On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Lawrence Bottorff wrote:
> So, what would the best way to learn picolisp be for a total beginner?
>
Real coding of any task is the best way to learn any programming language.
Mike
My experience with LXC is that they work just like a typical VM but
being a container they're faster and easier to handle. We've split up
our database over 10 LXC containers running MySQL, works great.
Caveat, we're using Ubuntu, I've gotten the impression that LXC is a
bit harder to setup in othe
I would say PL is much easier, less cruft.
Start with picolisp.com
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Lawrence Bottorff wrote:
> So, what would the best way to learn picolisp be for a total beginner? It
> might seem like you should just bite the bullet and learn regular Common
> Lisp first, then st
I get the impression comparing CL to Picolisp is a bit like comparing C++
to Javascript* - they look similar only if you stand far enough away from
the screen...
(* there isn't really a C-family language that fits the example, but anyway)
On 8 June 2016 at 14:46, Joe Golden wrote:
> I've writte
I've written some simple programs in Common Lisp and I agree that pico hues
more to the original spirit of McCarthy in it's simplicity and power. I say
learn pico first then you probably won't need CL ;-)
All that said, it's hard for newbies to learn. I don't expect it to be easy.
I don't t
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Lawrence Bottorff wrote:
> So, what would the best way to learn picolisp be for a total beginner?
Hi all,
As written in its introduction,
(This is not a Lisp tutorial, as it assumes some basic knowledge of
programming, Lisp, and even PicoLisp.)
http://software-lab.
If you have no Lisp background, and what you want to learn is PicoLisp, then I
don’t think learning Common Lisp first will be any advantage. I believe Common
Lisp differs quite a bit from PicoLisp.
If you have experience with some other popular language X, then you can compare
the Rosetta Code s
It's more like Common Lisp is a derivative of PicoLisp, seriously. :-) So I'd
go for pico first, it's easier to understand.
> 8 juni 2016 kl. 14:08 skrev Lawrence Bottorff :
>
> So, what would the best way to learn picolisp be for a total beginner? It
> might seem like you should just bite the
So, what would the best way to learn picolisp be for a total beginner? It
might seem like you should just bite the bullet and learn regular Common
Lisp first, then start learning picolisp. That is, you should know all the
capabilities of Lisp before you try to learn a derivative Lisp. Is this
true?
Thanks, Alex.
/Jon
> On 7. Jun, 2016, at 17:43, Alexander Burger wrote:
>
> Hi Jon,
>
>> I want to send arbitrary messages to an object MyObj. If I have a word
>> "msg", then I want to send the message 'msg> to MyObj. I do it like
>> this:
>>
>> (setq Word "msg")
>> (setq MsgSym (car (str (pa
10 matches
Mail list logo