Got it - thanks Alex.
I wish there was a libposix (perhaps using libuv) that PicoLisp would work
against and then it would magically work on Mac and Windows too :)
I was working on miniPicoLIsp with the idea of building in those
features into miniPicoLisp (since it already works on Windows - buil
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 06:42:33PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Yes, miniPicoLisp and Ersatz do not depend on POSIX. Mini just uses the C
> standard I/O stuff. "POSIX" basically means "Unix".
It means processes (yes, fork()) and process groups, terminal handling, signals,
pipes, file control (
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 09:28:36AM -0700, C K Kashyap wrote:
> again, miniPicoLisp is also POSIX compliant right - but it uses a very
> narrow slice of the POSIX API. Or am I understanding POSIX wrong here?
Yes, miniPicoLisp and Ersatz do not depend on POSIX. Mini just uses the C
standard I/O stuf
>
>
> How do you mean that? Pil21 is not even finished for the first version.
>
> Perhaps I am remembering it incorrectly - I thought pil21 (a couple of
months ago I think) - did not support 'fork'/'call' etc thereby making me
thing it did not depend POSIX as heavily yet - when I say that I mean,
d
Hi Kashyap,
> If I remember correctly - pil21 initially did not have the POSIX
> requirement. Is there a way to get older versions of pil21 (I know that it
> is a strange request for a POC :) )
How do you mean that? Pil21 is not even finished for the first version.
But anyway it was always POSIX
Thanks Alex,
I think I'll try and see if I can get a simple SDL callback to work with
miniPicoLisp - that way, I can really understand the issues better.
If I remember correctly - pil21 initially did not have the POSIX
requirement. Is there a way to get older versions of pil21 (I know that it
is a
Hi Kashyap,
C K Kashyap writes:
> I am now trying to figure out how to do FFI min miniPicoLisp and I
> realized that only pil64 has native/lisp support. Is there any reason
> it could not be done in the 'c' implementation of pil32? I just wanted
> to make sure that there is no "impossibility" abo
