Re: Next pig release

2009-03-09 Thread Nigel Daley
If we're committing to backward compatibility for a while, then I'd +1  
1.0.0.  I think Pig is stable enough.


Nige

On Mar 9, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Alan Gates wrote:

+1 on doing a release.  +0 on calling it 1.0.  Are we really that  
stable?


Alan.

On Mar 6, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:


Pig Developers and Committers,

Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
propose that it is time for the next release.

I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a  
major

rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
interfaces.

Olga






RE: Next pig release

2009-03-09 Thread Olga Natkovich
Yes, I believe that we plan to keep our interfaces stable for some time.

Olga 

 -Original Message-
 From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com] 
 Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 5:57 PM
 To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org
 Subject: Re: Next pig release
 
 If we're committing to backward compatibility for a while, 
 then I'd +1 1.0.0.  I think Pig is stable enough.
 
 Nige
 
 On Mar 9, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
 
  +1 on doing a release.  +0 on calling it 1.0.  Are we really that
  stable?
 
  Alan.
 
  On Mar 6, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
 
  Pig Developers and Committers,
 
  Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
  propose that it is time for the next release.
 
  I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a  
  major
  rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
  interfaces.
 
  Olga