I apologize for the confusion, the issue was completely unrelated to
the core functionality, it's all good.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
>
>> Hi, I'm trying to add a relation, at first I added (rel newRel
>> (+String)) to the class, and then put newRel in the dbs.
>
> Right, though adding to 'dbs' makes only sense for indexes (i.e. as you
> did with the (rel newRel (+Ref +String)) below).
>
>
>> That didn't work though, information refused to get saved so I changed
>> the rel call to (rel newRel (+Ref +String)) but still the database
>> refuses to store anything in newRel when using for instance put!>.
>
> Strange. This should definitely work. There must be some other problem.
> Can you try to debug it more?
>
> Is there an error? For example, 'put!>' will complain in the 'has>'
> method if the relation is not known.
>
> ♪♫ Alex
> --
> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
