Re: Review request for the patch for 64bit compilation of miniPicoLisp

2020-03-25 Thread C K Kashyap
Got it! ... thanks Alex! Regards, Kashyap On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:29 AM Alexander Burger wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:09:19AM -0700, C K Kashyap wrote: > > I see, if the assumption was long to be 64 bits then perhaps all the > > "long"s in the code should be changed to int64_t I

Re: Review request for the patch for 64bit compilation of miniPicoLisp

2020-03-25 Thread Alexander Burger
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:09:19AM -0700, C K Kashyap wrote: > I see, if the assumption was long to be 64 bits then perhaps all the > "long"s in the code should be changed to int64_t I see that there are > several usages of long in the code other than the couple of places I > changed. The

Re: Review request for the patch for 64bit compilation of miniPicoLisp

2020-03-25 Thread C K Kashyap
Thanks Alex, I see, if the assumption was long to be 64 bits then perhaps all the "long"s in the code should be changed to int64_t I see that there are several usages of long in the code other than the couple of places I changed. I was wondering though if there is some implementation of

Re: Review request for the patch for 64bit compilation of miniPicoLisp

2020-03-25 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Kashyap, > I've decided to try and extend miniPicoLisp with networking(or perhaps just > the capability to call into external program) to make it useful as a > scripting system that I can share with my colleagues. Please do let me know > if that's not a good idea. This is surely a good idea.

Review request for the patch for 64bit compilation of miniPicoLisp

2020-03-25 Thread C K Kashyap
Hi Alex, I've decided to try and extend miniPicoLisp with networking(or perhaps just the capability to call into external program) to make it useful as a scripting system that I can share with my colleagues. Please do let me know if that's not a good idea. Towards that, as a first step, I tried