see, if the assumption was long to be 64 bits then perhaps all the
> > "long"s in the code should be changed to int64_t I
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:09:19AM -0700, C K Kashyap wrote:
> I see, if the assumption was long to be 64 bits then perhaps all the
> "long"s in the code should be changed to int64_t I see that there are
> several usages of long in the code other than the couple of places I
> changed.
The
Thanks Alex,
I see, if the assumption was long to be 64 bits then perhaps all the
"long"s in the code should be changed to int64_t I see that there are
several usages of long in the code other than the couple of places I
changed.
I was wondering though if there is some implementation of
Hi Kashyap,
> I've decided to try and extend miniPicoLisp with networking(or perhaps just
> the capability to call into external program) to make it useful as a
> scripting system that I can share with my colleagues. Please do let me know
> if that's not a good idea.
This is surely a good idea.
Hi Alex,
I've decided to try and extend miniPicoLisp with networking(or perhaps just
the capability to call into external program) to make it useful as a
scripting system that I can share with my colleagues. Please do let me know
if that's not a good idea.
Towards that, as a first step, I tried