Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-17 Thread Alexander Burger
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:05:59PM +0100, Henrik Sarvell wrote: > Yes, I like the second one too. But I like Boh's too. Boh's is more a > logo and the garden sprinkler is more a symbol, more abstract. True. But then we should remember that Jon's first one (with the straight bars) would be compatib

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-17 Thread Martin Curran
Really nice work on the second variant Jon. Gets my vote :) Martin -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-17 Thread Henrik Sarvell
Yes, I like the second one too. But I like Boh's too. Boh's is more a logo and the garden sprinkler is more a symbol, more abstract. The question then is; do we want that or do we want more of a normal logo? /Henrik On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:12 AM, TC wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, Jon Kleiser

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-17 Thread TC
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, Jon Kleiser wrote: On 1/14/10 10:30 AM, Boh Yap wrote: hi alex, I am the one that is impressed by what you have done.. PicoLisp. .. Hi Boh Yap, I think your logos are quite elegant. I have made some tweaks to the 3-armed variant lately, but they probably are not as el

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-14 Thread Alexander Burger
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi Boh Yap, hi Jon, hi all, and, of course, Eugene! -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-14 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Boh Yap, hi Jon, hi all, now we have a larger and larger supply of nice and interesting logos :-) It is getting difficult to choose one. How can we proceed? I feel I cannot decide it. Can we use some democratic process, where everybody who is interested posts a vote for his favourite logo? I w

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-14 Thread Jon Kleiser
On 1/14/10 10:30 AM, Boh Yap wrote: hi alex, I am the one that is impressed by what you have done.. PicoLisp. .. Hi Boh Yap, I think your logos are quite elegant. I have made some tweaks to the 3-armed variant lately, but they probably are not as elegant as yours. They can be seen here:

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-12 Thread Alexander Burger
Wow, beautiful! I'm really impressed! -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-12 Thread Eugene
Hi Boh, No apology required. The choice of a logo is a community effort. In these early stages, brainstorming is encouraged. Thank you for sharing your ideas. Boh Yap wrote: hi alex, & all althoug I've been following this picolisp list, I have not been very active, largely because my cur

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-12 Thread Henrik Sarvell
Elegant! On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Boh Yap wrote: > hi alex, & all > > althoug I've been following this picolisp list, I have not been very > active, largely because my current work load has prevented me from > learning/using picolisp, which is something I wanted to do ... > > I am struck

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-12 Thread Alexander Burger
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:27:10AM +1100, Eugene wrote: > Very strange !!! > Maybe it's a over zealous outgoing mail filter at my end. Could it be my fault? Does the picoLisp mailing list mess up something? This mailing list is handled by the script "misc/mailing", which is also included in the

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-11 Thread TC
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Eugene wrote: Very strange !!! Maybe it's a over zealous outgoing mail filter at my end. It was only a very simple image. Here's a fixed width courier font rendition. \ \ \ /\ //\\ // \\ //\\ / / / Bas

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-11 Thread Eugene
Very strange !!! Maybe it's a over zealous outgoing mail filter at my end. It was only a very simple image. Here's a fixed width courier font rendition. \ \ \ /\ //\\ // \\ //\\ / / / Basically, it's like the three colou

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-08 Thread Alexander Burger
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 10:37:03AM +0100, Mateusz Jan Przybylski wrote: > On Friday 08 January 2010 10:20:01 you wrote: > > For some reason, your mails seem all empty in my Thunderbird mail app., > ... > > /Jon > ... > Same there; the mail seems to be empty, even thou viewing its source shows > cl

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-08 Thread Mateusz Jan Przybylski
On Friday 08 January 2010 10:20:01 you wrote: > On 1/7/10 11:56 PM, Eugene wrote: > > Hi Eugene, > > For some reason, your mails seem all empty in my Thunderbird mail app., > and when I check > , I > cannot find your mails there

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-08 Thread Jon Kleiser
On 1/7/10 11:56 PM, Eugene wrote: Hi Eugene, For some reason, your mails seem all empty in my Thunderbird mail app., and when I check , I cannot find your mails there either. Are you operating in stealth mode? ;-) /Jon -- U

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-07 Thread Jon Kleiser
On 1/7/10 9:23 AM, Alexander Burger wrote: Hi Eugene, in picoFarad, which uses the symbol "Rho" and of course "Lamda" in recognition of Lisp Thanks! For further discussion, I've also put it onto the test page. Cheers, - Alex I have never seen picoFarad written with the symbol "Rho", only

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-07 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Eugene, > in picoFarad, > which uses the symbol "Rho" and of course "Lamda" in recognition of Lisp Thanks! For further discussion, I've also put it onto the test page. Cheers, - Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-06 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Jon, > Here's my first take on the logo: > Great. Thanks! > Colors and widths can be adjusted. Is it OK that the lower end of the > blue bar is not hidden behind the red bar? If you want me to find some > more tasteful, not so naïve, colors

Re: Wiki, logo

2010-01-06 Thread Jon Kleiser
Hi again, Here's my first take on the logo: Colors and widths can be adjusted. Is it OK that the lower end of the blue bar is not hidden behind the red bar? If you want me to find some more tasteful, not so naïve, colors, I can give it a try.