Hi Rick, thanks for the feedback.
> ..[snip]..
> Answer: don't build with manual steps, use scripts (and test them, of
> course).[0] At large scale, orchestration systems do the same thing.
> For instance, they sometimes have to install software that is not
> pre-built in a canonical package repo
On 14/10/16 23:03, r...@tamos.net wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 22:12 +0200, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
>> On 14/10/16 22:01, r...@tamos.net wrote:
>>> But picolisp is for experienced programmers[1], a class of people who
>>> have no problem building software.
>>
>> Isn't this a bit of a truism. There
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 22:12 +0200, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> On 14/10/16 22:01, r...@tamos.net wrote:
> > But picolisp is for experienced programmers[1], a class of people who
> > have no problem building software.
>
> Isn't this a bit of a truism. There is nothing in the language
> itself making it u
On 14/10/16 22:01, r...@tamos.net wrote:
>
> But picolisp is for experienced programmers[1], a class of people who
> have no problem building software.
Isn't this a bit of a truism. There is nothing in the language
itself making it unsuitable for an UN-experienced programmer.
Because of vario
Hi Rowan,
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:47 +0300, Rowan Thorpe wrote:
> On 11 October 2016 at 16:03, Mike Pechkin wrote:
> > I have PIL on every OS it supports, except IRIX.
> > I can update or patch or compile PIL very fast without walls.
>
> I agree for personal use, and it is what I presently do on m
> When you say you are an ex-ports maintainer, do you mean in general?
> or of a Picolisp Ports-package in particular?
All related to OpenBSD.
It was in decades ago.
I cant help you here.
On 11 October 2016 at 16:03, Mike Pechkin wrote:
> ..[snip]..
> I have PIL on every OS it supports, except IRIX.
> I can update or patch or compile PIL very fast without walls.
> Nobody stay between me and Lisp. Freedom is not for free.
I agree for personal use, and it is what I presently do on m
> From superficial
> reading it seems it would just require some Makefile tweaks and a
> content-list file to create one - or would it be more complicated than
> that in reality?
>
As ports ex-maintainer I'would say - you dont need port for PIL, this is
jail and step backward.
I have PIL on ever
On 11 October 2016 at 12:13, Mike Pechkin wrote:
> >
> > Who want or can test for build and test bundled tests on pil32 and 64 on
> > FreeBSD 11 ?
>
> pil (32 and 64) passed all tests on FreeBSD-11 (i386, x64)
Related question for FreeBSD veterans: Is there, or has there
> Who want or can test for build and test bundled tests on pil32 and 64 on
> FreeBSD 11 ?
>
>
pil (32 and 64) passed all tests on FreeBSD-11 (i386, x64)
Mike
On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 21:43 +0300, Mike Pechkin wrote:
> Who want or can test for build and test bundled tests on pil32 and 64 on
> FreeBSD 11 ?
Hi Mike,
I won't be able to get around to installing 11 for a bit; so, it's all
you, my friend! :)
Regarding the announcement btw, it
hi all,
%subj% is out:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2016-October/001760.html
Who want or can test for build and test bundled tests on pil32 and 64 on
FreeBSD 11 ?
Mike
12 matches
Mail list logo