Ext library and file name indexer
Hi, I just noticed that bitbucket now allows an unlimited amount of private projects (last time I checked only 5 was supported I think). I got a little bit motivated by this and the fact that I also just finished a small snippet that recursively parses any directory and full text indexes all file names/directory names. Could be useful to more people than just me, especially since it also indexes the contents in archives. I've found several files I almost had given up hope of ever finding (looking for a specific file inside several dozen of 5GB+ archives manually is a horror story). Anyway, I ended up uploading it to bitbucket: https://bitbucket.org/hsarvell/indexer/overview Since it depends on my extended library I uploaded that too, this is the one that will probably be useful so someone: https://bitbucket.org/hsarvell/ext/overview A lot has already been uploaded to this list but uploading it to bitbucket makes it a bit more formal and easier to maintain/track. Issues reported in the following form: I try to use function X in file Y, it doesn't work will be noted but fixed whenever it needs to be fixed for usage in my own projects which might or might never happen. Issues reported like this: You need to replace X with Y on line Z in file A.l will be fixed right away.
Re: Ext library and file name indexer
henrik, there is http://hub.darcs.net/ with no limitations whatsoever on anything. darcs is a lot more logical version control system. it's a lot easier to remember it's options. it's interactive by default. avoids tons of merge conflicts automatically. it doesn't try to invent branching/forking, since every clone of a repo IS A branch or fork naturally. it's is very easy to install, since it's just 1 static exe on any platform. for such small sources what picolisp has, it's an overkill to use anything else... it's really the kind of tool which doesn't get in the way, unlike git. you can see tons of pull requests are talking about git, instead of the patch itself. people are struggling with it for years and years now... i admire how much simplicity could you showcase with picolisp; it's makes me feel bad if you let such dirt as git or hg touch its source ;) -- tom -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Re: Ext library and file name indexer
Anything newer than Subversion is pretty much equal in my book, that includes both darcs, hg and git. They're all so simple that it doesn't make sense spending time shopping in that area once you've settled for one of them, at least not for my use case. I use hg at work so I use bitbucket, it's as simple as that. Would not dream of learning yet another vcs when hg just works for me. On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Tamas Herman hermanta...@gmail.com wrote: henrik, there is http://hub.darcs.net/ with no limitations whatsoever on anything. darcs is a lot more logical version control system. it's a lot easier to remember it's options. it's interactive by default. avoids tons of merge conflicts automatically. it doesn't try to invent branching/forking, since every clone of a repo IS A branch or fork naturally. it's is very easy to install, since it's just 1 static exe on any platform. for such small sources what picolisp has, it's an overkill to use anything else... it's really the kind of tool which doesn't get in the way, unlike git. you can see tons of pull requests are talking about git, instead of the patch itself. people are struggling with it for years and years now... i admire how much simplicity could you showcase with picolisp; it's makes me feel bad if you let such dirt as git or hg touch its source ;) -- tom -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Re: Ext library and file name indexer
Hi Henrik Thanks for sharing. I have a few picolisp repos on bitbucket too. https://bitbucket.org/joebo Includes my orgmode parser, mustache template implementation, and blog. All have been running flawlessly for 8 continuous months. I have read Alex's comments on the stability of picolisp over the years. It is neat to experience it myself - especially since I am no expert at the language. Joe Anything newer than Subversion is pretty much equal in my book, that includes both darcs, hg and git. They're all so simple that it doesn't make sense spending time shopping in that area once you've settled for one of them, at least not for my use case. I use hg at work so I use bitbucket, it's as simple as that. Would not dream of learning yet another vcs when hg just works for me. On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Tamas Herman hermanta...@gmail.com wrote: henrik, there is http://hub.darcs.net/ with no limitations whatsoever on anything. darcs is a lot more logical version control system. it's a lot easier to remember it's options. it's interactive by default. avoids tons of merge conflicts automatically. it doesn't try to invent branching/forking, since every clone of a repo IS A branch or fork naturally. it's is very easy to install, since it's just 1 static exe on any platform. for such small sources what picolisp has, it's an overkill to use anything else... it's really the kind of tool which doesn't get in the way, unlike git. you can see tons of pull requests are talking about git, instead of the patch itself. people are struggling with it for years and years now... i admire how much simplicity could you showcase with picolisp; it's makes me feel bad if you let such dirt as git or hg touch its source ;) -- tom -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Re: Ext library and file name indexer
Thanks for sharing Joe, I knew of picostache from this list but it never really registered that you had uploaded to bitbucket, it has now :-) On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Joe Bogner joebog...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Henrik Thanks for sharing. I have a few picolisp repos on bitbucket too. https://bitbucket.org/joebo Includes my orgmode parser, mustache template implementation, and blog. All have been running flawlessly for 8 continuous months. I have read Alex's comments on the stability of picolisp over the years. It is neat to experience it myself - especially since I am no expert at the language. Joe Anything newer than Subversion is pretty much equal in my book, that includes both darcs, hg and git. They're all so simple that it doesn't make sense spending time shopping in that area once you've settled for one of them, at least not for my use case. I use hg at work so I use bitbucket, it's as simple as that. Would not dream of learning yet another vcs when hg just works for me. On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Tamas Herman hermanta...@gmail.comwrote: henrik, there is http://hub.darcs.net/ with no limitations whatsoever on anything. darcs is a lot more logical version control system. it's a lot easier to remember it's options. it's interactive by default. avoids tons of merge conflicts automatically. it doesn't try to invent branching/forking, since every clone of a repo IS A branch or fork naturally. it's is very easy to install, since it's just 1 static exe on any platform. for such small sources what picolisp has, it's an overkill to use anything else... it's really the kind of tool which doesn't get in the way, unlike git. you can see tons of pull requests are talking about git, instead of the patch itself. people are struggling with it for years and years now... i admire how much simplicity could you showcase with picolisp; it's makes me feel bad if you let such dirt as git or hg touch its source ;) -- tom -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
