Re: miniPicoLisp and Emscripten: news, suggestions and questions

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Alexander Burger wrote: >> I can compile with the bnd[99] trick, until some better idea is found. > > Oh! Does this mean that you allocate 99 entries on each call? This expoldes > the > stack size :) And still might be too small if you e.g.

Re: miniPicoLisp and Emscripten: news, suggestions and questions

Hi Christophe, > I'm back at tweaking miniPicoLisp for it to be compilable by Emscripten. Cool! > I can compile with the bnd[99] trick, until some better idea is found. Oh! Does this mean that you allocate 99 entries on each call? This expoldes the stack size :) And still might be too small

miniPicoLisp and Emscripten: news, suggestions and questions

Hi, I'm back at tweaking miniPicoLisp for it to be compilable by Emscripten. I'm re-reading posts from a discussion we had: http://www.mail-archive.com/picolisp@software-lab.de/msg04447.html It's been 2.5 years now! I'm now a bit stronger in C and can understand some more bits. So I opened up my