Hi all,
this morning I finished the implementation of the last remaining
function in the 64-bit version (it was 'commit', btw)! Now the 64-bit
version should be compatible to the 32-bit version.
As we left off for a family trip for the rest of the day, I did not much
testing yet. In fact, the who
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi all,
this morning I finished the implementation of the last remaining
:D
function in the 64-bit version (it was 'commit', btw)! Now the 64-bit
I don't see it in the repo, maybe you forgot to _push_?
version should be compatible to the 32-bit
So is this then the mighty 3.0 release. Congrats Alex and keep up the
good work.
Rob-
Alexander Burger schrieb:
Hi all,
this morning I finished the implementation of the last remaining
function in the 64-bit version (it was 'commit', btw)! Now the 64-bit
version should be compatible to the
Hi,
I've just installed Mac OS X 10.6, aka "Snow Leopard", on a partition on
my Mac (Intel Core 2 Duo, which probably means 32 bit only), and I was
curious to see what the consequences might be for Pico Lisp. I downloaded
the ongoing dev. version of Pico Lisp and did the usual "(cd src; make
picol
can you use the "type" command on some of those .o files you get ?
also what is a typical "type" output on a working binary in your os.
maybe remove the -m32 switch in the makefile and see what happens.
rob
Jon Kleiser schrieb:
Hi,
I've just installed Mac OS X 10.6, aka "Snow Leopard", on a p
I've updated the converter now, the current version is more flexible
than earlier and will now also do (":key" (1 2 3)) -> {"key": [1, 2,
3]}.
/Henrik
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Henrik Sarvell wrote:
> Thanks for the idea TC, another alternative would be to give the
> parser a bias to lean
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 04:28:04PM -0300, TC wrote:
> I don't see it in the repo, maybe you forgot to _push_?
Ah, sorry, then we have a misunderstanding. As far as I remember, we
agreed that I will not push ongoing development code (i.e. the 64-bit
stuff), and we wait until 3.0 is finished.
I sug
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 10:48:17PM +0200, Jon Kleiser wrote:
> I've just installed Mac OS X 10.6, aka "Snow Leopard", on a partition on
> my Mac (Intel Core 2 Duo, which probably means 32 bit only), and I was
> ...
> picolisp)". The results weren't too nice, but I'm not sure what the
As I'm going
Hi Robert,
> maybe remove the -m32 switch in the makefile and see what happens.
This might not be a good idea, because then it will compile for the
64-bit architecture where the 32-bit interpreter will choke.
Cheers,
- Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe
And thanks to you, Robert, as this was all done on your server!
Cheers,
- Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, Alexander Burger wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 04:28:04PM -0300, TC wrote:
I don't see it in the repo, maybe you forgot to _push_?
Ah, sorry, then we have a misunderstanding. As far as I remember, we
agreed that I will not push ongoing development code (i.e. the 64-bit
stu
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 03:12:21AM -0300, TC wrote:
> ... it would be nice if core changes were kept in the repository,
> everyone should be free to work the way they prefer.
Right, this is better. So I'll keep the repo in sync.
> I'm eager to see what pL will turn into :D (of course, I'll help
12 matches
Mail list logo
