Hi Christophe,
it doesn't have to be always 1.0. If it was, it would not need to be
there at all.
Oops. Could you give me some details about my mistake?
Isn't «1.0» always read as «10^(*Scl)» which is what I'd call the scale
factor?
Yes, but *Scl is concerned only in the reader, when
Hi all,
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Tomas Hlavaty t...@logand.com wrote:
: (* 1.0 1.0)
- 100
You want: (*/ 1.0 1.0 1.0), see http://software-lab.de/doc/ref_.html#*/
That's funny because I read about */ right before posting my email but
couldn't connect with my problem. If there is room
Hi Christophe,
Christophe Gragnic christophegrag...@gmail.com writes:
is my suggestion:
«…by multiplying with (or dividing by) the scale factor.»
could become
«…by multiplying with (or dividing by) the scale factor, which is always
`1.0`.»
it doesn't have to be always 1.0. If it was, it
Hi all crazy Lispers!
I managed to handle being NIL, thanks to Michel and Alex.
Now I have another similar problem with numbers.
First, I understand the reasons behind having fixpoint numbers
in Picolisp (basically simple implementation and control).
Now considering that my goal is to implement
Hi Christophe,
Christophe Gragnic christophegrag...@gmail.com writes:
: (scl 1) # just for some examples to show
- 1
: 1
- 1
: 1.0
- 10
: (* 1.0 1.0)
- 100
: (+ 1 1.0)
- 11
It's is just impossible for a teacher to explain this to a newbie
without being considered a fool. PicoLisp
Hi Christophe,
Now I have another similar problem with numbers.
First, I understand the reasons behind having fixpoint numbers
...
: (scl 1) # just for some examples to show
- 1
: 1
- 1
: 1.0
- 10
: (* 1.0 1.0)
- 100
: (+ 1 1.0)
- 11
It's is just impossible for a teacher to
