Hi,
If Christophe is referring to the logic in doc/rlook.html, then I should be
able to fix that. I’m almost there, but there is something I’m struggling with.
Maybe tomorrow. ;-)
/Jon
On 23. aug. 2014, at 08:15, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
>> `car` and `cdr` are ok but all t
Hi Jon,
> If Christophe is referring to the logic in doc/rlook.html, then I
> should be able to fix that.
Ah, I see! Yes, this makes sense.
> I’m almost there, but there is something I’m struggling with. Maybe
> tomorrow. ;-)
Thanks! :)
♪♫ Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?s
Hi all,
Is there somewhere some info about "" being NIL?
I'd like to know why, maybe with some historical hindsight,
and if there is a mean to trick the interpreter?
The language I'm trying to embed in PicoLisp would love to have
"" and NIL different !
chri
--
http://profgra.org/lycee/ (site
Hi Christophe,
> Is there somewhere some info about "" being NIL?
http://software-lab.de/doc/ref.html#nilSym
...
• to represent a string of length zero
...
http://software-lab.de/doc/ref.html#nilSym-io
Besides for standard normal form, NIL is also recognized as ()
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Alexander Burger wrote:
>> Is there somewhere some info about "" being NIL?
>http://software-lab.de/doc/ref.html#nilSym
>http://software-lab.de/doc/ref.html#nilSym-io
Thanks. I knew about this links, I just wanted to know why.
>> The language I'm trying t
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Christophe Gragnic
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Alexander Burger
> wrote:
>>> Is there somewhere some info about "" being NIL?
>>http://software-lab.de/doc/ref.html#nilSym
>>http://software-lab.de/doc/ref.html#nilSym-io
>
> Thanks. I knew ab
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Michel Pelletier
wrote:
>
> If NIL doesn't exist at all, then why do you need to expose it? If
> you language exposes lists or strings then empty ones carry the same
> meaning.
I don't want to expose it.
Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear enough.
In particular, I'd like
Hi Christophe,
> wrote:
> >
> > If NIL doesn't exist at all, then why do you need to expose it? If
> > you language exposes lists or strings then empty ones carry the same
> > meaning.
>
> I don't want to expose it.
> Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear enough.
> In particular, I'd like my users to typ
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Alexander Burger wrote:
>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > If NIL doesn't exist at all, then why do you need to expose it? If
>> > you language exposes lists or strings then empty ones carry the same
>> > meaning.
>>
>> I don't want to expose it.
>> Sorry, maybe I wasn't clea