On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 03:12:21AM -0300, TC wrote:
> ... it would be nice if core changes were kept in the repository,
> everyone should be free to work the way they prefer.
Right, this is better. So I'll keep the repo in sync.
> I'm eager to see what pL will turn into :D (of course, I'll help
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, Alexander Burger wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 04:28:04PM -0300, TC wrote:
I don't see it in the repo, maybe you forgot to _push_?
Ah, sorry, then we have a misunderstanding. As far as I remember, we
agreed that I will not push ongoing development code (i.e. the 64-bit
stu
And thanks to you, Robert, as this was all done on your server!
Cheers,
- Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 04:28:04PM -0300, TC wrote:
> I don't see it in the repo, maybe you forgot to _push_?
Ah, sorry, then we have a misunderstanding. As far as I remember, we
agreed that I will not push ongoing development code (i.e. the 64-bit
stuff), and we wait until 3.0 is finished.
I sug
So is this then the mighty 3.0 release. Congrats Alex and keep up the
good work.
Rob-
Alexander Burger schrieb:
Hi all,
this morning I finished the implementation of the last remaining
function in the 64-bit version (it was 'commit', btw)! Now the 64-bit
version should be compatible to the
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi all,
this morning I finished the implementation of the last remaining
:D
function in the 64-bit version (it was 'commit', btw)! Now the 64-bit
I don't see it in the repo, maybe you forgot to _push_?
version should be compatible to the 32-bit
Hi all,
this morning I finished the implementation of the last remaining
function in the 64-bit version (it was 'commit', btw)! Now the 64-bit
version should be compatible to the 32-bit version.
As we left off for a family trip for the rest of the day, I did not much
testing yet. In fact, the who
