Alabhya Singh writes:
> 1. I am already on job!
Nice!
> Have converted, by hand, most of docs into orgmode.org format.
> In this process discovered "missing" RnRS type doc.
Reminds me very much of what I did to produce the two mentioned
books. Wouldn't it make more s
1. I am already on job!
Have converted, by hand, most of docs into orgmode.org format.
In this process discovered "missing" RnRS type doc.
Alas! Only an expert can write it.
2. Will appreciate if I get in pure ASCII or org form the following books
suggested by you.
(i) PicoLisp
Alabhya Singh writes:
> The layout of RnRS has Contents categories, BNF, Program structure,
> Formal syntax and semantics etc to give a succinct outline.
>
> PicoLisp docs need reorganization to be
The layout of RnRS has Contents categories, BNF, Program structure, Formal
syntax and semantics etc to give a succinct outline.
PicoLisp docs need reorganization to be in RnRS type "standard form" of
documentation. This will help users.
The layout of RnRS has Contents categories, BNF, Program structure, Formal
syntax and semantics etc to give a succinct outline.
PicoLisp docs need reorganization to be in RnRS type "standard form" of
documentation. This will help users.
Alabhya Singh writes:
> Dear List,
>
> RnRS for picoLisp will help
Dear List,
RnRS for picoLisp will help immensely.
Even in documentation, perfection is achieved with irreducibility.
Regards,
Alabhya
